OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Bamix Cordless Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£210Power:200 WCordless:yesWeight:0.665 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:no

Bamix Cordless Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Bamix Cordless
5.9/10

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

65%

5.8

Technical score

25%

5.8

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 90% of immersion blenders
5.9

Value for money

Value for money
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

5.8

Price

â–¼Worse than 90%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

45%

4.0

Performance

20%

6.6

Accessories

15%

6.9

Design

10%

6.1

Usability

10%

9.9

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 75%
5.8

User score

User score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

5.8

Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.6

Rating

30%

5.0

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 91%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • bamix-cordless
  • bamix-cordless
  • bamix-cordless
  • bamix-cordless
  • bamix-cordless
  • bamix-cordless
  • bamix-cordless
bamix-cordless
bamix-cordless
bamix-cordless
bamix-cordless
bamix-cordless
bamix-cordless
bamix-cordless
Where to buy
    N/A~ £210
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Immersion Blenders model ranking

Ranked #704 of 725 models in Immersion Blenders (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Bamix Cordless

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components:

45%

4.0

Performance

20%

6.6

Accessories

15%

6.9

Design

10%

6.1

Usability

10%

9.9

Dimensions

5.8
Value for money
Value for money
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components:

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

5.8

Price

5.9
Power
200 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 200 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 87.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.1% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
?
Maximum RPM
13,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 13,000 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 64.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
no
This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
yes
This immersion blender supports cordless operation.
Battery type
Lithium-ion
Show more
Number of accessories
3
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Nylon
Detachable shaft
no
This immersion blender does not support a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
-
Weight
0.665 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.665 kg, which is lighter in hand than 92% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.4% of immersion blenders.
Height
36 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 36 cm in height, which is more compact than 81% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.2% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
6.5

Bamix Cordless vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 38.9% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.7 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.665 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the ice blade
    This immersion blender includes the ice blade while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the storage stand
    This immersion blender includes the storage stand while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 4 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (36 cm vs 40 cm).
    36 cm vs 40 cm
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the ice blade
    This immersion blender includes the ice blade while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the storage stand
    This immersion blender includes the storage stand while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 38.9% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.7 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.665 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 4 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (36 cm vs 40 cm).
    36 cm vs 40 cm
  • 500 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (200 W vs 700 W).
    200 W vs 700 W
  • 26.6% lower user score
    User score
    5.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

    5.8

    Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    5.0

    Popularity

    5.8 vs 7.9
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 5 min shorter battery runtime
    This immersion blender provides less wireless operating time, risking battery exhaustion during elaborate multi-course meals compared to the average immersion blender (20 min vs 25 min).
    20 min vs 25 min
  • 1,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (13,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    13,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Does not support a detachable shaft
    This immersion blender does not support a detachable shaft while the average immersion blender does.
  • 26.6% lower user score
    User score
    5.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

    5.8

    Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    5.0

    Popularity

    5.8 vs 7.9
  • 30.8% worse value for money
    This immersion blender has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (5.91 vs 7.7).
    5.91 vs 7.73
  • 4.67x more expensive
    This immersion blender is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£210 vs £45).
    £210 vs £45
  • 500 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (200 W vs 700 W).
    200 W vs 700 W
  • 1,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (13,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    13,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • 5 min shorter battery runtime
    This immersion blender provides less wireless operating time, risking battery exhaustion during elaborate multi-course meals compared to the average immersion blender (20 min vs 25 min).
    20 min vs 25 min
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a detachable shaft
    This immersion blender does not support a detachable shaft while the average immersion blender does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Bamix Cordless

  • Unprecedented flexibility and freedom of movement due to its cordless design
  • Extremely durable, robust, and solid Swiss-made build quality
  • Highly efficient and quiet brushless DC motor with minimal vibration
  • Ergonomic handle that fits comfortably and securely in the hand
  • Creates a powerful blending vortex that draws food efficiently into the blades
  • Versatile multi-functionality with interchangeable stainless steel blades
  • Quick and easy to clean by hand under running water
  • Safe to submerge directly into hot pots and boiling liquids
  • Fast battery charging time and clear remaining battery life indicators

What customers don't like about Bamix Cordless

  • Very high price point compared to standard corded immersion blenders
  • Slightly heavier unit weight, which can feel bulky or tiring for the wrist over time
  • Struggles to completely smooth out tough, raw fibrous ingredients like kale or broccoli
  • Marginally less power capacity than premium corded counterparts
  • Interchanging the small, detachable blades can be finicky or difficult
  • Not dishwasher safe, requiring manual cleanup of the main unit
  • Does not include a standard blending beaker or jar in the basic package

Verdict

The Swiss-made Bamix Cordless immersion blender features a 200W brushless DC motor paired with a rechargeable lithium-ion battery that provides up to 20 minutes of runtime per charge. The standard model offers two speed settings of 8,000 and 13,000 RPM, while the Plus and Pro versions add a third booster speed up to 15,500 RPM. This 13.6-inch handheld device delivers high torque, rapid speed adjustments, and comes with three interchangeable stainless steel blades (aerating, blending, and chopping) inside a heat-resistant, fully sealed nylon PA6 housing safe for boiling pans. Main pros include its whisper-quiet operation, absolute freedom of cord-free movement, an innovative vertical/horizontal quick-charging dock, and robust build quality that replicates corded performance. However, notable cons include its high price tag compared to market competitors, an electronic limitation on maximum torque during extreme loads like crushing ice, a non-detachable blending shaft that complicates cleaning, and lack of compatibility with the standard SliceSy accessory.

Compare Bamix Cordless with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Bamix Cordless and other immersion blenders

No results found