OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

SARO XM-22 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£330Power:300 WCordless:noWeight:2.65 kgStepless variable speed:yesDishwasher-safe parts:no

SARO XM-22 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

SARO XM-22
6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

65%

5.6

Technical score

25%

?

User scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 8.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 74% of immersion blenders
5.4

Value for money

Value for money
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

3.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 93%
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

45%

5.6

Performance

20%

3.3

Accessories

15%

9.6

Design

10%

4.0

Usability

10%

6.0

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 78%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
No ratings from across the web yet, so it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
No ratings from across the web yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • saro-xm-22
saro-xm-22
Where to buy
    N/A~ £330
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender SARO XM-22

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

45%

5.6

Performance

20%

3.3

Accessories

15%

9.6

Design

10%

4.0

Usability

10%

6.0

Dimensions

5.6
Value for money
Value for money
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

3.2

Price

5.4
Power
300 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 300 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 79.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.6% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
?
Stepless variable speed
yes
This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
15,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 15,000 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 56.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 14.3% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
yes
This immersion blender designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
no
This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
0
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 0 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 79.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.2% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Forged steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
2.85 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 2.85 m, which is longer reach than 92.8% of immersion blenders.
Weight
2.65 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 2.65 kg, which is heavier in hand than 90.8% of immersion blenders.
Height
56.4 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 56.4 cm in height, which is taller than 92.5% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

SARO XM-22 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1.65 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (2.9 m vs 1.2 m).
    2.85 m vs 1.2 m
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (15,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    15,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (15,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    15,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1.65 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (2.9 m vs 1.2 m).
    2.85 m vs 1.2 m
  • 400 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (300 W vs 700 W).
    300 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2.43x heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (2.7 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    2.65 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • 16.4 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (56.4 cm vs 40 cm).
    56.4 cm vs 40 cm
  • 42.1% worse value for money
    SARO XM-22 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (5.44 vs 7.7).
    5.44 vs 7.73
  • 7.33x more expensive
    SARO XM-22 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£330 vs £45).
    £330 vs £45
  • 400 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (300 W vs 700 W).
    300 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2.43x heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (2.7 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    2.65 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 16.4 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (56.4 cm vs 40 cm).
    56.4 cm vs 40 cm

Third-party reviews

What customers like about SARO XM-22

  • Powerful 300W motor with variable speed adjustments (1,500 to 15,000 RPM).
  • Ergonomic, anti-slip Bi-Mat grip handle that minimizes user fatigue.
  • Removable 300mm stainless steel blending shaft that is exceptionally easy to detach for cleaning.
  • Heavy-duty, professional-grade design built for continuous operation up to 15 liters without overheating.
  • Flat-base design allows the detached handle to sit flat on surfaces without making a mess.
  • Forged steel Y-shaped cutting blade provides high efficiency and a long life span.
  • Integrated blade guard hood reduces liquid splashing during high-volume prep.

What customers don't like about SARO XM-22

  • The 300mm (nearly 12-inch) blending arm and total length make it bulky to store in smaller home kitchen drawers.
  • The 3.25-inch blade guard is too wide to fit inside narrow containers like small mason jars.
  • The detachable blending shaft is easy to rinse under running water but is not rated as dishwasher safe.
  • At over 3 kg (approximately 7 lbs total), it can feel heavy compared to entry-level consumer models during short tasks.

Verdict

The SARO XM-22 is a professional-grade, corded electric commercial immersion blender powered by a 300-watt motor that operates at an adjustable variable speed ranging from 1,500 to 15,000 RPM. Designed for heavy-duty, continuous operation without overheating, it efficiently processes food in containers holding up to 15 litres. Main characteristics include a 300 mm detachable stainless steel mixing shaft, a 50 mm forged steel Y-shaped cutting blade, and an 82 mm blade guard designed to prevent accidental splashing. The primary pros of this NSF-certified appliance include its ergonomic non-slip Bi-Mat grip handle, which reduces operator fatigue, its intuitive tool-free click-on arm attachment for effortless maintenance, and its durable Life-Plus motor architecture. On the downside, its net weight of 2.65 kg (total length of 564 mm) makes it notably heavier and bulkier than standard residential models, and its 300W power draw is lower than some heavy-duty industrial competitors designed for larger bulk production.

Compare SARO XM-22 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of SARO XM-22 and other immersion blenders

No results found