OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Cuisinart RHB-100 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£95Power:?Cordless:yesWeight:1.3 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:no

Cuisinart RHB-100 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications and 2 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Cuisinart RHB-100
6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

65%

6.2

Technical score

25%

6.2

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 77% of immersion blenders
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 79%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

45%

4.7

Performance

20%

6.4

Accessories

15%

8.4

Design

10%

6.1

Usability

10%

9.1

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 62%
6.2

User score

User score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models

6.2

Mark 8.2 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.3

Rating

30%

8.0

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 85%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • cuisinart-evolutionx-cordless-hand-blender-rhb-100
  • cuisinart-evolutionx-cordless-hand-blender-rhb-100
  • cuisinart-evolutionx-cordless-hand-blender-rhb-100
  • cuisinart-evolutionx-cordless-hand-blender-rhb-100
  • cuisinart-evolutionx-cordless-hand-blender-rhb-100
  • cuisinart-evolutionx-cordless-hand-blender-rhb-100
  • cuisinart-evolutionx-cordless-hand-blender-rhb-100
  • cuisinart-evolutionx-cordless-hand-blender-rhb-100
cuisinart-evolutionx-cordless-hand-blender-rhb-100
cuisinart-evolutionx-cordless-hand-blender-rhb-100
cuisinart-evolutionx-cordless-hand-blender-rhb-100
cuisinart-evolutionx-cordless-hand-blender-rhb-100
cuisinart-evolutionx-cordless-hand-blender-rhb-100
cuisinart-evolutionx-cordless-hand-blender-rhb-100
cuisinart-evolutionx-cordless-hand-blender-rhb-100
cuisinart-evolutionx-cordless-hand-blender-rhb-100
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Cuisinart RHB-100

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components:

45%

4.7

Performance

20%

6.4

Accessories

15%

8.4

Design

10%

6.1

Usability

10%

9.1

Dimensions

6.2
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

6.9
Power
?
Number of speeds
1
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 1 speed levels, which is less adjustable than 79.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
13,800 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 13,800 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 54.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.2% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
no
This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
yes
This immersion blender supports cordless operation.
Battery type
Lithium-ion
Show more
Number of accessories
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 2 attachments, which is more versatile than 44.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 7.8% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
?
Chopper capacity
250 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 250 ml, which is smaller than the mini-chopper of 97.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.8% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
887 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 887 ml, which is larger than the cup of 89% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
no
This immersion blender does not support a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
-
Weight
1.3 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.3 kg, which is heavier in hand than 60.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3.2% of immersion blenders.
Height
34.6 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 34.6 cm in height, which is more compact than 85.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.4% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Cuisinart RHB-100 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 187 ml larger beaker volume
    This immersion blender accommodates larger smoothies and milkshakes without ingredients splashing over the beaker rim compared to the average immersion blender (887 ml vs 700 ml).
    887 ml vs 700 ml
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 5.4 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (34.6 cm vs 40 cm).
    34.6 cm vs 40 cm
  • 10 min faster charging time
    This immersion blender returns to full cord-free readiness sooner between lunch preparations and dinner soups than the average immersion blender (120 min vs 130 min).
    120 min vs 130 min
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 10 min faster charging time
    This immersion blender returns to full cord-free readiness sooner between lunch preparations and dinner soups than the average immersion blender (120 min vs 130 min).
    120 min vs 130 min
  • 187 ml larger beaker volume
    This immersion blender accommodates larger smoothies and milkshakes without ingredients splashing over the beaker rim compared to the average immersion blender (887 ml vs 700 ml).
    887 ml vs 700 ml
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 5.4 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (34.6 cm vs 40 cm).
    34.6 cm vs 40 cm
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 21.5% lower user score
    User score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models

    6.2

    Mark 8.2 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.3

    Rating

    30%

    8.0

    Popularity

    6.2 vs 7.9
  • 5 min shorter battery runtime
    This immersion blender provides less wireless operating time, risking battery exhaustion during elaborate multi-course meals compared to the average immersion blender (20 min vs 25 min).
    20 min vs 25 min
  • Does not support a no-splash design
    This immersion blender does not support a no-splash design while the average immersion blender does.
  • 250 ml smaller chopper volume
    This immersion blender has a smaller mini-chopper bowl, requiring multiple chopping batches for meal prep compared to the average immersion blender (250 ml vs 500 ml).
    250 ml vs 500 ml
  • 1 speed levels fewer
    This immersion blender has fewer speed increments, giving less nuance between gentle stirring and intense pureeing compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 21.5% lower user score
    User score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models

    6.2

    Mark 8.2 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.3

    Rating

    30%

    8.0

    Popularity

    6.2 vs 7.9
  • 11.5% worse value for money
    Cuisinart RHB-100 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.93 vs 7.7).
    6.93 vs 7.73
  • 2.11x more expensive
    Cuisinart RHB-100 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£95 vs £45).
    £95 vs £45
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 1 speed levels fewer
    This immersion blender has fewer speed increments, giving less nuance between gentle stirring and intense pureeing compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 700 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (13,800 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    13,800 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • 5 min shorter battery runtime
    This immersion blender provides less wireless operating time, risking battery exhaustion during elaborate multi-course meals compared to the average immersion blender (20 min vs 25 min).
    20 min vs 25 min
  • 250 ml smaller chopper volume
    This immersion blender has a smaller mini-chopper bowl, requiring multiple chopping batches for meal prep compared to the average immersion blender (250 ml vs 500 ml).
    250 ml vs 500 ml
  • Does not support a no-splash design
    This immersion blender does not support a no-splash design while the average immersion blender does.
  • 19.4% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.3 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.3 kg vs 1.089 kg

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Unboxing Net
≈ estimated
21/08/2021
Unboxing and hands-on test · guacamole, egg whites and charging
Verdict
Cuisinart RHB-100 is an excellent product that can replace many blender and food processor tasks.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
tasteofhome.com
≈ estimated
29/09/2025
Lab test · Cordless stick blender
Verdict
The Cuisinart RHB-100 is a powerful, lightweight cordless blender for soups and whipped cream, but its one speed and tricky start take some getting used to.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Cuisinart RHB-100

  • Cordless design provides high portability and convenience without outlet restrictions
  • Lightweight and ergonomic handle with a rubberized grip minimizes user hand fatigue
  • Includes helpful accessories like a chef's whisk attachment and a 30-ounce beaker
  • Quickly emulsifies salad dressings and makes uniform vinaigrettes, purees, and whipped creams
  • Equipped with a useful LED battery level indicator light
  • Allows for direct hot blending in soup pots on the stove top

What customers don't like about Cuisinart RHB-100

  • Sub-par build quality with a high percentage of plastic components compared to heavy-duty alternatives
  • Struggles significantly with tough blending tasks such as crushing ice or making nut butter
  • Two-button safety lock and power system can feel finicky or annoying to activate
  • Blending attachments and motor shaft components are not dishwasher-safe
  • Cannot be operated or used while actively plugged in and charging
  • Single-speed functionality limits overall user control over different food textures

Verdict

The Cuisinart RHB-100 is a portable, single-speed immersion blender powered by a 7.4-volt lithium-ion battery and a 150-watt motor, providing up to 20 minutes of continuous runtime on a 2-hour USB charge. Key characteristics include its 8.25-inch detachable stainless steel blending shaft, blue LED battery indicator lights, a chef's whisk attachment, and a 30 oz mixing beaker. Main advantages include its cordless design for restriction-free kitchen or travel use, a comfortable rubberized grip, and the ability to safely blend hot liquids. However, notable drawbacks include that its detachable components are not dishwasher safe, it features only one speed setting, and it can struggle with heavy workloads or very fibrous ingredients.

Compare Cuisinart RHB-100 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Cuisinart RHB-100 and other immersion blenders

No results found