OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

Morphy Richards MixStar 400520 review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£110Motor power:650 WBowl capacity:4 LNumber of speed levels:6Number of included attachments:3Weight:4.7 kg

Morphy Richards MixStar 400520 Review: Compare 41 technical specifications and 3 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

Morphy Richards MixStar 400520
6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 94% of models
Score components

60%

5.3

Technical score

15%

5.3

User score

15%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

8.5

Reviews score

▼Worse than 94% of stand mixers
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

▼Worse than 71%
5.3

Technical score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

35%

4.9

Performance

15%

5.8

Functions

15%

5.9

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

7.9

Design

10%

6.2

Safety

▼Worse than 92%
8.5

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 65% of models

80%

8.5

Average grade

20%

8.3

Popularity

Grades by review (3)
3 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
▲Better than 65%
5.3

User score

User score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 98% of models

5.3

Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.8

Rating

30%

5.0

Popularity

▼Worse than 98%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • morphy-richards-mixstar-400520
  • morphy-richards-mixstar-400520
  • morphy-richards-mixstar-400520
  • morphy-richards-mixstar-400520
  • morphy-richards-mixstar-400520
  • morphy-richards-mixstar-400520
  • morphy-richards-mixstar-400520
morphy-richards-mixstar-400520
morphy-richards-mixstar-400520
morphy-richards-mixstar-400520
morphy-richards-mixstar-400520
morphy-richards-mixstar-400520
morphy-richards-mixstar-400520
morphy-richards-mixstar-400520
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Morphy Richards MixStar 400520

Based on 3

Reviewers agree the attachment storage is handy and well thought out, with no shared complaints raised.
Praised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer Morphy Richards MixStar 400520

Technical score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components:

35%

4.9

Performance

15%

5.8

Functions

15%

5.9

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

7.9

Design

10%

6.2

Safety

5.3
Reviews score
8.5
User score
5.3
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

7.1
Mixer type
counter-rotating
Head design
?
Motor power
650 W
Market range: <350 W – >1.5k W
This stand mixer delivers 650 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated power of 78.1% of stand mixers and equal to that of 0.9% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
6
Market range: <6 – >11
This stand mixer offers 6 speed levels, which is fewer speed settings than on 59.7% of stand mixers and equal to that on 31.6% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
?
Show more
Bowl capacity
4 L
Market range: <4 L – >7.6 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 4 L, which is smaller than the mixing bowl of 84.4% of stand mixers and equal to that of 6.3% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
?
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
?
Display
yes
This stand mixer has a display. 73.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
dial
Show more
Number of included attachments
3
Market range: <3 – >6
This stand mixer comes with 3 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 2.8% of stand mixers and equal to that with 65.1% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
Height
28 cm
Market range: <28.2 cm – >41.9 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 28 cm, which is lower than the height of 94.6% of stand mixers.
Width
31 cm
Market range: <21 cm – >40.2 cm
This stand mixer measures 31 cm in width, which is wider than 63% of stand mixers and equal in width to 0.9% of stand mixers.
Depth
28.5 cm
Market range: <22 cm – >42 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 28.5 cm, which is shallower than 57.1% of stand mixers and equal in depth to 1.4% of stand mixers.
Weight
4.7 kg
Market range: <3.98 kg – >13.2 kg
This stand mixer weighs 4.7 kg, which is lighter than 79.9% of stand mixers and equal in weight to 0.9% of stand mixers.
Body material
plastic
Show more
Overload protection
yes
This stand mixer has overload protection, unlike 99.3%.
Safety locking system
yes
This stand mixer has safety locking system, unlike 97.5%.
Automatic shut-off
no
This stand mixer does not have automatic shut-off, unlike 42.2%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

Morphy Richards MixStar 400520 vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • Has a display
    This stand mixer has a display, while the average stand mixer does not. 27.1% of stand mixers have a display.
  • 7 cm lower height
    This stand mixer fits more comfortably beneath low kitchen wall cabinets and shelves than the average stand mixer (28 cm vs 35 cm).
    28 cm vs 35 cm
  • 37.3% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (4.7 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    4.7 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 13.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 65% of models

    80%

    8.5

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (3)
    3 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    8.5 vs 7.5
  • 2.83 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (28.5 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    28.5 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 90.9% cheaper
    Morphy Richards MixStar 400520 is cheaper than the average stand mixer (£110 vs £210).
    £110 vs £210
  • 13.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 65% of models

    80%

    8.5

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (3)
    3 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    8.5 vs 7.5
  • 90.9% cheaper
    Morphy Richards MixStar 400520 is cheaper than the average stand mixer (£110 vs £210).
    £110 vs £210
  • Has a display
    This stand mixer has a display, while the average stand mixer does not. 27.1% of stand mixers have a display.
  • 7 cm lower height
    This stand mixer fits more comfortably beneath low kitchen wall cabinets and shelves than the average stand mixer (28 cm vs 35 cm).
    28 cm vs 35 cm
  • 37.3% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (4.7 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    4.7 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 2.83 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (28.5 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    28.5 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • Does not have automatic shut-off
    This stand mixer does not include automatic shut-off (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 350 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (650 W vs 1,000 W).
    650 W vs 1,000 W
  • Does not have planetary mixing action
    This stand mixer does not include planetary mixing action (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 31.2% lower user score
    User score
    5.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 98% of models

    5.3

    Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.8

    Rating

    30%

    5.0

    Popularity

    5.3 vs 7.7
  • 1 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4 L vs 5 L).
    4 L vs 5 L
  • 1 fewer speed levels
    This stand mixer has fewer speed steps and larger jumps between speed settings than the average stand mixer (6 vs 7).
    6 vs 7
  • 0.14 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (1 m vs 1.09 m).
    0.95 m vs 1.09 m
  • 31.2% lower user score
    User score
    5.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 98% of models

    5.3

    Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.8

    Rating

    30%

    5.0

    Popularity

    5.3 vs 7.7
  • 4.6% worse value for money
    Morphy Richards MixStar 400520 has worse value for money than the average stand mixer (7.07 vs 7.4).
    7.07 vs 7.4
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 350 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (650 W vs 1,000 W).
    650 W vs 1,000 W
  • Does not have planetary mixing action
    This stand mixer does not include planetary mixing action (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 1 fewer speed levels
    This stand mixer has fewer speed steps and larger jumps between speed settings than the average stand mixer (6 vs 7).
    6 vs 7
  • 0.14 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (1 m vs 1.09 m).
    0.95 m vs 1.09 m
  • 3 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (31 cm vs 28 cm).
    31 cm vs 28 cm
  • 1 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4 L vs 5 L).
    4 L vs 5 L
  • Does not have automatic shut-off
    This stand mixer does not include automatic shut-off (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
bbcgoodfood.com
✓ explicit
23/03/2021
Test review · Compact space-saving mixer
Verdict
The Morphy Richards MixStar is a compact mixer with a storage caddy that fits inside its bowl, but it has no built-in scale and no extra attachments.
9.0
idealhome.co.uk
✓ explicit
18/02/2021
Hands-on test · Small kitchen mixer
Verdict
The Morphy Richards MixStar kneads bread dough well and stores its tools in the bowl, but it is noisy and can't run past 10 minutes at a time.
8.0
womanandhome.com
✓ explicit
24/03/2025
Hands-on test · Compact stand mixer
Verdict
The Morphy Richards MixStar is a compact, excellent-value mixer that handles bread and cake easily, but it is the loudest model tested.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Morphy Richards MixStar 400520

  • Compact and space-saving design that fits easily under standard kitchen cabinets
  • Open-top design allows for adding ingredients effortlessly without turning off the mixer
  • Integrated storage caddy stores all attachments neatly inside the mixing bowl
  • Generous 4-liter bowl capacity despite its small countertop footprint
  • Dual-rotational mechanism and built-in scrapers incorporate ingredients quickly
  • Dishwasher-safe bowl and accessories make cleanup easy
  • In-built count-up timer helps follow precise recipe timings

What customers don't like about Morphy Richards MixStar 400520

  • Struggles to efficiently incorporate or reach very small quantities of ingredients due to the wide, flat bowl design
  • Lacks a dedicated pouring spout or lip for a secure grip on the bowl
  • The central stem configuration can make adding or removing attachments slightly awkward
  • Some plastic parts, such as the beaters, feel less premium than high-end metallic mixers
  • No integrated power cord storage solution
  • Lacks a built-in weighing scale or the ability to support external power attachments
  • Can be quite loud when operating on its highest speed settings

Verdict

The Morphy Richards MixStar 400520 is an innovative, compact stand mixer featuring an open-top design driven by a bottom-up 650W motor, which eliminates the traditional bulky overhead mixing arm. Key technical specifications include a 4-liter stainless steel bowl, 6 variable speed settings, an integrated digital count-up timer, and dimensions of 28 x 31 x 28.5 cm with a weight of 4.7 kg. Main pros highlight its unique dual-rotational, counter-rotating attachments (including twin beaters, whisks, and dough hooks) paired with a dual scraper to optimize ingredient incorporation, a convenient internal storage caddy that packs entirely inside the bowl, a transparent splash guard with an inlet chute, and dishwasher-safe components. On the downside, the mixer can be quite noisy during operation, occasionally struggles to fully incorporate small quantities of ingredients due to the wide flat base of the bowl, lacks integrated scales or a cord storage mechanism, and features plastic internal gearing that some users found less durable.

Compare Morphy Richards MixStar 400520 with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Morphy Richards MixStar 400520 and other stand mixers

No results found