OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

Schneider SCFP57 review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£180Motor power:1500 WBowl capacity:5.7 LNumber of speed levels:10Number of included attachments:3Weight:10.7 kg

Schneider SCFP57 Review: Compare 41 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

Schneider SCFP57
6.6/10

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

60%

6.2

Technical score

15%

6.2

User score

15%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.7, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 78% of stand mixers
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

8.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 59%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

35%

7.8

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

8.0

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

6.0

Design

10%

6.2

Safety

â–¼Worse than 65%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.7.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
No expert tests yet
6.2

User score

User score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

6.2

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.7

Rating

30%

5.4

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 82%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • schneider-scfp57b
  • schneider-scfp57b
  • schneider-scfp57b
  • schneider-scfp57b
  • schneider-scfp57b
  • schneider-scfp57b
  • schneider-scfp57b
schneider-scfp57b
schneider-scfp57b
schneider-scfp57b
schneider-scfp57b
schneider-scfp57b
schneider-scfp57b
schneider-scfp57b
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer Schneider SCFP57

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components:

35%

7.8

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

8.0

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

6.0

Design

10%

6.2

Safety

6.2
Reviews score
7.7
User score
6.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components:

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

8.9

Price

7.3
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
tilt-head
Motor power
1,500 W
Market range: <350 W – >1.5k W
This stand mixer delivers 1,500 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated power of 83% of stand mixers and equal to that of 7.1% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
10
Market range: <6 – >11
This stand mixer offers 10 speed levels, which is more speed settings than on 65.1% of stand mixers and equal to that on 22.8% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
?
Show more
Bowl capacity
5.7 L
Market range: <4 L – >7.6 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 5.7 L, which is larger than the mixing bowl of 67.9% of stand mixers and equal to that of 0.5% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
?
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
?
Display
no
This stand mixer does not have a display. 27.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
dial
Show more
Number of included attachments
3
Market range: <3 – >6
This stand mixer comes with 3 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 2.8% of stand mixers and equal to that with 65.1% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
Height
38 cm
Market range: <28.2 cm – >41.9 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 38 cm, which is taller than 76.4% of stand mixers and equal in height to 2.3% of stand mixers.
Width
37 cm
Market range: <21 cm – >40.2 cm
This stand mixer measures 37 cm in width, which is wider than 74.9% of stand mixers and equal in width to 1.4% of stand mixers.
Depth
21 cm
Market range: <22 cm – >42 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 21 cm, which is shallower than 93.1% of stand mixers and equal in depth to 1.8% of stand mixers.
Weight
10.7 kg
Market range: <3.98 kg – >13.2 kg
This stand mixer weighs 10.7 kg, which is heavier than 78% of stand mixers and equal in weight to 0.5% of stand mixers.
Body material
die-cast metal
Show more
Overload protection
yes
This stand mixer has overload protection, unlike 99.3%.
Safety locking system
yes
This stand mixer has safety locking system, unlike 97.5%.
Automatic shut-off
no
This stand mixer does not have automatic shut-off, unlike 42.2%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

Schneider SCFP57 vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 500 W more motor power
    This stand mixer kneads dense bread doughs and heavy batches with greater torque and ease than the average stand mixer (1,500 W vs 1,000 W).
    1,500 W vs 1,000 W
  • 3 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (10 vs 7).
    10 vs 7
  • 10.33 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (21 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    21 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 0.7 L larger bowl capacity
    This stand mixer accommodates larger batch baking, multiple bread loaves, and party-sized frostings than the average stand mixer (5.7 L vs 5 L).
    5.7 L vs 5 L
  • Features a retro design
    This stand mixer features a retro design (yes), while the average stand mixer does not (no).
  • 16.7% cheaper
    Schneider SCFP57 is cheaper than the average stand mixer (£180 vs £210).
    £180 vs £210
  • 16.7% cheaper
    Schneider SCFP57 is cheaper than the average stand mixer (£180 vs £210).
    £180 vs £210
  • 500 W more motor power
    This stand mixer kneads dense bread doughs and heavy batches with greater torque and ease than the average stand mixer (1,500 W vs 1,000 W).
    1,500 W vs 1,000 W
  • 3 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (10 vs 7).
    10 vs 7
  • 10.33 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (21 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    21 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • Features a retro design
    This stand mixer features a retro design (yes), while the average stand mixer does not (no).
  • 0.7 L larger bowl capacity
    This stand mixer accommodates larger batch baking, multiple bread loaves, and party-sized frostings than the average stand mixer (5.7 L vs 5 L).
    5.7 L vs 5 L
  • Does not have automatic shut-off
    This stand mixer does not include automatic shut-off (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 5 dB louder operation
    This stand mixer produces more audible motor noise during heavy kneading sessions than the average stand mixer (80 dB vs 75 dB).
    80 dB vs 75 dB
  • 42.7% heavier
    This stand mixer is heavier than the average stand mixer (10.7 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    10.7 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 0.34 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (0.8 m vs 1.09 m).
    0.75 m vs 1.09 m
  • 9 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (37 cm vs 28 cm).
    37 cm vs 28 cm
  • 19.5% lower user score
    User score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

    6.2

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.7

    Rating

    30%

    5.4

    Popularity

    6.2 vs 7.7
  • 3 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (38 cm vs 35 cm).
    38 cm vs 35 cm
  • 19.5% lower user score
    User score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

    6.2

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.7

    Rating

    30%

    5.4

    Popularity

    6.2 vs 7.7
  • 1.7% worse value for money
    Schneider SCFP57 has worse value for money than the average stand mixer (7.27 vs 7.4).
    7.27 vs 7.4
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 5 dB louder operation
    This stand mixer produces more audible motor noise during heavy kneading sessions than the average stand mixer (80 dB vs 75 dB).
    80 dB vs 75 dB
  • 42.7% heavier
    This stand mixer is heavier than the average stand mixer (10.7 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    10.7 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 0.34 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (0.8 m vs 1.09 m).
    0.75 m vs 1.09 m
  • 9 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (37 cm vs 28 cm).
    37 cm vs 28 cm
  • 3 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (38 cm vs 35 cm).
    38 cm vs 35 cm
  • Does not have automatic shut-off
    This stand mixer does not include automatic shut-off (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Schneider SCFP57

  • High power capacity with a 1500-watt motor capable of handling heavy or dense mixtures
  • Excellent stability during operation due to its die-cast metal body and base combined with suction cup feet
  • Large 5.7-liter stainless steel bowl ideal for big batches
  • Attractive and trendy vintage neo-retro aesthetic
  • Versatile speed control with 10 distinct options
  • Includes essential stainless steel baking attachments such as a wire whisk, dough hook, and mixing shovel

What customers don't like about Schneider SCFP57

  • Instruction manual lack of English language availability can make initial usage non-intuitive for non-French speakers
  • Limited continuous run time as it cannot exceed 10 minutes without risking motor overheating due to thermal safety limits
  • Only the bowl and the splatter guard are safe for dishwasher use, while other components require manual cleaning

Verdict

The Schneider SCFP57 is a 1950s neo-retro style tilt-head stand mixer featuring a powerful 1500-watt motor, a 5.7-liter stainless steel bowl, and 10 speed settings utilizing a thorough planetary mixing movement. Its main advantages include a highly robust die-cast metal body and base, enhanced stability provided by non-slip suction feet, dishwasher-safe bowl components, and a comprehensive stainless steel pastry kit containing a wire whisk, dough hook, mixer blade, and transparent splash guard. However, a notable disadvantage is its heavy weight of approximately 10.7 kg (24.2 lbs), which can make moving it difficult, alongside a continuous maximum operation limit of 10 minutes per cycle to avoid overheating.

Compare Schneider SCFP57 with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Schneider SCFP57 and other stand mixers

No results found