OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

Smeg SMF03 review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£510Motor power:800 WBowl capacity:4.8 LNumber of speed levels:10Number of included attachments:4Weight:9.18 kg

Smeg SMF03 Review: Compare 41 technical specifications, 6 expert and video reviews and 2 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

Smeg SMF03
7.5/10

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 78% of models
Score components

60%

6.6

Technical score

15%

8.9

User score

15%

8.8

List score

10%

8.3

Reviews score

▲Better than 78% of stand mixers
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

5.7

Price

▼Worse than 78%
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 54% of models
Score components

35%

7.4

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

6.0

Bowl

15%

5.8

Accessories

10%

6.3

Design

10%

10

Safety

▲Better than 54%
8.3

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models

80%

8.1

Average grade

20%

8.9

Popularity

Grades by review (6)
5 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
▲Better than 51%
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 75% of models

70%

9.2

Rating

30%

8.4

Popularity

▲Better than 75%
8.8

List score

List score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (2)
List score: in 2 of 13 lists (15%)
★Better than 94%
  • smeg-smf03
  • smeg-smf03
  • smeg-smf03
  • smeg-smf03
  • smeg-smf03
  • smeg-smf03
  • smeg-smf03
smeg-smf03
smeg-smf03
smeg-smf03
smeg-smf03
smeg-smf03
smeg-smf03
smeg-smf03
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Smeg SMF03

Based on 5 · 1

Reviewers like its stylish retro looks, but agree it is bulky and heavy for the kitchen counter.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer Smeg SMF03

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 54% of models
Score components:

35%

7.4

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

6.0

Bowl

15%

5.8

Accessories

10%

6.3

Design

10%

10

Safety

6.6
Reviews score
8.3
User score
8.9
List score
8.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

5.7

Price

6.9
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
tilt-head
Motor power
800 W
Market range: <350 W – >1.5k W
This stand mixer delivers 800 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated power of 65.6% of stand mixers and equal to that of 8.9% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
10
Market range: <6 – >11
This stand mixer offers 10 speed levels, which is more speed settings than on 65.1% of stand mixers and equal to that on 22.8% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
?
Show more
Bowl capacity
4.8 L
Market range: <4 L – >7.6 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 4.8 L, which is smaller than the mixing bowl of 65.6% of stand mixers and equal to that of 7.1% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
2 kg
Market range: <1.3 kg – >5 kg
This stand mixer has a dough capacity of 2 kg, which is smaller than 56.1% of stand mixers and equal to 14% of stand mixers.
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
?
Display
no
This stand mixer does not have a display. 27.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
lever
Show more
Number of included attachments
4
Market range: <3 – >6
This stand mixer comes with 4 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 68.4% of stand mixers and equal to that with 14% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
Height
37.8 cm
Market range: <28.2 cm – >41.9 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 37.8 cm, which is taller than 72.7% of stand mixers and equal in height to 3.2% of stand mixers.
Width
40.2 cm
Market range: <21 cm – >40.2 cm
This stand mixer measures 40.2 cm in width, which is wider than 89.5% of stand mixers and equal in width to 1.4% of stand mixers.
Depth
22.1 cm
Market range: <22 cm – >42 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 22.1 cm, which is shallower than 84.8% of stand mixers and equal in depth to 2.3% of stand mixers.
Weight
9.18 kg
Market range: <3.98 kg – >13.2 kg
This stand mixer weighs 9.18 kg, which is heavier than 63.6% of stand mixers and equal in weight to 0.5% of stand mixers.
Body material
die-cast aluminium
Show more
What reviewers say
Overload protection
yes
This stand mixer has overload protection, unlike 99.3%.
Safety locking system
yes
This stand mixer has safety locking system, unlike 97.5%.
Automatic shut-off
yes
This stand mixer has automatic shut-off, unlike 57.4%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

Smeg SMF03 vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 31 dB quieter operation
    This stand mixer runs with noticeably less motor whine, creating a more pleasant kitchen environment than the average stand mixer (44 dB vs 75 dB).
    44 dB vs 75 dB
  • 1 more included attachments
    This stand mixer equips you with more versatile tools out of the box without needing extra purchases than the average stand mixer (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • 3 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (10 vs 7).
    10 vs 7
  • Includes a recipe book
    This stand mixer includes a recipe book (yes), while the average stand mixer does not (no).
  • 9.23 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (22.1 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    22.1 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 15.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 75% of models

    70%

    9.2

    Rating

    30%

    8.4

    Popularity

    8.9 vs 7.7
  • Features a retro design
    This stand mixer features a retro design (yes), while the average stand mixer does not (no).
  • 10.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 51% of models

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    8.9

    Popularity

    Grades by review (6)
    5 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    8.3 vs 7.5
  • 15.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 75% of models

    70%

    9.2

    Rating

    30%

    8.4

    Popularity

    8.9 vs 7.7
  • 10.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 51% of models

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    8.9

    Popularity

    Grades by review (6)
    5 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    8.3 vs 7.5
  • 6.0% higher list score
    List score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (2)
    List score: in 2 of 13 lists (15%)
    8.8 vs 8.3
  • 31 dB quieter operation
    This stand mixer runs with noticeably less motor whine, creating a more pleasant kitchen environment than the average stand mixer (44 dB vs 75 dB).
    44 dB vs 75 dB
  • 3 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (10 vs 7).
    10 vs 7
  • 9.23 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (22.1 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    22.1 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • Features a retro design
    This stand mixer features a retro design (yes), while the average stand mixer does not (no).
  • 1 more included attachments
    This stand mixer equips you with more versatile tools out of the box without needing extra purchases than the average stand mixer (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • Includes a recipe book
    This stand mixer includes a recipe book (yes), while the average stand mixer does not (no).
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 200 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (800 W vs 1,000 W).
    800 W vs 1,000 W
  • 12.2 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (40.2 cm vs 28 cm).
    40.2 cm vs 28 cm
  • 2.8 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (37.8 cm vs 35 cm).
    37.8 cm vs 35 cm
  • 0.09 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (1 m vs 1.09 m).
    1 m vs 1.09 m
  • 22.4% heavier
    This stand mixer is heavier than the average stand mixer (9.2 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    9.18 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 16.7% smaller dough capacity
    This stand mixer has a smaller dough capacity than the average stand mixer (2 kg vs 2.4 kg). The average stand mixer has a dough capacity of 2.4 kg.
    2 kg vs 2.4 kg
  • 0.2 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4.8 L vs 5 L).
    4.8 L vs 5 L
  • 2.43x more expensive
    Smeg SMF03 is more expensive than the average stand mixer (£510 vs £210).
    £510 vs £210
  • 6.6% worse value for money
    Smeg SMF03 has worse value for money than the average stand mixer (6.94 vs 7.4).
    6.94 vs 7.4
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 200 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (800 W vs 1,000 W).
    800 W vs 1,000 W
  • 12.2 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (40.2 cm vs 28 cm).
    40.2 cm vs 28 cm
  • 2.8 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (37.8 cm vs 35 cm).
    37.8 cm vs 35 cm
  • 0.09 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (1 m vs 1.09 m).
    1 m vs 1.09 m
  • 22.4% heavier
    This stand mixer is heavier than the average stand mixer (9.2 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    9.18 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 16.7% smaller dough capacity
    This stand mixer has a smaller dough capacity than the average stand mixer (2 kg vs 2.4 kg). The average stand mixer has a dough capacity of 2.4 kg.
    2 kg vs 2.4 kg
  • 0.2 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4.8 L vs 5 L).
    4.8 L vs 5 L

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Ekis Küchenwelt
≈ estimated
28/12/2019
Hands-on test · heavy pizza dough
Verdict
Smeg SMF03 gives a fairly good dough result, though dough sometimes spins without mixing and the safety cut-out is worrying.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
realhomes.com
✓ explicit
16/04/2021
Hands-on test · Everyday baking
Verdict
The Smeg SMF03 is a great buy for keen bakers, giving good cake and bread results, but its size and 8.81kg weight suit a permanent worktop spot.
8.0
tomsguide.com
✓ explicit
11/03/2024
Hands-on test · Baking and cleaning
Verdict
The Smeg SMF03 is a hefty mixer that bakes well and looks good, but you pay a premium over a comparable KitchenAid.
7.0
bbcgoodfood.com
✓ explicit
01/03/2020
Hands-on test · Retro design
Verdict
The Smeg SMF03 is one of the best-looking mixers tested, with a flex beater that gets every scrap of mix, but it is heavy and noisy.
8.0
olivemagazine.com
✓ explicit
07/10/2022
Hands-on test · Cake and dough
Verdict
The Smeg SMF03 is a good pick for cakes, but it feels underpowered for meringue and enriched dough.
8.0
teigwelt.de
≈ estimated
07/03/2022
Hands-on test · Kneading and whipping
Verdict
The Smeg SMF03 is a robust, retro-styled mixer that suits cakes and batter, but firm bread dough wraps around the hook.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Smeg SMF03

  • Iconic 1950s retro aesthetic and premium vintage design
  • Intuitive and smooth 10-speed variable control dial
  • Excellent flex-edge beater effectively sweeps the sides of the bowl
  • Soft start feature prevents ingredients from splashing out
  • Heavy die-cast aluminium build with non-slip feet provides good stability
  • Dishwasher-safe attachments make cleanup easy

What customers don't like about Smeg SMF03

  • Significantly higher price point compared to performance competitors
  • Bulky footprint and heavy chassis make it difficult to move or store
  • Noticeably noisy motor performance during operation
  • Open grooves around the top speed control can catch flour and spills
  • Whisk attachment can be slow to whip egg whites and cream
  • Tilt-head mechanism can experience shaking or bouncing with heavy doughs

Verdict

The Smeg SMF03 is an iconic 50s retro-style stand mixer featuring a durable die-cast aluminum body, an 800-watt direct-drive motor (600-watt in US models), a 4.8-liter (5-quart) polished stainless steel bowl, and a controlled planetary mixing action. Its main characteristics and advantages include 10 variable electronic speed settings with a splash-preventing smooth start function, a standard-included flex-edge beater alongside traditional wire whisk, flat beater, and dough hook attachments, and a front port for versatile optional accessories. However, notable drawbacks include its premium high price point, a heavy footprint that makes it difficult to move, a stiff tilt-head mechanism, and a tendency for the mixer head to struggle and vibrate when handling exceptionally thick or chunky doughs.

Compare Smeg SMF03 with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Smeg SMF03 and other stand mixers

No results found