OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Tristar MX-4850 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£10Power:350 WCordless:noWeight:0.49 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:no

Tristar MX-4850 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Tristar MX-4850
4.9/10

Overall score

Score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

65%

4.6

Technical score

25%

4.6

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 99% of immersion blenders
6.4

Value for money

Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

4.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 86%
4.6

Technical score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

45%

3.4

Performance

20%

3.9

Accessories

15%

6.7

Design

10%

4.9

Usability

10%

7.8

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 97%
4.6

User score

User score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models

4.6

Mark 8.3 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.4

Rating

30%

7.9

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 99%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • tristar-mx-4850
  • tristar-mx-4850
  • tristar-mx-4850
tristar-mx-4850
tristar-mx-4850
tristar-mx-4850
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Tristar MX-4850

Technical score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components:

45%

3.4

Performance

20%

3.9

Accessories

15%

6.7

Design

10%

4.9

Usability

10%

7.8

Dimensions

4.6
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components:

70%

4.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.4
Power
350 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 350 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 74.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 4.3% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
12,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 12,000 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 77.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
no
This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
0
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 0 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 79.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.2% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
?
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Plastic
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1 m, which is shorter reach than 82% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 14.4% of immersion blenders.
Weight
0.49 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.49 kg, which is lighter in hand than 98.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.1% of immersion blenders.
Height
35 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 35 cm in height, which is more compact than 83.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.9% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
6.5x 6.5

Tristar MX-4850 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 55% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.5 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.49 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (35 cm vs 40 cm).
    35 cm vs 40 cm
  • 4.5x cheaper
    Tristar MX-4850 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£10 vs £45).
    £10 vs £45
  • 4.5x cheaper
    Tristar MX-4850 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£10 vs £45).
    £10 vs £45
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 55% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.5 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.49 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (35 cm vs 40 cm).
    35 cm vs 40 cm
  • 41.8% lower user score
    User score
    4.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models

    4.6

    Mark 8.3 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.4

    Rating

    30%

    7.9

    Popularity

    4.6 vs 7.9
  • 350 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (350 W vs 700 W).
    350 W vs 700 W
  • 2,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 41.8% lower user score
    User score
    4.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models

    4.6

    Mark 8.3 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.4

    Rating

    30%

    7.9

    Popularity

    4.6 vs 7.9
  • 20.4% worse value for money
    Tristar MX-4850 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.42 vs 7.7).
    6.42 vs 7.73
  • 350 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (350 W vs 700 W).
    350 W vs 700 W
  • 2,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • Is not stated as BPA-free
    This immersion blender is not stated as BPA-free while the average immersion blender is.
  • 0.2 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1 m vs 1.2 m

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Tristar MX-4850

  • Equipped with an extra-long shank/rod, making it easy to blend deep inside tall pots and pans.
  • Features a comfortable, ergonomic handle design that reduces user fatigue.
  • The 350-watt motor offers decent power efficiency for standard mixing tasks.
  • Equipped with durable, precise stainless steel blades ideal for soups and smoothies.
  • The detachable blending stick and easy disassembly make it very quick and simple to clean.
  • Compact structure allows for convenient storage in smaller kitchens.

What customers don't like about Tristar MX-4850

  • Limited to only two speed settings, offering less precise texture control compared to variable-speed models.
  • The 350W motor may struggle or heat up if used continuously on dense or highly hard ingredients over long periods.
  • It is a basic, no-frills model that does not include extra kitchen accessories like a whisk, chopper bowl, or measuring beaker.

Verdict

The Tristar MX-4850 is a corded electric immersion blender featuring a robust 350-watt motor, an extra-long detachable blending rod, durable stainless steel blades, and a 1-meter power cord. Operating at a standard 230-volt AC power supply, its main characteristics include an ergonomic white plastic housing with stainless steel accents, two distinctive speed settings for custom consistency control, and compact dimensions measuring 6.5 x 6.5 x 35 centimeters with a lightweight profile of 444 grams. Its primary pros highlight its effortless, precise blending capabilities for pureeing soups or preparing smoothies directly inside pots, alongside its easy disassembly for convenient kitchen storage and a comfortable, ergonomic grip that reduces hand fatigue. However, its main cons include a lack of versatile attachments, a restriction against continuous usage for more than 1 minute without a 5-minute cooldown, and official manufacturer specifications indicating that its components are not dishwasher safe and lack non-slip structural feet.

Compare Tristar MX-4850 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Tristar MX-4850 and other immersion blenders

No results found