OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

SARO XM-12 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180Power:240 WCordless:noWeight:1.51 kgStepless variable speed:yesDishwasher-safe parts:yes

SARO XM-12 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

SARO XM-12
6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

65%

5.9

Technical score

25%

5.9

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 86% of immersion blenders
6.2

Value for money

Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

6.5

Price

â–¼Worse than 88%
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

45%

4.4

Performance

20%

5.0

Accessories

15%

9.6

Design

10%

6.8

Usability

10%

7.8

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 70%
5.9

User score

User score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models

5.9

Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.6

Rating

30%

6.0

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 89%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • saro-xm-12
  • saro-xm-12
  • saro-xm-12
  • saro-xm-12
  • saro-xm-12
  • saro-xm-12
  • saro-xm-12
  • saro-xm-12
saro-xm-12
saro-xm-12
saro-xm-12
saro-xm-12
saro-xm-12
saro-xm-12
saro-xm-12
saro-xm-12
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender SARO XM-12

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components:

45%

4.4

Performance

20%

5.0

Accessories

15%

9.6

Design

10%

6.8

Usability

10%

7.8

Dimensions

5.9
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

6.5

Price

6.2
Power
240 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 240 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 86.8% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
1
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 1 speed levels, which is less adjustable than 79.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
yes
This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
15,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 15,000 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 56.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 14.3% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
yes
This immersion blender designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
?
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Forged steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
?
Weight
1.51 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.51 kg, which is heavier in hand than 73.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.5% of immersion blenders.
Height
45 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 45 cm in height, which is taller than 84.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.7% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

SARO XM-12 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (15,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    15,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (15,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    15,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 460 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (240 W vs 700 W).
    240 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 25.3% lower user score
    User score
    5.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models

    5.9

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    6.0

    Popularity

    5.9 vs 7.9
  • 5 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (45 cm vs 40 cm).
    45 cm vs 40 cm
  • 38.7% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.5 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.51 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 1 speed levels fewer
    This immersion blender has fewer speed increments, giving less nuance between gentle stirring and intense pureeing compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 25.3% lower user score
    User score
    5.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models

    5.9

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    6.0

    Popularity

    5.9 vs 7.9
  • 25.2% worse value for money
    SARO XM-12 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.17 vs 7.7).
    6.17 vs 7.73
  • 4x more expensive
    SARO XM-12 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£180 vs £45).
    £180 vs £45
  • 460 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (240 W vs 700 W).
    240 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 speed levels fewer
    This immersion blender has fewer speed increments, giving less nuance between gentle stirring and intense pureeing compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 5 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (45 cm vs 40 cm).
    45 cm vs 40 cm
  • 38.7% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.5 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.51 kg vs 1.089 kg

Third-party reviews

What customers like about SARO XM-12

  • Commercial-grade build quality and durability
  • Powerful 240W motor that handles continuous use without overheating
  • Highly precise variable speed control ranging from 1,500 to 15,000 RPM
  • Compact and lightweight design that fits easily into a drawer
  • Removable stainless steel blending shaft allows for easy, tool-free cleaning
  • Ergonomic bi-material handle grip that minimizes hand fatigue during long shifts
  • Large liquid capacity capable of processing batches up to 10.6 quarts (10 liters)
  • Efficient anti-splash blade guard hood design

What customers don't like about SARO XM-12

  • The detachable blending arm is not dishwasher safe and must be washed under the tap
  • Higher price point compared to standard residential immersion blenders
  • May be louder than household-designed alternatives due to its commercial-grade motor
  • Designed primarily for professional kitchen operations, which might be overkill for casual home use

Verdict

The XM-12 is a professional, compact commercial immersion blender featuring a 240-watt (1/3 HP) motor, a variable speed system ranging from 1,500 to 15,000 RPM, and an 8.8-inch (223 mm) detachable stainless steel shaft designed to work in containers up to 10 liters (10.6 quarts). Key characteristics include a tempered steel tri-blade system, an anti-splash blade guard, an ergonomic anti-slip grip, and a SmoothControl system that improves speed stability. Its main pros are its tool-free detachable arm for easy cleaning, lightweight design weighing just 1.51 kg, and professional performance built for continuous daily prep without overheating. However, its main cons are that it is strictly limited to light-to-standard-duty applications with a maximum 10-liter volume capacity, and the detachable blending arm is not recommended for dishwasher use.

Compare SARO XM-12 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of SARO XM-12 and other immersion blenders

No results found