OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Mastro 400W 600mm Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£260Power:400 WCordless:noWeight:4.4 kgStepless variable speed:yesDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Mastro 400W 600mm Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1/10

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

65%

5.2

Technical score

25%

?

User scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 8.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 84% of immersion blenders
5.7

Value for money

Value for money
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

4.7

Price

â–¼Worse than 92%
5.2

Technical score

Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

45%

5.4

Performance

20%

3.3

Accessories

15%

8.3

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

2.8

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 89%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
No ratings from across the web yet, so it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
No ratings from across the web yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £260
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Mastro 400W 600mm

Technical score
Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components:

45%

5.4

Performance

20%

3.3

Accessories

15%

8.3

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

2.8

Dimensions

5.2
Value for money
Value for money
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components:

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

4.7

Price

5.7
Power
400 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 400 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 69.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 4.7% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
?
Stepless variable speed
yes
This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
11,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 11,000 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 91.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
yes
This immersion blender designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
0
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 0 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 79.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.2% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
?
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
?
Weight
4.4 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 4.4 kg, which is heavier in hand than 96.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.1% of immersion blenders.
Height
89 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 89 cm in height, which is taller than 99.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.1% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Mastro 400W 600mm vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 3,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (11,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    11,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 300 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (400 W vs 700 W).
    400 W vs 700 W
  • 4.04x heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (4.4 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    4.4 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 49 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (89 cm vs 40 cm).
    89 cm vs 40 cm
  • 35.8% worse value for money
    Mastro 400W 600mm has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (5.69 vs 7.7).
    5.69 vs 7.73
  • 5.78x more expensive
    Mastro 400W 600mm is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£260 vs £45).
    £260 vs £45
  • 3,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (11,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    11,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 300 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (400 W vs 700 W).
    400 W vs 700 W
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 4.04x heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (4.4 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    4.4 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 49 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (89 cm vs 40 cm).
    89 cm vs 40 cm

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Mastro 400W 600mm

  • Equipped with an extra-long 600mm professional shaft suitable for deep, large-volume catering pots.
  • Features a variable speed control dial for precise adjustments according to the recipe's texture needs.
  • Detachable stainless steel blending arm allows for convenient and easy cleaning after use.
  • Ergonomic handle design assists in reducing hand fatigue during prolonged commercial operations.

What customers don't like about Mastro 400W 600mm

  • The 400W motor can feel slightly underpowered or slow when processing very dense or thick mixtures at full length.
  • The combined unit is top-heavy and notably long (close to 1 meter in total), making it cumbersome to maneuver for some users.
  • Main power unit/motor housing is not waterproof and must only be wiped down manually with a damp cloth.

Verdict

The Mastro immersion blender features a 400W motor paired with an extra-long 600mm stainless steel shaft, making it uniquely optimized for processing large volumes of food in deep commercial pots. Main characteristics include its durable, high-capacity construction and an extended reach that serves as a primary pro for industrial or heavy-duty catering environments, ensuring efficient blending of soups, purees, and sauces directly on the hob. However, a potential con is that its extensive 600mm length and heavy-duty frame make it less practical, bulky to handle, and difficult to store for standard residential kitchens, while the 400W power rating may find limitations when continuously processing exceptionally dense or highly fibrous ingredients compared to higher-wattage commercial alternatives.

Compare Mastro 400W 600mm with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Mastro 400W 600mm and other immersion blenders

No results found