Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

HENDI Cordless 150W Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90Power:150 WCordless:yesWeight:0.64 kgStepless variable speed:yesDishwasher-safe parts:no

HENDI Cordless 150W Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

HENDI Cordless 150W
5.7/10

Overall score

Score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

65%

5.5

Technical score

25%

5.5

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 94% of immersion blenders
6.5

Value for money

Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.7

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

â–¼Worse than 84%
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

45%

4.1

Performance

20%

3.3

Accessories

15%

8.0

Design

10%

8.3

Usability

10%

9.6

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 82%
5.5

User score

User score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

5.5

Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.3

Rating

30%

5.6

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 94%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • hendi-cordless-150w
  • hendi-cordless-150w
  • hendi-cordless-150w
  • hendi-cordless-150w
  • hendi-cordless-150w
  • hendi-cordless-150w
hendi-cordless-150w
hendi-cordless-150w
hendi-cordless-150w
hendi-cordless-150w
hendi-cordless-150w
hendi-cordless-150w
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender HENDI Cordless 150W

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

45%

4.1

Performance

20%

3.3

Accessories

15%

8.0

Design

10%

8.3

Usability

10%

9.6

Dimensions

5.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.7

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

6.5
Power
150 W
This immersion blender delivers 150 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 97.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.3% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
5
This immersion blender features 5 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 56.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8.7% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
yes
This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
16,000 RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 16,000 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 73.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8.6% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
yes
This immersion blender designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
no
This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
yes
This immersion blender supports cordless operation.
Battery type
?
Show more
Number of accessories
0
This immersion blender comes with 0 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 79.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.2% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Stainless steel, ABS
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
-
Weight
0.64 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.64 kg, which is lighter in hand than 93.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.1% of immersion blenders.
Height
39 cm
This immersion blender stands 39 cm in height, which is more compact than 62.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.9% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
6.5x 6.5

HENDI Cordless 150W vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (16,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    16,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 41.2% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.6 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.64 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 5 min longer battery runtime
    This immersion blender powers through multiple consecutive pots of soup and bowl purees without dying mid-recipe compared to the average immersion blender (30 min vs 25 min).
    30 min vs 25 min
  • 3 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (5 vs 2).
    5 vs 2
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (16,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    16,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 3 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (5 vs 2).
    5 vs 2
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 5 min longer battery runtime
    This immersion blender powers through multiple consecutive pots of soup and bowl purees without dying mid-recipe compared to the average immersion blender (30 min vs 25 min).
    30 min vs 25 min
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 41.2% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.6 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.64 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 1 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (39 cm vs 40 cm).
    39 cm vs 40 cm
  • 550 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (150 W vs 700 W).
    150 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 30.4% lower user score
    User score
    5.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    5.5

    Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.3

    Rating

    30%

    5.6

    Popularity

    5.5 vs 7.9
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 30.4% lower user score
    User score
    5.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    5.5

    Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.3

    Rating

    30%

    5.6

    Popularity

    5.5 vs 7.9
  • 18.4% worse value for money
    This immersion blender has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.53 vs 7.7).
    6.53 vs 7.73
  • 2x more expensive
    This immersion blender is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£90 vs £45).
    £90 vs £45
  • 550 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (150 W vs 700 W).
    150 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about HENDI Cordless 150W

  • Cordless portability allows free movement anywhere in the kitchen
  • Intuitive pressure-sensitive button provides stepless speed control
  • Lightweight and balanced design reduces hand fatigue during long use
  • Detachable stainless steel blending shaft makes cleaning simple
  • Clear battery indicator lights keep track of the remaining charge level
  • Built-in safety feature automatically locks the blade after 3 seconds of inactivity

What customers don't like about HENDI Cordless 150W

  • None of the components or attachments are dishwasher safe
  • 150W motor has lower power limits compared to heavy-duty corded blenders
  • 30-minute maximum runtime requires planning for high-volume prep sessions
  • Safety lock requires frequent unlocking which can feel tedious to some users

Verdict

The HENDI Cordless Stick Blender Smart Pressure features a 150W motor powered by a 2000 mAh, 7.4V rechargeable lithium-ion battery that delivers up to 30 minutes of continuous runtime. Constructed from satin stainless steel and ABS plastic, it measures 39 cm in total length with a 16.5 cm detachable blending shaft and an S-shaped blade. Its primary benefit is the Smart Pressure technology, providing stepless speed adjustment across 5 gears ranging from 11,000 to 16,000 RPM based on finger pressure, alongside a 4-level LED battery indicator and a 3-second automatic safety lock. However, its 150W power may struggle with heavy-duty commercial tasks compared to corded models, and the blending attachment is not dishwasher safe.

Compare HENDI Cordless 150W with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of HENDI Cordless 150W and other immersion blenders

No results found