OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

STATUS Odessa ODESSA1PKB4 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£15Power:170 WCordless:noWeight:0.49 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

STATUS Odessa ODESSA1PKB4 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

STATUS Odessa ODESSA1PKB4
5.9/10

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

65%

4.6

Technical score

25%

8.7

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 90% of immersion blenders
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 75%
4.6

Technical score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

45%

3.0

Performance

20%

3.3

Accessories

15%

7.0

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

9.5

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 97%
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models

70%

8.6

Rating

30%

9.0

Popularity

â–²Better than 62%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • status-odessa-odessa1pkb4
  • status-odessa-odessa1pkb4
  • status-odessa-odessa1pkb4
  • status-odessa-odessa1pkb4
  • status-odessa-odessa1pkb4
  • status-odessa-odessa1pkb4
  • status-odessa-odessa1pkb4
status-odessa-odessa1pkb4
status-odessa-odessa1pkb4
status-odessa-odessa1pkb4
status-odessa-odessa1pkb4
status-odessa-odessa1pkb4
status-odessa-odessa1pkb4
status-odessa-odessa1pkb4
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender STATUS Odessa ODESSA1PKB4

Technical score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components:

45%

3.0

Performance

20%

3.3

Accessories

15%

7.0

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

9.5

Dimensions

4.6
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components:

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.1
Power
170 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 170 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 96.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.5% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
1
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 1 speed levels, which is less adjustable than 79.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
0
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 0 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 79.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.2% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Plastic
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
?
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
?
Weight
0.49 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.49 kg, which is lighter in hand than 98.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.1% of immersion blenders.
Height
34 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 34 cm in height, which is more compact than 87.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.6% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
10x 10

STATUS Odessa ODESSA1PKB4 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 55% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.5 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.49 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 6 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (34 cm vs 40 cm).
    34 cm vs 40 cm
  • 3x cheaper
    STATUS Odessa ODESSA1PKB4 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£15 vs £45).
    £15 vs £45
  • 10.1% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 62% of models

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    9.0

    Popularity

    8.7 vs 7.9
  • 3x cheaper
    STATUS Odessa ODESSA1PKB4 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£15 vs £45).
    £15 vs £45
  • 10.1% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 62% of models

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    9.0

    Popularity

    8.7 vs 7.9
  • 55% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.5 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.49 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 6 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (34 cm vs 40 cm).
    34 cm vs 40 cm
  • 530 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (170 W vs 700 W).
    170 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 speed levels fewer
    This immersion blender has fewer speed increments, giving less nuance between gentle stirring and intense pureeing compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 8.3% worse value for money
    STATUS Odessa ODESSA1PKB4 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.14 vs 7.7).
    7.14 vs 7.73
  • 530 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (170 W vs 700 W).
    170 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 1 speed levels fewer
    This immersion blender has fewer speed increments, giving less nuance between gentle stirring and intense pureeing compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about STATUS Odessa ODESSA1PKB4

  • Extremely lightweight and compact design that minimizes hand fatigue during use
  • Simple, intuitive one-touch operation that is ideal for quick recipe preparation
  • Space-saving form factor that fits easily into small kitchen drawers or cupboards
  • Affordable, budget-friendly price point making it highly accessible
  • Sleek and easy-to-clean gloss white finish that fits modern kitchen decors
  • Sufficient for basic, soft-ingredient tasks like pureeing soups and baby food

What customers don't like about STATUS Odessa ODESSA1PKB4

  • Low-power motor (170W) that struggles significantly with frozen or hard ingredients
  • Only a single-speed setting with no variable control or turbo boost functionality
  • Corded operation requires the user to always stay close to a mains power socket
  • Lacks extra kitchen accessories such as a whisk, chopping bowl, or measuring beaker

Verdict

The Status Odessa ODESSA1PKB4 is a corded stick immersion blender operating at 170W on 240V with a sleek gloss white finish. Its main characteristics include durable stainless steel quad blades, an ultra-lightweight design weighing approximately 489g, compact dimensions measuring H34 x W6.5 x D6.5cm, and a simple press-to-blend one-touch operation mechanism. Key advantages include its comfortable ergonomic handling that reduces hand fatigue, its easy-to-clean body with dishwasher-safe non-electrical parts, and its excellent capability for effortlessly blending everyday recipes like soups, smoothies, and baby food. However, notable drawbacks include its limiting single-speed control with no variable speed options, and its lower 170W power output which makes it less suitable for heavy-duty tasks or grinding very hard, dense ingredients.

Compare STATUS Odessa ODESSA1PKB4 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of STATUS Odessa ODESSA1PKB4 and other immersion blenders

No results found