OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Camera lenses Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Camera lenses Methodology v1.0

Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye Review | 54 Data compared

Avg. price:~£2,020Lens mount:Canon RFMaximum focal length:5.2 mmMaximum aperture (telephoto end):2.8Optical image stabilization:noMaximum angle of view:190 °

Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye Review: Compare 54 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Camera lenses category and whether it is worth buying.

6.2

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera lens's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best camera lenses on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

80%

6.1

Technical score

20%

6.8

User score

▼Worse than 74% of camera-lenses
6.1

Technical score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components

35%

6.9

Optics & Aperture

24%

8.1

Build & Handling

20%

3.8

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

2.8

Mount & Format

▼Worse than 66% of camera-lenses
6.8

User score

User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

3.8

Number of reviews

Based on 15 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 96% of camera-lenses
  • canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
  • canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
  • canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
  • canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
  • canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
  • canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
  • canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
  • canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
  • canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye
canon-rf-5-2mm-f-2-8l-dual-fisheye

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera lens Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye

Technical score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components:

35%

6.9

Optics & Aperture

24%

8.1

Build & Handling

20%

3.8

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

2.8

Mount & Format

6.1
User score
User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

3.8

Number of reviews

Based on 15 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.8
Popularity
Popularity
3.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When you want to see which camera lenses attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 84% of models
Popularity:
Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye has a popularity score of 3.8 points, which is lower than 83.8% of camera lenses.
3.8
Value for money
Value for money
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera lens's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

60%

6.2

Overall score

40%

1.0

Price

4.6
Lens type
fisheye
Lens mount
Canon RF
Sensor format coverage
Full-frame
Filter thread size
N/A
Teleconverter compatibility
no
Teleconverter compatibility
no
▼ Worse than 15% of models
This camera lens does not support teleconverters. 15.3% of camera lenses support teleconverters.
Show more
Minimum focal length
5.2 mm
Maximum focal length
5.2 mm
Optical zoom
N/A
Maximum angle of view
190 °
Minimum angle of view
190 °
Show more
Focus motor
N/A
Minimum focus distance
0.2 m
Minimum focus distance
0.2 m
▲ Better than 79% of models
Market range: <0.18 m – >1.1 m
This camera lens focuses as close as 0.2 m, which is closer than 79.4% of camera lenses and equal to 7% of camera lenses.
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.03xx
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.03x
▼ Worse than 100% of models
Market range: <0.11 x – >0.39 x
This camera lens reaches a reproduction ratio of 0.03x, which is lower than 99.8% of camera lenses and equal to 0.2% of camera lenses.
Full-time manual focus
no
Full-time manual focus
no
▼ Worse than 68% of models
This camera lens does not support full-time manual focus. 68.4% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
Internal focusing
yes
Internal focusing
yes
▲ Better than 16% of models
This camera lens supports internal focusing. 83.6% of camera lenses support internal focusing.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
▼ Worse than 29% of models
This camera lens does not support optical image stabilization. 29.1% of camera lenses include optical image stabilization.
Stabilization effectiveness (CIPA stops)
N/A
Weight
350 g
Weight
350 g
▲ Better than 68% of models
Market range: <171 g – >1.3k g
This camera lens weighs 350 g, which is lighter than 68.5% of camera lenses and equal to the weight of 0.9% of camera lenses.
Lens length
53.5 mm
Lens length
53.5 mm
▲ Better than 86% of models
Market range: <46 mm – >189 mm
This camera lens is 53.5 mm long, which is shorter than 85.7% of camera lenses.
Lens diameter
121.1 mm
Lens diameter
121.1 mm
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <62.4 mm – >94.7 mm
This camera lens has a diameter of 121.1 mm, which is wider than 96.3% of camera lenses.
Weather sealing (splashproof)
yes
Weather sealing (splashproof)
yes
▲ Better than 50% of models
This camera lens supports weather sealing. 50.2% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
Metal mount
yes
Metal mount
yes
▲ Better than 6% of models
This camera lens uses a metal lens mount. 93.6% of camera lenses use a metal lens mount.
Show more
DxOMark overall score
?
DxOMark sharpness score
?
DxOMark transmission
?
DxOMark distortion
?
DxOMark vignetting
?
Show more

Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye vs the average camera lens

246810TotalMount & FormatOptics & ApertureFocus & ControlsStabilizationBuild & HandlingLab Scores
  • Has drop-in filter support
    Drop-in / rear filter
    yes
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This camera lens supports drop-in or rear filters, while the average camera lens does not.
    Rear gelatin filter holder.
  • 38.75 mm shorter lens
    Lens length
    53.5 mm
    ▲ Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <46 mm – >189 mm
    This camera lens is shorter than the average camera lens (53.5 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    53.5 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • 160 g lighter
    Weight
    350 g
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <171 g – >1.3k g
    This camera lens is lighter than the average camera lens (350 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    350 g vs 510 g
  • Newer release date
    Release date
    2021
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This camera lens was released more recently than the average camera lens.
    2021 vs 2016
  • 0.1 m shorter minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    0.2 m
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <0.18 m – >1.1 m
    This camera lens has a lower minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (0.2 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    0.2 m vs 0.3 m
  • Has drop-in filter support
    Drop-in / rear filter
    yes
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This camera lens supports drop-in or rear filters, while the average camera lens does not.
    Rear gelatin filter holder.
  • 0.1 m shorter minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    0.2 m
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <0.18 m – >1.1 m
    This camera lens has a lower minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (0.2 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    0.2 m vs 0.3 m
  • 38.75 mm shorter lens
    Lens length
    53.5 mm
    ▲ Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <46 mm – >189 mm
    This camera lens is shorter than the average camera lens (53.5 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    53.5 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • 160 g lighter
    Weight
    350 g
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <171 g – >1.3k g
    This camera lens is lighter than the average camera lens (350 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    350 g vs 510 g
  • Newer release date
    Release date
    2021
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This camera lens was released more recently than the average camera lens.
    2021 vs 2016
  • 2 fewer aperture blades
    Aperture blades
    7
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <7 – >9
    This camera lens has fewer aperture blades than the average camera lens (7 vs 9). The average lens has 9 aperture blades.
    7 vs 9
  • No full-time manual focus
    Full-time manual focus
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This camera lens does not support full-time manual focus, the average camera lens does. 68.4% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
  • 2 fewer aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    0
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This camera lens has fewer aspherical elements than the average camera lens (0 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    0 vs 2
  • 44.1 mm wider lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    121.1 mm
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <62.4 mm – >94.7 mm
    This camera lens is wider than the average camera lens (121.1 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    121.1 mm vs 77 mm
  • Fixed lens hood
    Reversible lens hood
    no
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    This camera lens does not include a reversible lens hood, the average camera lens does. 81.4% of camera lenses include a reversible lens hood.
  • 0.16 x lower maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.03 x
    ▼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <0.11 x – >0.39 x
    This camera lens has a lower maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.03 x vs 0.192 x
  • 48.4% worse value for money
    Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera lens (4.64 vs 6.9).
    4.64 vs 6.89
  • 23.4% lower user score
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye
    the average camera lens
    Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye has a lower user score than the average camera lens (6.78 vs 8.360).
    6.78 vs 8.36
  • 48.4% worse value for money
    Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera lens (4.64 vs 6.9).
    4.64 vs 6.89
  • 23.4% lower user score
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye
    the average camera lens
    Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye has a lower user score than the average camera lens (6.78 vs 8.360).
    6.78 vs 8.36
  • 3.81x more expensive
    Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye is more expensive than the average camera lens (£2,020 vs £530).
    £2,020 vs £530
  • 90.7% less popular
    Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye is less popular than the average camera lens (3.82 vs 7.3).
    3.82 vs 7.29
  • 2 fewer aperture blades
    Aperture blades
    7
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <7 – >9
    This camera lens has fewer aperture blades than the average camera lens (7 vs 9). The average lens has 9 aperture blades.
    7 vs 9
  • 2 fewer aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    0
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This camera lens has fewer aspherical elements than the average camera lens (0 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    0 vs 2
  • No full-time manual focus
    Full-time manual focus
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This camera lens does not support full-time manual focus, the average camera lens does. 68.4% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
  • 0.16 x lower maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.03 x
    ▼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <0.11 x – >0.39 x
    This camera lens has a lower maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.03 x vs 0.192 x
  • 44.1 mm wider lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    121.1 mm
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <62.4 mm – >94.7 mm
    This camera lens is wider than the average camera lens (121.1 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    121.1 mm vs 77 mm
  • Fixed lens hood
    Reversible lens hood
    no
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    This camera lens does not include a reversible lens hood, the average camera lens does. 81.4% of camera lenses include a reversible lens hood.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
petapixel.com
30/12/2024
Summary of the review
Canon in 2024: The R5 II Is Canon's Best Mirrorless Camera Yet Would you like to see a list of compatible camera bodies that support this lens's 8K VR...
T
the-digital-picture.com
26/01/2024
Summary of the review
Canon RF 5.2mm F2.8 L Dual Fisheye 3D VR Lens Review
W
webthesis.biblio.polito.it
01/10/2023
Summary of the review
The New Frontier of Immersive Cinema (An Experimental Thesis with Production Testing on the Canon RF 5.2mm)
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 15 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye

  • Unique capability for single-sensor 3D VR180 capture
  • Excellent image quality with professional-grade L-series optics
  • Simplifies workflow by eliminating the need for stitching multiple camera files
  • Compact and lightweight compared to traditional multi-camera VR rigs
  • Fast f/2.8 aperture performs well in various lighting conditions
  • Weather-sealed construction for professional use in challenging environments

What we don't like about Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye

  • Manual focus only, which may be challenging for some users
  • Very niche use case specifically for VR content creation
  • Limited camera compatibility, primarily requiring high-resolution bodies like the EOS R5
  • Requires a paid subscription for Canon's official VR processing software
  • Extremely long rendering times for 8K VR video files
  • Lack of built-in support for some popular formats like Apple Vision Pro without third-party tools

Verdict

The Canon RF 5.2mm f/2.8L Dual Fisheye is a specialized L-series VR lens designed for stereoscopic 3D 180° video capture on full-frame RF-mount cameras like the EOS R5. It features dual 5.2mm fisheye lenses with a 190° field of view and a 60mm interpupillary distance to mimic human vision, projecting two circular images onto a single sensor to eliminate synchronization and stitching issues in post-production. Key specifications include a fast f/2.8 maximum aperture, a 7-blade diaphragm, a 0.2m minimum focus distance, and advanced SWC and fluorine coatings for glare and weather resistance. While it significantly streamlines VR workflows with its single-sensor capture and high-quality optics, it is limited by its manual-focus-only design, lack of optical image stabilization, and the requirement for specialized Canon software or paid subscriptions to process the footage.

Compare Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye with other products in the Camera lenses category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon RF 5 2mm F 2 8L Dual Fisheye and other products in the Camera lenses category

No results found