OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Cuisinart CSB300 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£150Power:300 WCordless:yesWeight:1.52 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Cuisinart CSB300 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Cuisinart CSB300
6.2/10

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

65%

6.1

Technical score

25%

6.1

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 81% of immersion blenders
6.5

Value for money

Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

7.1

Price

â–¼Worse than 84%
6.1

Technical score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

45%

3.8

Performance

20%

6.9

Accessories

15%

9.2

Design

10%

7.5

Usability

10%

8.7

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 65%
6.1

User score

User score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models

6.1

Mark 8.3 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.6

Rating

30%

7.7

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 86%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • cuisinart-csb300bu
  • cuisinart-csb300bu
  • cuisinart-csb300bu
  • cuisinart-csb300bu
  • cuisinart-csb300bu
  • cuisinart-csb300bu
cuisinart-csb300bu
cuisinart-csb300bu
cuisinart-csb300bu
cuisinart-csb300bu
cuisinart-csb300bu
cuisinart-csb300bu
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Cuisinart CSB300

Technical score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components:

45%

3.8

Performance

20%

6.9

Accessories

15%

9.2

Design

10%

7.5

Usability

10%

8.7

Dimensions

6.1
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components:

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

7.1

Price

6.5
Power
300 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 300 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 79.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.6% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
5
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 5 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 56.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8.7% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
yes
This immersion blender supports cordless operation.
Battery type
Lithium-ion
Show more
Number of accessories
3
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
?
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
-
Weight
1.52 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.52 kg, which is heavier in hand than 74.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.1% of immersion blenders.
Height
30.7 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 30.7 cm in height, which is more compact than 91.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.1% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Cuisinart CSB300 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the potato masher
    This immersion blender includes the potato masher while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 9.3 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (30.7 cm vs 40 cm).
    30.7 cm vs 40 cm
  • 3 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (5 vs 2).
    5 vs 2
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 3 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (5 vs 2).
    5 vs 2
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the potato masher
    This immersion blender includes the potato masher while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 9.3 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (30.7 cm vs 40 cm).
    30.7 cm vs 40 cm
  • 400 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (300 W vs 700 W).
    300 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 22.8% lower user score
    User score
    6.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models

    6.1

    Mark 8.3 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    7.7

    Popularity

    6.1 vs 7.9
  • 5 min shorter battery runtime
    This immersion blender provides less wireless operating time, risking battery exhaustion during elaborate multi-course meals compared to the average immersion blender (20 min vs 25 min).
    20 min vs 25 min
  • 39.6% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.5 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.52 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 19% worse value for money
    Cuisinart CSB300 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.49 vs 7.7).
    6.49 vs 7.73
  • 3.33x more expensive
    Cuisinart CSB300 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£150 vs £45).
    £150 vs £45
  • 22.8% lower user score
    User score
    6.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models

    6.1

    Mark 8.3 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    7.7

    Popularity

    6.1 vs 7.9
  • 19% worse value for money
    Cuisinart CSB300 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.49 vs 7.7).
    6.49 vs 7.73
  • 3.33x more expensive
    Cuisinart CSB300 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£150 vs £45).
    £150 vs £45
  • 400 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (300 W vs 700 W).
    300 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 5 min shorter battery runtime
    This immersion blender provides less wireless operating time, risking battery exhaustion during elaborate multi-course meals compared to the average immersion blender (20 min vs 25 min).
    20 min vs 25 min
  • 20 min slower charging time
    This immersion blender remains tied to the charging dock longer before restoring full wireless operation compared to the average immersion blender (150 min vs 130 min).
    150 min vs 130 min
  • 39.6% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.5 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.52 kg vs 1.089 kg

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Cuisinart CSB300

  • Convenient cordless operation with no trailing cables, making it easy to move around the kitchen or use directly on the hob
  • Versatile 3-in-1 multi-tool capability due to useful included attachments (stainless steel blending arm, balloon whisk, and potato masher)
  • The specialized potato masher attachment works exceptionally well, yielding smooth, restaurant-quality results
  • Offers five different speed settings for better control over recipe textures and consistencies
  • Comes with a useful, sleek desktop charging dock that keeps the appliance organized and ready to use
  • Excellent build quality backed by a reassuring 5-year manufacturer guarantee

What customers don't like about Cuisinart CSB300

  • The required safety/child lock mechanism is awkward to operate and can feel clunky or tiresome during extended use
  • Limited continuous battery run-time of approximately 20 minutes per full 2.5-hour charge cycle
  • Struggles with heavy-duty or tough blending tasks, such as thoroughly crushing large ice cubes or processing thick, fibrous ingredients
  • The top unit is somewhat top-heavy due to the integrated battery weight

Verdict

The Cuisinart CSB300 is a cordless 3-in-1 immersion blender powered by a rechargeable lithium-ion battery that delivers 20 minutes of continuous use from a 2.5-hour charge. It features five speed settings, a battery charge indicator, a built-in safety child lock, and a midnight grey finish with a compact desktop charging dock. Main pros include its highly versatile attachment kit—which consists of an extra-long stainless steel blending arm safe for hot foods up to 100°C, a balloon whisk, and a non-scratch potato masher—as well as the convenience of cord-free portability and dishwasher-safe components. However, notable cons include its limited 20-minute battery runtime per charge, a tendency to produce a slightly grainy texture when handling tough, fibrous ingredients like kale, and a safety power button sequence that some users find clunky or awkward to hold continuously during operation.

Compare Cuisinart CSB300 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Cuisinart CSB300 and other immersion blenders

No results found