Scored using Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Camera lenses Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Camera lenses Methodology v1.0

Canon EF 135mm F 2L USM Review | 54 Data compared

Avg. price:~£970Lens mount:Canon EFMaximum focal length:135 mmMaximum aperture (telephoto end):2Optical image stabilization:noMaximum angle of view:18 °

Canon EF 135mm F 2L USM Review: Compare 54 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Camera lenses category and whether it is worth buying.

6.8

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera lens's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best camera lenses on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.8

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 54% of camera-lenses
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

8.2

Optics & Aperture

24%

5.5

Build & Handling

20%

7.3

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

8.2

Mount & Format

â–²Better than 59% of camera-lenses
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £970

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera lens Canon EF 135mm F 2L USM

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

35%

8.2

Optics & Aperture

24%

5.5

Build & Handling

20%

7.3

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

8.2

Mount & Format

6.8
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When you want to see which camera lenses attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon EF 135mm F 2L USM has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 91.7% of camera lenses.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera lens's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.8

Overall score

40%

5.4

Price

6.4
Lens type
telephoto prime
Lens mount
Canon EF
Sensor format coverage
Full-frame
Filter thread size
72 mm
Teleconverter compatibility
yes
Teleconverter compatibility
yes
This camera lens supports teleconverters. 15.2% of camera lenses support teleconverters.
Supports EF 1.4x and EF 2x extenders.
Show more
Minimum focal length
135 mm
Maximum focal length
135 mm
Optical zoom
N/A
Maximum angle of view
18 °
Minimum angle of view
18 °
Show more
Focus motor
ring USM
Minimum focus distance
0.9 m
Minimum focus distance
0.9 m
This camera lens focuses as close as 0.9 m, which is farther than 83.7% of camera lenses and equal to 1.4% of camera lenses.
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.19xx
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.19x
This camera lens reaches a reproduction ratio of 0.19x, which is higher than 45.8% of camera lenses and equal to 5% of camera lenses.
Full-time manual focus
yes
Full-time manual focus
yes
This camera lens supports full-time manual focus. 68.3% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
Internal focusing
yes
Internal focusing
yes
This camera lens supports internal focusing. 83.6% of camera lenses support internal focusing.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
This camera lens does not support optical image stabilization. 29.1% of camera lenses include optical image stabilization.
Stabilization effectiveness (CIPA stops)
N/A
Weight
750 g
Weight
750 g
This camera lens weighs 750 g, which is heavier than 72.2% of camera lenses and equal to the weight of 0.3% of camera lenses.
Lens length
112 mm
Lens length
112 mm
This camera lens is 112 mm long, which is longer than 68.4% of camera lenses and equal to the length of 0.5% of camera lenses.
Lens diameter
82.5 mm
Lens diameter
82.5 mm
This camera lens has a diameter of 82.5 mm, which is wider than 62.6% of camera lenses and equal to that of 0.6% of camera lenses.
Weather sealing (splashproof)
no
Weather sealing (splashproof)
no
This camera lens does not support weather sealing. 50.3% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
Metal mount
yes
Metal mount
yes
This camera lens uses a metal lens mount. 93.6% of camera lenses use a metal lens mount.
Show more
DxOMark overall score
?
DxOMark sharpness score
?
DxOMark transmission
?
DxOMark distortion
?
DxOMark vignetting
?
Show more

Canon EF 135mm F 2L USM vs the average camera lens

246810TotalMount & FormatOptics & ApertureFocus & ControlsStabilizationBuild & HandlingLab Scores
  • Teleconverter compatible
    Teleconverter compatibility
    yes
    This camera lens supports teleconverters, while the average camera lens does not.
    Supports EF 1.4x and EF 2x extenders.
  • 0.8 lower f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    2
    This camera lens has a brighter maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/2 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    2 vs 2.8
  • Has de-clickable aperture ring
    De-clickable aperture ring
    yes
    This camera lens has a de-clickable aperture ring, the average camera lens does not. 18.3% of camera lenses support a de-clickable aperture ring.
    De-clickable aperture ring.
  • Has focus distance scale
    Focus distance scale
    yes
    This camera lens has a focus distance scale, the average camera lens does not. 48.6% of camera lenses include a focus distance scale.
  • Has focus limiter switch
    Focus limiter switch
    yes
    This camera lens has a focus limiter switch, the average camera lens does not. 16.4% of camera lenses include a focus limiter switch.
  • Teleconverter compatible
    Teleconverter compatibility
    yes
    This camera lens supports teleconverters, while the average camera lens does not.
    Supports EF 1.4x and EF 2x extenders.
  • 0.8 lower f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    2
    This camera lens has a brighter maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/2 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    2 vs 2.8
  • Has de-clickable aperture ring
    De-clickable aperture ring
    yes
    This camera lens has a de-clickable aperture ring, the average camera lens does not. 18.3% of camera lenses support a de-clickable aperture ring.
    De-clickable aperture ring.
  • Has focus distance scale
    Focus distance scale
    yes
    This camera lens has a focus distance scale, the average camera lens does not. 48.6% of camera lenses include a focus distance scale.
  • Has focus limiter switch
    Focus limiter switch
    yes
    This camera lens has a focus limiter switch, the average camera lens does not. 16.4% of camera lenses include a focus limiter switch.
  • Not weather-sealed
    Weather sealing (splashproof)
    no
    This camera lens does not support weather sealing, the average camera lens does. 50.3% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
  • 2 fewer aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    0
    This camera lens has fewer aspherical elements than the average camera lens (0 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    0 vs 2
  • 1 fewer aperture blades
    Aperture blades
    8
    This camera lens has fewer aperture blades than the average camera lens (8 vs 9). The average lens has 9 aperture blades.
    8 vs 9
  • 240 g heavier
    Weight
    750 g
    This camera lens is heavier than the average camera lens (750 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    750 g vs 510 g
  • Older release date
    Release date
    1996
    This camera lens was released earlier than the average camera lens.
    April 1996
    1996 vs 2016
  • 0.6 m longer minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    0.9 m
    This camera lens has a higher minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (0.9 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    0.9 m vs 0.3 m
  • 19.75 mm longer lens
    Lens length
    112 mm
    This camera lens is longer than the average camera lens (112 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    112 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • 5.5 mm wider lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    82.5 mm
    This camera lens is wider than the average camera lens (82.5 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    82.5 mm vs 77 mm
  • 7.29x less popular
    Canon EF 135mm F 2L USM is less popular than the average camera lens (1 vs 7.3).
    1 vs 7.29
  • 83% more expensive
    Canon EF 135mm F 2L USM is more expensive than the average camera lens (£970 vs £530).
    £970 vs £530
  • 8.4% worse value for money
    Canon EF 135mm F 2L USM has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera lens (6.35 vs 6.9).
    6.35 vs 6.89
  • 4.5% lower user score
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Canon EF 135mm F 2L USM
    the average camera lens
    Canon EF 135mm F 2L USM has a lower user score than the average camera lens (8.00 vs 8.360).
    8 vs 8.36
  • 1 fewer aperture blades
    Aperture blades
    8
    This camera lens has fewer aperture blades than the average camera lens (8 vs 9). The average lens has 9 aperture blades.
    8 vs 9
  • 2 fewer aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    0
    This camera lens has fewer aspherical elements than the average camera lens (0 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    0 vs 2
  • 0.6 m longer minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    0.9 m
    This camera lens has a higher minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (0.9 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    0.9 m vs 0.3 m
  • Not weather-sealed
    Weather sealing (splashproof)
    no
    This camera lens does not support weather sealing, the average camera lens does. 50.3% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
  • 240 g heavier
    Weight
    750 g
    This camera lens is heavier than the average camera lens (750 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    750 g vs 510 g
  • Older release date
    Release date
    1996
    This camera lens was released earlier than the average camera lens.
    April 1996
    1996 vs 2016
  • 19.75 mm longer lens
    Lens length
    112 mm
    This camera lens is longer than the average camera lens (112 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    112 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • 5.5 mm wider lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    82.5 mm
    This camera lens is wider than the average camera lens (82.5 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    82.5 mm vs 77 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
the-digital-picture.com
08/07/2005
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.com
27/12/2012
Summary of the review
S
shanelongphotography.com
08/05/2020
Summary of the review
P
p4pictures.com
04/04/2022
Summary of the review
W
whatsthebest.co.uk
12/01/2024
Summary of the review
L
lenstip.com
03/10/2011
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
15/07/2013
Summary of the review
D
doctor-speed.de
20/12/2014
Summary of the review
D
davidbertuleit.com
16/10/2024
Summary of the review
M
michaelfiukowski.com
11/04/2018
Summary of the review
P
photoetmac.com
20/12/2012
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.fr
Sans date
Summary of the review
D
dxomark.fr
03/10/2011
Summary of the review
M
monappareilphotopro.fr
07/04/2025
Summary of the review
P
photoexposition.fr
26/11/2013
Summary of the review
D
digitalcamaralens.com
05/07/2025
Summary of the review
P
photo-review.com
14/07/2013
Summary of the review
D
digitalcamaralens.com
05/07/2025
Summary of the review
C
caborian.com
24/04/2005
Summary of the review
D
digitalcamaralens.com
05/07/2025
Summary of the review
J
juzaphoto.com
01/07/2008
Summary of the review
T
tapatalk.com
01/11/2013
Summary of the review
T
tapatalk.com
30/01/2014
Summary of the review
P
photofacts.nl
07/01/2022
Summary of the review
E
eoszine.nl
01/09/2010
Summary of the review
T
theviewfinder.nl
18/02/2016
Summary of the review
T
theviewfinder.nl
01/10/2013
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Canon EF 135mm F 2L USM

  • Outstanding sharpness even wide open at f/2
  • Exceptional bokeh and subject isolation for portraits
  • Fast, accurate, and near-silent USM autofocus
  • High-quality L-series build with a durable metal mount
  • Excellent performance in low-light conditions
  • Lightweight and compact compared to similar telephoto lenses
  • Relatively affordable for professional L-series glass

What we don't like about Canon EF 135mm F 2L USM

  • Lack of built-in image stabilization (IS)
  • Significant vignetting when used at f/2 on full-frame bodies
  • No weather sealing compared to more modern L-series lenses
  • Fixed focal length can be restrictive in tight spaces
  • Long 3-foot minimum focus distance limits close-up work
  • Large, plastic lens hood can feel bulky or dated

Verdict

The Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM is a legendary prime telephoto lens featuring a fast f/2 maximum aperture and an 8-blade diaphragm for exceptional bokeh. Its optical construction includes two Ultra-low Dispersion (UD) elements to minimise chromatic aberrations, paired with a Ring-type Ultrasonic Motor (USM) for near-silent, high-speed autofocus. Renowned for its 'Holy Grail' sharpness and lightweight 750g build, it excels in portraiture and indoor sports. However, it lacks built-in Image Stabilisation (IS) and does not feature modern weather sealing, making it less versatile in handheld low-light or harsh outdoor conditions.

Compare Canon EF 135mm F 2L USM with other products in the Camera lenses category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon EF 135mm F 2L USM and other products in the Camera lenses category

No results found