OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Russell Hobbs MX3100RDR Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Power:275 WCordless:noWeight:1.04 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:no

Russell Hobbs MX3100RDR Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Russell Hobbs MX3100RDR
7.3/10

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

65%

6.5

Technical score

25%

9.3

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 55% of immersion blenders
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

â–²Better than 60%
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components

45%

5.6

Performance

20%

7.2

Accessories

15%

8.3

Design

10%

4.0

Usability

10%

9.2

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 53%
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models

70%

9.0

Rating

30%

9.9

Popularity

★Better than 91%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • russell-hobbs-mx3100rdr
  • russell-hobbs-mx3100rdr
  • russell-hobbs-mx3100rdr
  • russell-hobbs-mx3100rdr
  • russell-hobbs-mx3100rdr
  • russell-hobbs-mx3100rdr
  • russell-hobbs-mx3100rdr
  • russell-hobbs-mx3100rdr
russell-hobbs-mx3100rdr
russell-hobbs-mx3100rdr
russell-hobbs-mx3100rdr
russell-hobbs-mx3100rdr
russell-hobbs-mx3100rdr
russell-hobbs-mx3100rdr
russell-hobbs-mx3100rdr
russell-hobbs-mx3100rdr
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Russell Hobbs MX3100RDR

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components:

45%

5.6

Performance

20%

7.2

Accessories

15%

8.3

Design

10%

4.0

Usability

10%

9.2

Dimensions

6.5
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components:

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

8.0
Power
275 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 275 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 83.4% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
4
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 4 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 56.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.2% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
20,500 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 20,500 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 96.8% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
no
This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
3
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
?
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
?
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
?
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
?
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
?
Weight
1.04 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.04 kg, which is lighter in hand than 50.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.5% of immersion blenders.
Height
10 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 10 cm in height, which is more compact than 99.9% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Russell Hobbs MX3100RDR vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 6,000 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (20,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    20,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 30 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (10 cm vs 40 cm).
    10 cm vs 40 cm
  • Includes the double beater
    This immersion blender includes the double beater while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 17.7% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ★ Better than 91% of models

    70%

    9.0

    Rating

    30%

    9.9

    Popularity

    9.3 vs 7.9
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 2 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (4 vs 2).
    4 vs 2
  • 28.6% cheaper
    Russell Hobbs MX3100RDR is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£35 vs £45).
    £35 vs £45
  • 3.9% better value for money
    Russell Hobbs MX3100RDR has better value for money than the average immersion blender (8.02 vs 7.7).
    8.02 vs 7.73
  • 17.7% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ★ Better than 91% of models

    70%

    9.0

    Rating

    30%

    9.9

    Popularity

    9.3 vs 7.9
  • 28.6% cheaper
    Russell Hobbs MX3100RDR is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£35 vs £45).
    £35 vs £45
  • 3.9% better value for money
    Russell Hobbs MX3100RDR has better value for money than the average immersion blender (8.02 vs 7.7).
    8.02 vs 7.73
  • 6,000 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (20,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    20,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 2 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (4 vs 2).
    4 vs 2
  • Includes the double beater
    This immersion blender includes the double beater while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 30 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (10 cm vs 40 cm).
    10 cm vs 40 cm
  • 4.5% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.04 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 425 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (275 W vs 700 W).
    275 W vs 700 W
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • 425 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (275 W vs 700 W).
    275 W vs 700 W
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Russell Hobbs MX3100RDR

  • Aesthetically pleasing retro style design with a vibrant red color finish
  • Ergonomic soft-touch handle provides a comfortable and secure grip
  • Durable construction featuring robust stainless steel materials
  • Comes with practical, dishwasher-safe attachments including a beaker and chopper
  • Offers good value for money compared to similar retro kitchen appliances

What customers don't like about Russell Hobbs MX3100RDR

  • The 275-watt motor can struggle or take extra time with very thick ingredients
  • Can be quite noisy and prone to vibration when used at higher speed settings
  • Plastic joining pieces can wear down or damage under prolonged heavy strain
  • Limited speed versatility compared to modern multi-speed immersion blenders
  • Replacement parts can be difficult or impossible to source through customer service

Verdict

The Russell Hobbs MX3100RDR is actually a retro-style electric hand mixer rather than an immersion blender, featuring a 275-watt motor, 4 speed settings, and a Turbo Boost function wrapped in a vintage red design. Its main characteristics and pros include an ergonomic soft-touch handle for comfortable gripping, a mess-free attachment eject button, dishwasher-safe removable parts, and a versatile accessory kit containing two traditional beaters, two dough hooks, and a whisk attachment. On the downside, its 275-watt power capacity is lower than heavy-duty stand mixers, meaning it may struggle or slow down when working with exceptionally thick, heavy doughs.

Compare Russell Hobbs MX3100RDR with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Russell Hobbs MX3100RDR and other immersion blenders

No results found