Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

ESGE 95307 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£290Power:200 WCordless:yesWeight:0.7 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:?

ESGE 95307 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

ESGE 95307
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

65%

6.2

Technical score

25%

?

User scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 8.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 62% of immersion blenders
5.9

Value for money

Value for money
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

4.1

Price

â–¼Worse than 90%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

45%

4.9

Performance

20%

6.4

Accessories

15%

6.6

Design

10%

7.2

Usability

10%

9.4

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 63%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
No ratings from across the web yet, so it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
No ratings from across the web yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • esge-95307
esge-95307
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender ESGE 95307

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

45%

4.9

Performance

20%

6.4

Accessories

15%

6.6

Design

10%

7.2

Usability

10%

9.4

Dimensions

6.2
Value for money
Value for money
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

4.1

Price

5.9
Power
200 W
This immersion blender delivers 200 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 87.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.1% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
3
This immersion blender features 3 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 53.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
15,500 RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 15,500 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 71% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
?
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
yes
This immersion blender supports cordless operation.
Battery type
Lithium-ion
Show more
Number of accessories
3
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
?
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
no
This immersion blender does not support a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
-
Weight
0.7 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.7 kg, which is lighter in hand than 88.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.7% of immersion blenders.
Height
41 cm
This immersion blender stands 41 cm in height, which is taller than 61.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 6.7% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

ESGE 95307 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 70 min faster charging time
    This immersion blender returns to full cord-free readiness sooner between lunch preparations and dinner soups than the average immersion blender (60 min vs 130 min).
    60 min vs 130 min
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 35.7% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.7 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.7 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 1,000 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (15,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    15,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 1 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 1,000 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (15,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    15,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 1 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 70 min faster charging time
    This immersion blender returns to full cord-free readiness sooner between lunch preparations and dinner soups than the average immersion blender (60 min vs 130 min).
    60 min vs 130 min
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 35.7% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.7 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.7 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 500 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (200 W vs 700 W).
    200 W vs 700 W
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 5 min shorter battery runtime
    This immersion blender provides less wireless operating time, risking battery exhaustion during elaborate multi-course meals compared to the average immersion blender (20 min vs 25 min).
    20 min vs 25 min
  • Does not support a detachable shaft
    This immersion blender does not support a detachable shaft while the average immersion blender does.
  • 30% worse value for money
    ESGE 95307 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (5.94 vs 7.7).
    5.94 vs 7.73
  • 6.44x more expensive
    ESGE 95307 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£290 vs £45).
    £290 vs £45
  • 1 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (41 cm vs 40 cm).
    41 cm vs 40 cm
  • 30% worse value for money
    ESGE 95307 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (5.94 vs 7.7).
    5.94 vs 7.73
  • 6.44x more expensive
    ESGE 95307 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£290 vs £45).
    £290 vs £45
  • 500 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (200 W vs 700 W).
    200 W vs 700 W
  • 5 min shorter battery runtime
    This immersion blender provides less wireless operating time, risking battery exhaustion during elaborate multi-course meals compared to the average immersion blender (20 min vs 25 min).
    20 min vs 25 min
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a detachable shaft
    This immersion blender does not support a detachable shaft while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (41 cm vs 40 cm).
    41 cm vs 40 cm

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ESGE 95307

  • Maximum freedom of movement thanks to the cordless, wireless design
  • High versatility with a longer drive shaft ideal for large gastronomy pots and handling up to 30 liters of liquid
  • Excellent build quality and durability with a robust Swiss-made motor
  • Convenient continuous operation provided by the two included hot-swappable, removable lithium-ion batteries
  • Powerful performance featuring a booster function that reaches up to 15,500 RPM
  • Fast one-hour battery charging time and an energy-saving automatic 60-second sleep function
  • Wide compatibility with existing traditional ESGE attachment accessories

What customers don't like about ESGE 95307

  • Significantly high premium price point compared to standard immersion blenders
  • Added weight from the built-in battery pack can cause hand fatigue during extended use
  • The electronic soft-touch power switch pressure point can feel somewhat vague or spongy to operate
  • Requires managing a separate desktop charging station which occupies counter or drawer space

Verdict

The Unold ESGE-Zauberstab Cordless Pro White (Model 95307) is a high-performance cordless immersion blender powered by a 200-watt motor and equipped with two removable lithium-ion batteries. Key technical specifications include two operational speeds of 8,000 RPM and 14,000 RPM, a powerful booster function pushing up to 15,500 RPM, and the capacity to process up to 30 liters of liquid. The main advantages are its ultimate wireless portability, convenient battery level indicator, compatibility with all standard ESGE attachments, and an automatic energy-saving sleep function after 60 seconds of idling. However, its high premium price point and a mixed plastic-and-metal casing that is less robust than solid stainless steel represent its primary disadvantages.

Compare ESGE 95307 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ESGE 95307 and other immersion blenders

No results found