OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using eReaders Methodology v1.0
eReaders Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo eReaders Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore eReaders Methodology v1.0

Irex Technologies Digital Reader 1000sw Review | 68 Data compared

Avg. price:~£660Screen size:10.2 inchesPixel density:160 ppiInternal storage:128 GBBattery life:12 hoursSupported bookstore ecosystem:?

Irex Technologies Digital Reader 1000sw Review: Compare 68 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the eReaders category and whether it is worth buying.

4.3

Overall score

Score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the eReader's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best eReaders on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

90%

4.3

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▼Worse than 97% of ereaders
4.3

Technical score

Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the eReader's technical performance, covering key areas such as display quality, reading features, battery life, format support, ecosystem, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare eReaders based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 94% of models
Score components

25%

5.2

Display

22%

5.4

Reading

18%

2.1

Battery

14%

5.9

Hardware

12%

4.2

Connectivity

9%

1.0

Design

▼Worse than 94% of ereaders
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the eReader.
When it matters
When you want to know how an eReader feels in daily reading and how reliable it is for screen comfort, battery life, and library management according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £660

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of eReader Irex Technologies Digital Reader 1000sw

Technical score
Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the eReader's technical performance, covering key areas such as display quality, reading features, battery life, format support, ecosystem, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare eReaders based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 94% of models
Score components:

25%

5.2

Display

22%

5.4

Reading

18%

2.1

Battery

14%

5.9

Hardware

12%

4.2

Connectivity

9%

1.0

Design

4.3
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the eReader.
When it matters
When you want to know how an eReader feels in daily reading and how reliable it is for screen comfort, battery life, and library management according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the eReader.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose an eReader reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Irex Technologies Digital Reader 1000sw has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 72.1% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the eReader's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for an eReader with a good balance between reading comfort, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components:

60%

4.3

Overall score

40%

7.0

Price

5.1
Brand name
Irex
Screen size
10.2 inches
Screen size
10.2 inches
▲ Better than 83% of models
Market range: <5 inches – >10 inches
This ereader has a screen size of 10.2 inches which is larger than 82.8% on this spec and equal to 3.3% of eReaders.
Screen resolution
1024x1280 px
Screen resolution
1024x1280 px
▼ Worse than 57% of models
This ereader uses a screen resolution of 1024x1280 px, which is less sharp than that of 56.6% of eReaders and the same as that of 1.6% of eReaders.
Pixel density
160 ppi
Pixel density
160 ppi
▼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <150 ppi – >300 ppi
This ereader has a pixel density of 160 ppi which is lower than 91.8% on this spec and equal to 1.6% of eReaders.
E-paper display
yes
E-paper display
yes
▲ Better than 2% of models
This ereader uses an e-paper display. 2.5% of eReaders have an e-paper display.
Show more
Supported file types
9
Supported file types
9
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <9 – >24
This ereader supports 9 file types which is fewer than 89% on this spec and equal to 0.9% of eReaders.
PDF reflow support
no
PDF reflow support
no
▼ Worse than 55% of models
This ereader does not offer PDF reflow. 55.4% of eReaders support PDF reflow.
Annotation support
yes
Annotation support
yes
▲ Better than 2% of models
This ereader offers annotation support. 1.6% of eReaders offer annotation support.
Dictionary
yes
Dictionary
yes
▲ Better than 1% of models
This ereader includes a built-in dictionary. 0.8% of eReaders include a built-in dictionary.
Text-to-speech
no
Text-to-speech
no
▼ Worse than 65% of models
This ereader does not offer text-to-speech. 64.8% of eReaders include text-to-speech.
Show more
Battery life
12 hours
Battery life
12 hours
▼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <12 hours – >42 hours
This ereader offers 12 hours of battery life which is shorter than 86.5% on this spec and equal to 3.1% of eReaders.
Battery capacity
1,300 mAh
Battery capacity
1,300 mAh
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <1k mAh – >4k mAh
This ereader has a battery capacity of 1,300 mAh which is lower than 72.7% on this spec and equal to 3.3% of eReaders.
Charging time
5 hours
Charging time
5 hours
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <1 hours – >6 hours
This ereader takes 5 hours to charge which is slower than 95.5% on this spec and equal to 4.6% of eReaders.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
▼ Worse than 7% of models
This ereader does not offer wireless charging. 7.4% of eReaders offer wireless charging.
Internal storage
128 GB
Internal storage
128 GB
★ Better than 94% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >62 GB
This ereader offers 128 GB of internal storage which is more than 94.3% on this spec and equal to 5.7% of eReaders.
RAM capacity
0.128 GB
RAM capacity
0.128 GB
▼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >5 GB
This ereader offers 0.128 GB of RAM which is less than 87.7% on this spec and equal to 11.5% of eReaders.
CPU base clock speed
1x 0.532 GHz
CPU base clock speed
1x 0.532 GHz
▼ Worse than 96% of models
This ereader has a CPU base clock speed of 1x0.532 GHz, which is slower than that of 95.9% of eReaders and the same as that of 3.3% of eReaders.
Operating system
Linux
Operating system
Linux
▼ Worse than 71% of models
This ereader runs Linux, which is less advanced than that of 71.3% of eReaders and the same as that of 8.2% of eReaders.
Memory card slot
yes
Memory card slot
yes
▲ Better than 57% of models
This ereader has a memory card slot. 57.4% of eReaders have a memory card slot.
Show more
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
▲ Better than 7% of models
This ereader connects over Wi-Fi. 6.6% of eReaders have Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 3 (802.11g)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 3 (802.11g)
▼ Worse than 90% of models
This ereader supports Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 3 (802.11g), which is older than that of 90.2% of eReaders and the same as that of 3.3% of eReaders.
Wi-Fi bands supported
2.4 GHz
Wi-Fi bands supported
2.4 GHz
▼ Worse than 43% of models
This ereader supports 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi bands, which is broader than that of 6.6% of eReaders and the same as that of 50% of eReaders.
Bluetooth
yes
Bluetooth
yes
▲ Better than 40% of models
This ereader connects over Bluetooth. 40.2% of eReaders have Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
?
Show more
Weight
530 g
Weight
530 g
▼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <160 g – >480 g
This ereader weighs 530 g which is heavier than 92.6% on this spec and equal to 3.3% of eReaders.
Thickness
11.9 mm
Thickness
11.9 mm
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <6 mm – >11 mm
This ereader is 11.9 mm thick which is thicker than 95.9% on this spec and equal to 1.7% of eReaders.
Height
268 mm
Height
268 mm
▼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <150 mm – >240 mm
This ereader is 268 mm tall which is taller than 96.7% on this spec and equal to 1.6% of eReaders.
Width
217 mm
Width
217 mm
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <100 mm – >200 mm
This ereader is 217 mm wide which is wider than 95.9% on this spec and equal to 1.6% of eReaders.
Water resistance (splashproof)
no
Water resistance (splashproof)
no
▼ Worse than 25% of models
This ereader does not have water resistance against splashes. 25% of eReaders have water resistance against splashes.
Show more

Irex Technologies Digital Reader 1000sw vs the average eReader

246810TotalDisplayReadingBatteryHardwareConnectivityDesign
  • 8x more storage
    Internal storage
    128 GB
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >62 GB
    This ereader offers more internal storage than the average eReader (128 GB vs 16 GB). The average eReader provides 16 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 16 GB
  • 3.2 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    10.2 inches
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <5 inches – >10 inches
    This ereader has a larger screen than the average eReader (10.2 inches vs 7 inches). The average eReader screen size is 7 inches.
    10.2 inches vs 7 inches
  • Memory card slot
    Memory card slot
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This ereader includes a memory card slot, while the average eReader does not. 43.1% of eReaders include a memory card slot.
  • Supports stylus
    Stylus support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This ereader supports a stylus, while the average eReader does not. 38.2% of eReaders support a stylus.
    compatible with Wacom styluses
  • Stylus included
    Stylus included
    yes
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    This ereader includes a stylus, while the average eReader does not. 29.3% of eReaders include a stylus.
    Stylus included in the box.
  • 3.2 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    10.2 inches
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <5 inches – >10 inches
    This ereader has a larger screen than the average eReader (10.2 inches vs 7 inches). The average eReader screen size is 7 inches.
    10.2 inches vs 7 inches
  • Supports stylus
    Stylus support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This ereader supports a stylus, while the average eReader does not. 38.2% of eReaders support a stylus.
    compatible with Wacom styluses
  • Stylus included
    Stylus included
    yes
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    This ereader includes a stylus, while the average eReader does not. 29.3% of eReaders include a stylus.
    Stylus included in the box.
  • 8x more storage
    Internal storage
    128 GB
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >62 GB
    This ereader offers more internal storage than the average eReader (128 GB vs 16 GB). The average eReader provides 16 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 16 GB
  • Memory card slot
    Memory card slot
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This ereader includes a memory card slot, while the average eReader does not. 43.1% of eReaders include a memory card slot.
  • Less advanced E-Ink technology
    E-Ink technology
    Vizplex
    ▼ Worse than 88% of models
    This ereader uses Vizplex E-Ink technology, while the average eReader uses Carta Plus.
    Vizplex vs Carta Plus
  • 3 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    5 hours
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <1 hours – >6 hours
    This ereader charges more slowly than the average eReader (5 hours vs 2 hours). The average eReader charges in 2 hours.
    5 hours vs 2 hours
  • No PDF reflow
    PDF reflow support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 55% of models
    This ereader does not support PDF reflow, while the average eReader does. 54.9% of eReaders support PDF reflow.
  • No front light
    Front light
    no
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    This ereader does not include front light, while the average eReader does. 74% of eReaders include front light.
  • 39.6% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    160 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <150 ppi – >300 ppi
    This ereader has a lower pixel density than the average eReader (160 ppi vs 265 ppi). The average eReader has a pixel density of 265 ppi.
    160 ppi vs 265 ppi
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    This ereader does not have USB Type-C, while the average eReader does. 51.2% of eReaders have USB Type-C.
  • 9 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    12 hours
    ▼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <12 hours – >42 hours
    This ereader offers shorter battery life than the average eReader (12 hours vs 21 hours). The average eReader offers 21 hours of battery life.
    12 hours vs 21 hours
  • 2.49x heavier
    Weight
    530 g
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <160 g – >480 g
    This ereader is heavier than the average eReader (530 g vs 213 g). The average eReader weighs 213 g.
    530 g vs 213 g
  • 3.88x more expensive
    Irex Technologies Digital Reader 1000sw is more expensive than the average eReader (£660 vs £170).
    £660 vs £170
  • 42.3% worse value for money
    Irex Technologies Digital Reader 1000sw has worse value for money than the average eReader (5.12 vs 7.3).
    5.12 vs 7.28
  • 5.44x less popular
    Irex Technologies Digital Reader 1000sw is less popular than the average eReader (1 vs 5.4).
    1 vs 5.44
  • Less advanced E-Ink technology
    E-Ink technology
    Vizplex
    ▼ Worse than 88% of models
    This ereader uses Vizplex E-Ink technology, while the average eReader uses Carta Plus.
    Vizplex vs Carta Plus
  • No front light
    Front light
    no
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    This ereader does not include front light, while the average eReader does. 74% of eReaders include front light.
  • 39.6% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    160 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <150 ppi – >300 ppi
    This ereader has a lower pixel density than the average eReader (160 ppi vs 265 ppi). The average eReader has a pixel density of 265 ppi.
    160 ppi vs 265 ppi
  • No color temperature adjustment
    Color temperature adjustment
    no
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    This ereader does not support color temperature adjustment, while the average eReader does. 51.6% of eReaders support color temperature adjustment.
  • Basic touchscreen technology
    Touchscreen technology
    stylus digitizer
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    This ereader uses stylus digitizer touchscreen technology, while the average eReader uses capacitive.
    stylus digitizer vs capacitive
  • 5 fewer front-light LEDs
    N. of front-light LEDs
    0
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <0 – >35
    This ereader has fewer front-light LEDs than the average eReader (0 vs 5). The average eReader has 5 front-light LEDs.
    0 vs 5
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1024x1280 px
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    This ereader supports lower screen resolution than the average eReader (1024x1280 px vs 1072x1448 px). The average eReader supports 1072x1448 px screen resolution.
    1024x1280 px vs 1072x1448 px
  • No PDF reflow
    PDF reflow support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 55% of models
    This ereader does not support PDF reflow, while the average eReader does. 54.9% of eReaders support PDF reflow.
  • No cloud sync
    Cloud sync support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    This ereader does not support cloud sync, while the average eReader does. 80% of eReaders support cloud sync.
  • 6 fewer supported file formats
    Supported file types
    9
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <9 – >24
    This ereader supports fewer file types than the average eReader (9 vs 15).
    9 vs 15
  • No audiobook playback
    Audiobook playback
    no
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This ereader does not support audiobook playback, while the average eReader does. 72.5% of eReaders support audiobook playback.
  • No text-to-speech
    Text-to-speech
    no
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models
    This ereader does not support text-to-speech, while the average eReader does. 64.2% of eReaders support text-to-speech.
  • No parental controls
    Parental controls
    no
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This ereader does not have parental controls, while the average eReader does.
  • 6 fewer supported languages
    N. of supported languages
    4
    ▼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <4 – >34
    This ereader supports fewer languages than the average eReader (4 vs 10). The average eReader supports 10 languages.
    4 vs 10
  • 3 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    5 hours
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <1 hours – >6 hours
    This ereader charges more slowly than the average eReader (5 hours vs 2 hours). The average eReader charges in 2 hours.
    5 hours vs 2 hours
  • 9 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    12 hours
    ▼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <12 hours – >42 hours
    This ereader offers shorter battery life than the average eReader (12 hours vs 21 hours). The average eReader offers 21 hours of battery life.
    12 hours vs 21 hours
  • 16.9% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,300 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <1k mAh – >4k mAh
    This ereader has a smaller battery than the average eReader (1300 mAh vs 1565 mAh). The average eReader battery has a capacity of 1565 mAh.
    1,300 mAh vs 1,565 mAh
  • 0.38 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    0.128 GB
    ▼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >5 GB
    This ereader has less RAM than the average eReader (0.1 GB vs 0.5 GB). The average eReader has 0.512 GB of RAM.
    0.128 GB vs 0.512 GB
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Linux
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    This ereader uses Linux, a less advanced operating system than Kindle OS on the average eReader.
    Linux vs Kindle OS
  • Slower CPU base clock speed
    CPU base clock speed
    1 x 0.532 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    This ereader has a slower CPU base clock speed than the average eReader (1x0.5 GHz vs 1x1 GHz). The average eReader has a CPU base clock speed of 1x1 GHz.
    1x0.532 GHz vs 1x1 GHz
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    This ereader does not have USB Type-C, while the average eReader does. 51.2% of eReaders have USB Type-C.
  • No Bluetooth audio
    Bluetooth audio support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This ereader does not support Bluetooth audio, while the average eReader does. 57.4% of eReaders support Bluetooth audio.
  • No OTA updates
    OTA updates supported
    no
    ▼ Worse than 82% of models
    This ereader does not support OTA updates, while the average eReader does. 81.7% of eReaders support OTA updates.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 3 (802.11g)
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    This ereader supports an older Wi-Fi version than the average eReader (Wi-Fi 3 (802.11g) vs Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)).
    Wi-Fi 3 (802.11g) vs Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • 2.49x heavier
    Weight
    530 g
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <160 g – >480 g
    This ereader is heavier than the average eReader (530 g vs 213 g). The average eReader weighs 213 g.
    530 g vs 213 g
  • 3.8 mm thicker
    Thickness
    11.9 mm
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <6 mm – >11 mm
    This ereader is thicker than the average eReader (11.9 mm vs 8.1 mm). The average eReader thickness is 8.1 mm.
    11.9 mm vs 8.1 mm
  • 13 older
    Release date
    2008
    ▼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This ereader is older than the average eReader (2008 vs 2021). The average eReader was released in 2021.
    September 2008
    2,008 vs 2,021
  • 89.4 mm wider
    Width
    217 mm
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <100 mm – >200 mm
    This ereader is wider than the average eReader (217 mm vs 127.6 mm). The average eReader width is 127.6 mm.
    217 mm vs 127.6 mm
  • 95 mm taller
    Height
    268 mm
    ▼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <150 mm – >240 mm
    This ereader is taller than the average eReader (268 mm vs 173 mm). The average eReader height is 173 mm.
    268 mm vs 173 mm

Third-party reviews

What we like about Irex Technologies Digital Reader 1000sw

  • Massive 10.2-inch E-Ink display that excels at rendering PDF documents and newspapers at near-actual size
  • High-resolution screen (1024 x 1280) provides crisp, clear text with minimal glare and is easy on the eyes
  • Includes a Wacom touch surface and stylus, making it a strong choice for document viewing and note-taking
  • Features Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity (unlike the base DR1000 model) for easier document management
  • Sleek and lightweight design, often compared to carrying a slim clipboard rather than a bulky book
  • External memory slot (SD card) allows for easy storage expansion of large document libraries

What we don't like about Irex Technologies Digital Reader 1000sw

  • Extremely short battery life for an E-Ink device, typically lasting 12 hours or less on a single charge
  • Prohibitively high retail price ($849 at launch), which many users felt was too expensive compared to consumer readers like the Kindle
  • Requires a stylus for most operations; the screen does not respond to finger touch, and the stylus is easily lost
  • Sluggish performance, including a very slow start-up time (approx. 45–50 seconds) and lag when turning pages
  • Software is prone to bugs, freezes, and crashes according to multiple user reports
  • User interface is often described as cluttered and unintuitive, requiring excessive commands for simple tasks
  • Long charging times (up to 5–12 hours) and lacks a standard AC adapter in the box

Verdict

The iRex Technologies Digital Reader 1000SW is a high-end, business-oriented e-reader featuring a large 10.2-inch E Ink Vizplex display with a resolution of 1024 x 1280 pixels and 16-level grayscale. Its primary characteristics include a Wacom-enabled touchscreen with stylus support for document annotation, 128MB of RAM, and connectivity options like Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. Key pros are its expansive screen—ideal for reading A4-sized PDF documents—and the inclusion of an SD card slot for expandable storage (up to 32GB). However, notable cons include its significant weight of 530g, the absence of a built-in light for dark environments, and a relatively slow screen refresh rate that can cause a lag during drawing or page turns.

Compare Irex Technologies Digital Reader 1000sw with other eReaders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Irex Technologies Digital Reader 1000sw and other eReaders

No results found