Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Mice Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

Cooler Master MM310 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Connectivity:wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:12000 DPIWeight:50 g

Cooler Master MM310 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

Cooler Master MM310
6.6/10

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.3

Technical score

20%

7.6

User score

â–²Better than 59% of mice
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–²Better than 57%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

36%

5.3

Performance & Sensor

22%

6.6

Controls

16%

9.4

Design

14%

9.7

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

â–²Better than 61%
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

4.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 76%
  • cooler-master-mm310
cooler-master-mm310
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse Cooler Master MM310

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

36%

5.3

Performance & Sensor

22%

6.6

Controls

16%

9.4

Design

14%

9.7

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

6.3
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

4.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Cooler Master MM310 has a popularity score of 4.8 points, which is lower than that of 66.2% of products in this category.
4.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.6
Brand name
Cooler
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
N/A
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
wired only.
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This mouse supports wired connectivity, which is less versatile than 65.1% of mice and equal to 34.9% of mice.
connection modes: wired.
Bluetooth support
no
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
no
This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
no
This mouse does not include a receiver. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
N/A
Rechargeable battery
no
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
6
This mouse has 6 buttons, which is more than 23.2% of mice and equal to 40% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
5
This mouse has 5 programmable buttons, which is less than 64.5% of mice and equal to 13.4% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
ambidextrous
Weight
50 g
This mouse weighs 50 g, which makes it lighter than 91.9% of mice and equal to 0.7% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
paracord
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
5
This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, which is more than 81.4% of mice and equal to 18.2% of mice.
Onboard memory size
?
Software name
MasterPlus+
Firmware upgradable
yes
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Cooler Master MM310 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 4 more onboard profiles
    This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    5 vs 1
  • 39% lower mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 50 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    50 g vs 82 g
  • 30 million clicks longer switch lifespan
    This mouse offers switch durability of 60 million clicks, while the average mouse offers switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    60 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • Adjustable debounce time
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • 2 more stored DPI steps
    This mouse stores 7 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    7 vs 5
  • 2 more stored DPI steps
    This mouse stores 7 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    7 vs 5
  • 30 million clicks longer switch lifespan
    This mouse offers switch durability of 60 million clicks, while the average mouse offers switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    60 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • Adjustable debounce time
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • 39% lower mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 50 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    50 g vs 82 g
  • 4 more onboard profiles
    This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    5 vs 1
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • 1 fewer programmable buttons
    This mouse has 5 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    5 vs 6
  • No automatic sleep mode
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No receiver included
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • 45% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 220 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    220 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • No battery level indicator
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 200 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • Limited connectivity
    This mouse supports wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired.
    wired vs wireless
  • 5.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Cooler Master MM310
    the average mouse
    Cooler Master MM310 has a lower user score than the average mouse (7.57 vs 8).
    7.57 vs 8
  • 33.5% less popular
    Cooler Master MM310 is less popular than the average mouse (4.78 vs 6.4).
    4.78 vs 6.38
  • 45% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 220 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    220 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 200 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 25% lower maximum acceleration
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 30 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    30 G vs 40 G
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • No receiver included
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • Limited connectivity
    This mouse supports wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired.
    wired vs wireless
  • No automatic sleep mode
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No battery level indicator
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 1 fewer programmable buttons
    This mouse has 5 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    5 vs 6
  • 5 mm wider mouse width
    This mouse has a width of 71 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    71 mm vs 66 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techpowerup.com
22/02/2023
Summary of the review
C
cogconnected.com
30/08/2022
Summary of the review
E
eteknix.com
19/10/2022
Summary of the review
T
theouterhaven.net
13/09/2022
Summary of the review
A
alktech.co
12/01/2023
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
30/08/2022
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Cooler Master MM310

  • Ultra-lightweight 50g shell without exterior holes
  • Excellent value for money
  • Highly flexible 'Ultraweave' cable reduces snagging
  • Smooth glide performance from 95% pure PTFE feet
  • Durable mechanical switches rated for 60 million clicks
  • Reliable PixArt PAW3327 optical sensor
  • Comfortable symmetrical shape for palm and claw grips

What customers don't like about Cooler Master MM310

  • Software (MasterPlus+) can be resource-heavy for RAM and CPU
  • The build and materials can feel 'cheap' to some users
  • Noticeable pre-travel on some mouse buttons
  • Side button placement is unsuitable for left-handed users despite symmetrical shape
  • Scroll wheel can feel too smooth or lack tactility for some
  • Base of the mouse features somewhat sharp edges
  • Clicks may double-click when set to the lowest (1ms) latency setting

Verdict

The Cooler Master MM310 is an ultra-lightweight wired gaming mouse featuring a symmetrical, hole-less shell that weighs just 50g. It is equipped with a PixArt PAW3327 optical sensor supporting up to 12,000 DPI, 220 IPS tracking speed, and 30G acceleration, paired with durable mechanical switches rated for 60 million clicks. Key advantages include its nimble handling, a highly flexible 1.8m Ultraweave cable that minimizes drag, and genuine PTFE feet for a smooth glide. It also supports NVIDIA Reflex for reduced latency and offers customizable RGB lighting through MasterPlus+ software. However, some users have noted a slight rattle in the scroll wheel and find the overall materials feel somewhat budget-oriented compared to higher-end models.

Compare Cooler Master MM310 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Cooler Master MM310 and other products in the Mice category

No results found