OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Phyode W Me Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£140Battery life:14 daysScreen size:N/A inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:?

Phyode W Me Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

80%

6.3

Technical score

20%

?

User score

▼Worse than 79% of fitness-trackers
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

20%

5.8

Sports & Navigation

20%

7.1

Battery

18%

4.9

Health

18%

7.0

Display

8%

5.7

Smart Features

8%

6.9

App & Wellness

4%

7.5

Connectivity

4%

7.0

Design & Durability

▼Worse than 78% of fitness-trackers
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Phyode W Me

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

20%

5.8

Sports & Navigation

20%

7.1

Battery

18%

4.9

Health

18%

7.0

Display

8%

5.7

Smart Features

8%

6.9

App & Wellness

4%

7.5

Connectivity

4%

7.0

Design & Durability

6.3
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Phyode W Me has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 58.7% of fitness trackers.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

60%

6.3

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

7.4
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
▲ Better than 40% of models
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Fingertip reading.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
▼ Worse than 48% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
▼ Worse than 35% of models
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
?
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
▼ Worse than 25% of models
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
▼ Worse than 12% of models
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
▼ Worse than 9% of models
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
▼ Worse than 5% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
▼ Worse than 8% of models
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
no
Notifications
no
▼ Worse than 73% of models
This fitness tracker does not support notifications. 73% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
?
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
▲ Better than 59% of models
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
▼ Worse than 1% of models
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
▼ Worse than 20% of models
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
▲ Better than 6% of models
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
▲ Better than 2% of models
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
no
Achievements
no
▼ Worse than 76% of models
This fitness tracker does not support achievements. 76.2% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
?
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
▼ Worse than 34% of models
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
?
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
▼ Worse than 22% of models
Market range: <8 m – >23 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 63.4% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
NFC
no
▼ Worse than 13% of models
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
▼ Worse than 1% of models
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
14 days
Battery life
14 days
▲ Better than 60% of models
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 14 days which is longer than that of 60.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 13.9% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
N/A
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Display
?
Screen size
N/A
Display type
?
Screen resolution
?
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
no
Replaceable watch band
no
▼ Worse than 75% of models
This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band. 74.9% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
25 mm
Show more

Phyode W Me vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Tracks HRV
    HRV tracking
    yes
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This fitness tracker supports HRV tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.9% of fitness trackers support HRV tracking.
  • Smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
  • 4 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    Market range: <5 days – >180 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (14 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    14 days vs 10 days
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
  • ECG support
    ECG technology
    yes
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This fitness tracker supports ECG, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.7% of fitness trackers support ECG.
  • ECG lead type
    ECG lead type
    yes
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This fitness tracker supports advanced ECG leads, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.7% of fitness trackers support advanced ECG leads.
    single-lead ECG.
  • 1 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    1
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Tracks HRV
    HRV tracking
    yes
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This fitness tracker supports HRV tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.9% of fitness trackers support HRV tracking.
  • ECG support
    ECG technology
    yes
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This fitness tracker supports ECG, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.7% of fitness trackers support ECG.
  • ECG lead type
    ECG lead type
    yes
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This fitness tracker supports advanced ECG leads, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.7% of fitness trackers support advanced ECG leads.
    single-lead ECG.
  • 4 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    14 days
    ▲ Better than 60% of models
    Market range: <5 days – >180 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (14 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    14 days vs 10 days
  • Smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
  • 1 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    1
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • No sleep tracking
    Sleep tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 92% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 91.9% of fitness trackers support sleep tracking.
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No step tracking
    Step tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 98% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support step tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 97.7% of fitness trackers support step tracking.
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • No silent alarm
    Silent alarm
    no
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • No weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support weight tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 81% of fitness trackers support weight tracking.
  • No replaceable watch band
    Replaceable watch band
    no
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 74.5% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 2x more expensive
    Phyode W Me is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£140 vs £70).
    £140 vs £70
  • 5.07x less popular
    Phyode W Me has a lower popularity than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 5.1).
    1 vs 5.07
  • 7.6% worse value for money
    Phyode W Me has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (7.36 vs 7.9).
    7.36 vs 7.92
  • No sleep tracking
    Sleep tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 92% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 91.9% of fitness trackers support sleep tracking.
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No silent alarm
    Silent alarm
    no
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • No replaceable watch band
    Replaceable watch band
    no
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 74.5% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 3 older release date
    Release date
    2013
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This fitness tracker was released earlier than the average fitness tracker (2013 vs 2016). The average fitness tracker was released in 2016.
    2013 vs 2016
  • No weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support weight tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 81% of fitness trackers support weight tracking.
  • No exercise diary
    Exercise diary
    no
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    This fitness tracker does not have an exercise diary, while the average fitness tracker does. 91% of fitness trackers have an exercise diary.
  • No BMI tracking
    BMI tracking
    no
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 71% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.
  • No achievements
    Achievements
    no
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support achievements, while the average fitness tracker does. 75.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.
  • Paid app
    Free app
    no
    ▼ Worse than 97% of models
    This fitness tracker does not have a free app, while the average fitness tracker does. 96.2% of fitness trackers have a free app.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
appleinsider.com
18/12/2013
Summary of the review
Review: W/Me wearable wellness monitor and coach
D
doctissimo.fr
04/10/2018
Summary of the review
We tested the W/Me wristband by Phyode", "We reviewed Phyode's W/Me wristband
(Translated)Show original
A
appleinsider.com
18/12/2013
Summary of the review
Review: W/Me wearable wellness monitor and coach
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Phyode W Me

  • Innovative Life Spectrum Analyzer (LSA) that monitors mental state and autonomic nervous system (ANS) age
  • High-quality display with a bright, hidden 120-LED matrix and smooth animations
  • Useful rhythmic breathing coach that provides interactive guidance to reduce stress
  • Long battery life of up to 14 days under normal use
  • Versatile secondary features like a remote camera trigger, phone locator, and social media notifications

What we don't like about Phyode W Me

  • The rigid, arched main structure can be uncomfortable and obtrusive, especially for users with small wrists
  • Top-heavy construction makes the device feel overwhelming during extended wear
  • The vertical LED readout can take some time for users to get used to
  • Lacks certain standard hardware features like integrated GPS and blood oxygen monitoring

Verdict

The Phyode W/Me is a wellness monitor and lifestyle coach that prioritizes stress management and autonomic nervous system (ANS) health over traditional step counting. Key specifications include a hidden 120-LED matrix display, a 7-day battery life, and Bluetooth 4.0 connectivity for iOS and Android compatibility. Its standout characteristic is the Life Spectrum Analyzer (LSA), which utilizes dual silver sensors to measure mental state, breathing patterns, and 'ANS Age.' Main pros include its innovative focus on mental wellness through guided abdominal breathing exercises and its versatile smart features like a remote camera shutter, phone notifications, and a flashlight mode. However, notable cons include its rigid, top-heavy chassis which may feel obtrusive on small wrists, a lack of built-in GPS, and a vertical LED readout that some users find difficult to read at first.

Compare Phyode W Me with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Phyode W Me and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found