OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

Taurus 913516 review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£160Motor power:1200 WBowl capacity:5.5 LNumber of speed levels:6Number of included attachments:3Weight:7.87 kg

Taurus 913516 Review: Compare 41 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

Taurus 913516
6.6/10

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

60%

6.2

Technical score

15%

6.2

User score

15%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.7, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 77% of stand mixers
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

â–¼Worse than 59%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components

35%

7.1

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

7.7

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

5.8

Design

10%

9.3

Safety

â–¼Worse than 64%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.7.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
No expert tests yet
6.2

User score

User score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

6.2

Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

7.7

Rating

30%

7.2

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 82%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • taurus-913516
  • taurus-913516
  • taurus-913516
  • taurus-913516
  • taurus-913516
  • taurus-913516
  • taurus-913516
  • taurus-913516
  • taurus-913516
taurus-913516
taurus-913516
taurus-913516
taurus-913516
taurus-913516
taurus-913516
taurus-913516
taurus-913516
taurus-913516
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer Taurus 913516

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components:

35%

7.1

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

7.7

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

5.8

Design

10%

9.3

Safety

6.2
Reviews score
7.7
User score
6.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components:

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

7.3
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
?
Motor power
1,200 W
Market range: <350 W – >1.5k W
This stand mixer delivers 1,200 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated power of 60.7% of stand mixers and equal to that of 14.3% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
6
Market range: <6 – >11
This stand mixer offers 6 speed levels, which is fewer speed settings than on 59.7% of stand mixers and equal to that on 31.6% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
?
Show more
Bowl capacity
5.5 L
Market range: <4 L – >7.6 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 5.5 L, which is larger than the mixing bowl of 59.8% of stand mixers and equal to that of 7.1% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
?
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
?
Display
no
This stand mixer does not have a display. 27.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
buttons
Show more
Number of included attachments
3
Market range: <3 – >6
This stand mixer comes with 3 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 2.8% of stand mixers and equal to that with 65.1% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
Height
41.5 cm
Market range: <28.2 cm – >41.9 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 41.5 cm, which is taller than 86.8% of stand mixers and equal in height to 0.5% of stand mixers.
Width
29 cm
Market range: <21 cm – >40.2 cm
This stand mixer measures 29 cm in width, which is wider than 58% of stand mixers and equal in width to 1.4% of stand mixers.
Depth
44 cm
Market range: <22 cm – >42 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 44 cm, which is deeper than 92.6% of stand mixers and equal in depth to 0.5% of stand mixers.
Weight
7.87 kg
Market range: <3.98 kg – >13.2 kg
This stand mixer weighs 7.87 kg, which is heavier than 52.3% of stand mixers.
Body material
plastic
Show more
Overload protection
?
Safety locking system
?
Automatic shut-off
yes
This stand mixer has automatic shut-off, unlike 57.4%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

Taurus 913516 vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 200 W more motor power
    This stand mixer kneads dense bread doughs and heavy batches with greater torque and ease than the average stand mixer (1,200 W vs 1,000 W).
    1,200 W vs 1,000 W
  • 0.5 L larger bowl capacity
    This stand mixer accommodates larger batch baking, multiple bread loaves, and party-sized frostings than the average stand mixer (5.5 L vs 5 L).
    5.5 L vs 5 L
  • 31.3% cheaper
    Taurus 913516 is cheaper than the average stand mixer (£160 vs £210).
    £160 vs £210
  • 31.3% cheaper
    Taurus 913516 is cheaper than the average stand mixer (£160 vs £210).
    £160 vs £210
  • 200 W more motor power
    This stand mixer kneads dense bread doughs and heavy batches with greater torque and ease than the average stand mixer (1,200 W vs 1,000 W).
    1,200 W vs 1,000 W
  • 0.5 L larger bowl capacity
    This stand mixer accommodates larger batch baking, multiple bread loaves, and party-sized frostings than the average stand mixer (5.5 L vs 5 L).
    5.5 L vs 5 L
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 12.68 cm deeper body
    This stand mixer extends further front-to-back and requires a deeper countertop area than the average stand mixer (44 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    44 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 1 fewer speed levels
    This stand mixer has fewer speed steps and larger jumps between speed settings than the average stand mixer (6 vs 7).
    6 vs 7
  • 6.5 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (41.5 cm vs 35 cm).
    41.5 cm vs 35 cm
  • 19.5% lower user score
    User score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

    6.2

    Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    7.7

    Rating

    30%

    7.2

    Popularity

    6.2 vs 7.7
  • 0.09 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (1 m vs 1.09 m).
    1 m vs 1.09 m
  • 1 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (29 cm vs 28 cm).
    29 cm vs 28 cm
  • 4.9% heavier
    This stand mixer is heavier than the average stand mixer (7.9 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    7.87 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 19.5% lower user score
    User score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

    6.2

    Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    7.7

    Rating

    30%

    7.2

    Popularity

    6.2 vs 7.7
  • 0.9% worse value for money
    Taurus 913516 has worse value for money than the average stand mixer (7.33 vs 7.4).
    7.33 vs 7.4
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 1 fewer speed levels
    This stand mixer has fewer speed steps and larger jumps between speed settings than the average stand mixer (6 vs 7).
    6 vs 7
  • 12.68 cm deeper body
    This stand mixer extends further front-to-back and requires a deeper countertop area than the average stand mixer (44 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    44 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 6.5 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (41.5 cm vs 35 cm).
    41.5 cm vs 35 cm
  • 0.09 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (1 m vs 1.09 m).
    1 m vs 1.09 m
  • 1 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (29 cm vs 28 cm).
    29 cm vs 28 cm
  • 4.9% heavier
    This stand mixer is heavier than the average stand mixer (7.9 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    7.87 kg vs 7.5 kg

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Taurus 913516

  • Powerful 1200W motor capable of handling heavy tasks like dense bread dough up to 2kg
  • Large 5.5-litre stainless steel bowl capacity allows for mixing substantial quantities at once
  • Effective planetary mixing action ensures homogeneous and well-blended mixtures
  • Good value for money offering a solid balance between features, power, and cost
  • Comes equipped with useful automatic programs and a diverse set of baking attachments (whisk, dough hook, flat mixer)

What customers don't like about Taurus 913516

  • Plastic chassis and outer housing feel less robust compared to premium all-metal mixers
  • Operates with a noticeable amount of noise when working under heavier loads
  • Instructions manual can be confusing or contain errors regarding runtime and cooling cycles
  • The bulkier footprint takes up a fair amount of kitchen countertop space

Verdict

The Taurus 913516 Mixing Chef is a high-performance stand mixer featuring a robust 1200W motor and a large 5.5-liter removable stainless steel bowl, making it well-suited for heavy-duty kneading, mixing, and whipping tasks. Driven by a planetarium mixing system that simultaneously rotates the attachment and orbits the bowl, it ensures perfectly homogeneous results across its 6 electronic speeds, 2 automated programs, and turbo/pulse function. Key advantages include a durable gear system, a comprehensive accessory kit (whisk, dough hook, and mixing paddle), and a practical anti-splash lid with an integrated filling aperture for adding ingredients on the go. However, a potential drawback is its relatively heavy footprint and plastic exterior casing, which might feel less premium than fully die-cast metal options.

Compare Taurus 913516 with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Taurus 913516 and other stand mixers

No results found