OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Bamix M200 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£200Power:200 WCordless:noWeight:0.94 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:no

Bamix M200 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Bamix M200
7.0/10

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components

65%

6.0

Technical score

25%

9.0

User score

10%

8.3

List score

▼Worse than 54% of immersion blenders
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

6.0

Price

▼Worse than 82%
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components

45%

4.9

Performance

20%

7.4

Accessories

15%

6.4

Design

10%

4.0

Usability

10%

9.8

Dimensions

▼Worse than 66%
9.0

User score

User score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 78% of models

70%

9.0

Rating

30%

8.9

Popularity

▲Better than 78%
8.3

List score

List score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 29 lists (3%)
★Better than 90%
  • bamix-m200
  • bamix-m200
  • bamix-m200
  • bamix-m200
  • bamix-m200
  • bamix-m200
bamix-m200
bamix-m200
bamix-m200
bamix-m200
bamix-m200
bamix-m200
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What owners say about the Bamix M200

Based on 16 owners sharing their experience in online comments

56%positive6%mixed38%negative

Owners praise its durable, steady performance; complaints focus on high price, uneven results, and a cheap feel.

What owners dislike

  • Owners find the 200-watt motor underpowered for the price, saying it feels weak next to other brands' 700-watt blenders.4
  • Owners say dates and finely cut meat grind poorly, and egg whites whip stiff and uneven, unlike a hand whisk.3
  • Owners say purée leaves small bits, the grater leaves a large unshredded piece, and nuts and spices can fly out of the beaker.3
  • Owners say it feels cheap, comparing it to budget Chinese appliances, and report a smell from the body after grinding chickpeas.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Immersion Blenders model ranking

Ranked #329 of 725 models in Immersion Blenders (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Bamix M200

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components:

45%

4.9

Performance

20%

7.4

Accessories

15%

6.4

Design

10%

4.0

Usability

10%

9.8

Dimensions

6.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components:

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

6.0

Price

6.7
Power
200 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 200 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 87.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.1% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
17,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 17,000 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 83.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
no
This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
3
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
?
Chopper capacity
?
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
600 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 600 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 53.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 38.2% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Nylon
Detachable shaft
no
This immersion blender does not support a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1.8 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.8 m, which is longer reach than 83.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.2% of immersion blenders.
Weight
0.94 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.94 kg, which is lighter in hand than 65.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.7% of immersion blenders.
Height
34.5 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 34.5 cm in height, which is more compact than 86% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.8% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Bamix M200 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 2,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (17,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    17,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 0.6 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (1.8 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.8 m vs 1.2 m
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • Includes the storage stand
    This immersion blender includes the storage stand while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 5.5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (34.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    34.5 cm vs 40 cm
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 13.9% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 78% of models

    70%

    9.0

    Rating

    30%

    8.9

    Popularity

    9.0 vs 7.9
  • 13.7% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.9 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.94 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 13.9% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 78% of models

    70%

    9.0

    Rating

    30%

    8.9

    Popularity

    9.0 vs 7.9
  • 2,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (17,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    17,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • Includes the storage stand
    This immersion blender includes the storage stand while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 0.6 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (1.8 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.8 m vs 1.2 m
  • 5.5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (34.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    34.5 cm vs 40 cm
  • 13.7% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.9 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.94 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 500 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (200 W vs 700 W).
    200 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • Does not support a detachable shaft
    This immersion blender does not support a detachable shaft while the average immersion blender does.
  • 4.44x more expensive
    Bamix M200 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£200 vs £45).
    £200 vs £45
  • 15.1% worse value for money
    Bamix M200 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.71 vs 7.7).
    6.71 vs 7.73
  • 4.44x more expensive
    Bamix M200 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£200 vs £45).
    £200 vs £45
  • 15.1% worse value for money
    Bamix M200 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.71 vs 7.7).
    6.71 vs 7.73
  • 2.4% lower list score
    List score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 29 lists (3%)
    8.3 vs 8.5
  • 500 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (200 W vs 700 W).
    200 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a detachable shaft
    This immersion blender does not support a detachable shaft while the average immersion blender does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Shop video

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Bamix M200

  • Excellent build quality and durability, often lasting for years
  • Powerful 200W AC motor that efficiently transfers energy without overheating
  • Versatile performance with interchangeable blades for whisking, puréeing, and chopping
  • Creates a powerful vortex that effortlessly creates smooth emulsions, soups, and sauces
  • Easy to clean quickly by simply rinsing the wand under running water
  • Ergonomic handle that feels comfortable, balanced, and secure to hold
  • Highly temperature resistant and waterproof, making it safe to blend directly in hot pots

What customers don't like about Bamix M200

  • Significantly more expensive than standard residential immersion blenders
  • The blending shaft is non-detachable, meaning it cannot be placed in the dishwasher
  • Can struggle to smoothly process highly fibrous greens or tough ingredients like thick nut butters
  • The intense power can cause splattering when blending smaller portions or shallow batches
  • Only offers two speed settings, lacking variable speed control
  • Some users report poor experiences with regional customer service departments

Verdict

The Bamix M200 is a premium, Swiss-made immersion blender powered by a heavy-duty, energy-efficient 200-watt AC motor operating at two speed settings of 12,000 and 17,000 RPM (up to 18,000 RPM depending on the configuration). Crafted with a heat-resistant PA6 nylon housing and chromated brass shaft, it safely handles tasks directly in boiling liquids and features an open-head guard design that creates a vortex for splatter-free processing. Main characteristics and pros include its exceptional high-torque blending capacity, commercial-grade longevity backed by a lifetime motor guarantee, waterproof soft-grip membrane switches, and a versatile package equipped with interchangeable stainless steel attachments such as a multi-purpose star knife, whisk disc, and mixing disc. However, notable cons include its high premium price point, an exposed blade area that demands cautious handling, and a non-detachable blending foot that makes cleaning slightly more restrictive as it cannot be placed in the dishwasher.

Compare Bamix M200 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Bamix M200 and other immersion blenders

No results found