OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

KitchenAid KHBRV00 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Power:60 WCordless:yesWeight:0.816 kgStepless variable speed:yesDishwasher-safe parts:yes

KitchenAid KHBRV00 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications and 2 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

KitchenAid KHBRV00
7.2/10

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components

65%

7.2

Technical score

25%

7.2

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 52% of immersion blenders
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

â–¼Worse than 69%
7.2

Technical score

Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components

45%

6.4

Performance

20%

6.0

Accessories

15%

8.4

Design

10%

8.7

Usability

10%

9.7

Dimensions

â–²Better than 61%
7.2

User score

User score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models

7.2

Mark 8.5 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.6

Rating

30%

8.1

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 72%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • kitchenaid-khbrv00
  • kitchenaid-khbrv00
  • kitchenaid-khbrv00
  • kitchenaid-khbrv00
  • kitchenaid-khbrv00
  • kitchenaid-khbrv00
  • kitchenaid-khbrv00
kitchenaid-khbrv00
kitchenaid-khbrv00
kitchenaid-khbrv00
kitchenaid-khbrv00
kitchenaid-khbrv00
kitchenaid-khbrv00
kitchenaid-khbrv00
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender KitchenAid KHBRV00

Technical score
Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components:

45%

6.4

Performance

20%

6.0

Accessories

15%

8.4

Design

10%

8.7

Usability

10%

9.7

Dimensions

7.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

7.6

Price

7.3
Power
60 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 60 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 99.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.1% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
?
Stepless variable speed
yes
This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
18,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 18,000 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 87.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
yes
This immersion blender supports cordless operation.
Battery type
Lithium-ion
Show more
Number of accessories
3
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
700 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 700 ml, which is larger than the cup of 47% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 21% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
-
Weight
0.816 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.816 kg, which is lighter in hand than 79.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.5% of immersion blenders.
Height
37.8 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 37.8 cm in height, which is more compact than 73.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.8% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
3.11x 2.76

KitchenAid KHBRV00 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 3,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (18,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    18,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 5 min longer battery runtime
    This immersion blender powers through multiple consecutive pots of soup and bowl purees without dying mid-recipe compared to the average immersion blender (30 min vs 25 min).
    30 min vs 25 min
  • 25.1% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.8 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.816 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 3,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (18,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    18,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 5 min longer battery runtime
    This immersion blender powers through multiple consecutive pots of soup and bowl purees without dying mid-recipe compared to the average immersion blender (30 min vs 25 min).
    30 min vs 25 min
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 25.1% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.8 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.816 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 2.2 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (37.8 cm vs 40 cm).
    37.8 cm vs 40 cm
  • 640 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (60 W vs 700 W).
    60 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 50 min slower charging time
    This immersion blender remains tied to the charging dock longer before restoring full wireless operation compared to the average immersion blender (180 min vs 130 min).
    180 min vs 130 min
  • 8.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models

    7.2

    Mark 8.5 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    8.1

    Popularity

    7.2 vs 7.9
  • 2.89x more expensive
    KitchenAid KHBRV00 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£130 vs £45).
    £130 vs £45
  • 5.5% worse value for money
    KitchenAid KHBRV00 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.32 vs 7.7).
    7.32 vs 7.73
  • 8.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models

    7.2

    Mark 8.5 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    8.1

    Popularity

    7.2 vs 7.9
  • 2.89x more expensive
    KitchenAid KHBRV00 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£130 vs £45).
    £130 vs £45
  • 5.5% worse value for money
    KitchenAid KHBRV00 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.32 vs 7.7).
    7.32 vs 7.73
  • 640 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (60 W vs 700 W).
    60 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 50 min slower charging time
    This immersion blender remains tied to the charging dock longer before restoring full wireless operation compared to the average immersion blender (180 min vs 130 min).
    180 min vs 130 min
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
21/07/2024
Hands-on review · Cordless hand blender
Verdict
The KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender blends like a corded model and needs no power outlet, though its pan guard breaks easily.
9.0
idealhome.co.uk
✓ explicit
29/06/2024
Hands-on test · Battery-powered blending
Verdict
The KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender is expensive, but it suits kitchens with few power sockets, since it runs on a removable battery and offers whisk and chopper attachments.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about KitchenAid KHBRV00

  • Cordless design provides excellent mobility and kitchen flexibility without cord limitations.
  • Powerful motor that efficiently purees fibrous ingredients, hot soups, and single-serve smoothies.
  • Variable speed trigger gives precise, intuitive control over blending intensity.
  • Operates quietly compared to many standard or corded immersion blenders.
  • Comes with a helpful removable pan guard to protect non-stick cookware from scratches.
  • Features a solid, durable build quality with an ergonomic and comfortable matte handle.
  • The 12V Max battery is part of the KitchenAid Go system and is interchangeable with other appliances in the line.

What customers don't like about KitchenAid KHBRV00

  • The required 12V Max battery is sold separately for the base KHBRV00 model, increasing the total cost.
  • Struggles with heavy-duty tasks like crushing ice or making thick nut butters.
  • Blending large batches of thick or fibrous ingredients can lead to a less smooth consistency and a slower process.
  • Relatively short continuous battery runtime of around 20 to 30 minutes per full charge.
  • Requires a long recharging time of roughly 2 to 2.5 hours when the battery is completely drained.
  • Safety lock mechanism requires squeezing two buttons simultaneously, which some users find awkward or tiring during extended use.
  • The base unit package includes minimal accessories, lacking add-ons like a whisk or chopper attachment out of the box.

Verdict

The KitchenAid Go Cordless Hand Blender (Model KHBRV00) is a portable immersion blender powered by an interchangeable 12V MAX removable lithium-ion battery (sold separately, model KRB12) that delivers up to 30 minutes of continuous runtime. It features a 7-inch removable dishwasher-safe stainless steel blending arm equipped with a 4-point blade design, an ergonomic variable-speed trigger switch for one-handed control, and a patented removable pan guard to protect cookware from scratches. Main pros include its cordless mobility for unrestricted kitchen use, a convenient 3-cup (700 mL) BPA-free blending jar with a lid, and efficient blending performance on hot soups or fibrous ingredients. However, notable cons include its inability to effectively crush ice or process heavy recipes like nut butter and hummus, along with a potential durability concern due to plastic components in the connection between the blending arm and motor body.

Compare KitchenAid KHBRV00 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of KitchenAid KHBRV00 and other immersion blenders

No results found