OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

Lacor 69388 review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£90Motor power:600 WBowl capacity:4 LNumber of speed levels:6Number of included attachments:3Weight:4.4 kg

Lacor 69388 Review: Compare 41 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

Lacor 69388
6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Score components

60%

5.4

Technical score

15%

5.4

User score

15%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.7, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 94% of stand mixers
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

â–¼Worse than 71%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

35%

6.6

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

4.4

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

7.7

Design

10%

6.2

Safety

â–¼Worse than 90%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.7.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
No expert tests yet
5.4

User score

User score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models

5.4

Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.6

Rating

30%

5.0

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 96%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • lacor-69388
  • lacor-69388
  • lacor-69388
  • lacor-69388
  • lacor-69388
  • lacor-69388
lacor-69388
lacor-69388
lacor-69388
lacor-69388
lacor-69388
lacor-69388
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer Lacor 69388

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components:

35%

6.6

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

4.4

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

7.7

Design

10%

6.2

Safety

5.4
Reviews score
7.7
User score
5.4
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

7.1
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
?
Motor power
600 W
Market range: <350 W – >1.5k W
This stand mixer delivers 600 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated power of 79.5% of stand mixers and equal to that of 1.8% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
6
Market range: <6 – >11
This stand mixer offers 6 speed levels, which is fewer speed settings than on 59.7% of stand mixers and equal to that on 31.6% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
180 RPM
Market range: <180 RPM – >422 RPM
This stand mixer reaches a top planetary speed of 180 RPM, which is slower than the maximum speed of 90% of stand mixers.
Show more
Bowl capacity
4 L
Market range: <4 L – >7.6 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 4 L, which is smaller than the mixing bowl of 84.4% of stand mixers and equal to that of 6.3% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
1.2 kg
Market range: <1.3 kg – >5 kg
This stand mixer has a dough capacity of 1.2 kg, which is smaller than 92.5% of stand mixers.
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
?
Display
no
This stand mixer does not have a display. 27.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
dial
Show more
Number of included attachments
3
Market range: <3 – >6
This stand mixer comes with 3 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 2.8% of stand mixers and equal to that with 65.1% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
Height
30 cm
Market range: <28.2 cm – >41.9 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 30 cm, which is lower than the height of 81.4% of stand mixers and equal to that of 2.7% of stand mixers.
Width
35 cm
Market range: <21 cm – >40.2 cm
This stand mixer measures 35 cm in width, which is wider than 69.4% of stand mixers and equal in width to 2.7% of stand mixers.
Depth
35 cm
Market range: <22 cm – >42 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 35 cm, which is deeper than 59% of stand mixers and equal in depth to 3.2% of stand mixers.
Weight
4.4 kg
Market range: <3.98 kg – >13.2 kg
This stand mixer weighs 4.4 kg, which is lighter than 86% of stand mixers and equal in weight to 0.9% of stand mixers.
Body material
plastic
Show more
Overload protection
?
Safety locking system
yes
This stand mixer has safety locking system, unlike 97.5%.
Automatic shut-off
no
This stand mixer does not have automatic shut-off, unlike 42.2%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

Lacor 69388 vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 31 dB quieter operation
    This stand mixer runs with noticeably less motor whine, creating a more pleasant kitchen environment than the average stand mixer (44 dB vs 75 dB).
    44 dB vs 75 dB
  • 41.3% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (4.4 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    4.4 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 5 cm lower height
    This stand mixer fits more comfortably beneath low kitchen wall cabinets and shelves than the average stand mixer (30 cm vs 35 cm).
    30 cm vs 35 cm
  • 2.33x cheaper
    Lacor 69388 is cheaper than the average stand mixer (£90 vs £210).
    £90 vs £210
  • 2.33x cheaper
    Lacor 69388 is cheaper than the average stand mixer (£90 vs £210).
    £90 vs £210
  • 31 dB quieter operation
    This stand mixer runs with noticeably less motor whine, creating a more pleasant kitchen environment than the average stand mixer (44 dB vs 75 dB).
    44 dB vs 75 dB
  • 41.3% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (4.4 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    4.4 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 5 cm lower height
    This stand mixer fits more comfortably beneath low kitchen wall cabinets and shelves than the average stand mixer (30 cm vs 35 cm).
    30 cm vs 35 cm
  • Does not have automatic shut-off
    This stand mixer does not include automatic shut-off (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 400 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (600 W vs 1,000 W).
    600 W vs 1,000 W
  • 50% smaller dough capacity
    This stand mixer has a smaller dough capacity than the average stand mixer (1.2 kg vs 2.4 kg). The average stand mixer has a dough capacity of 2.4 kg.
    1.2 kg vs 2.4 kg
  • 1 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4 L vs 5 L).
    4 L vs 5 L
  • 29.9% lower user score
    User score
    5.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models

    5.4

    Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    5.0

    Popularity

    5.4 vs 7.7
  • 1 fewer speed levels
    This stand mixer has fewer speed steps and larger jumps between speed settings than the average stand mixer (6 vs 7).
    6 vs 7
  • 7 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (35 cm vs 28 cm).
    35 cm vs 28 cm
  • 3.68 cm deeper body
    This stand mixer extends further front-to-back and requires a deeper countertop area than the average stand mixer (35 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    35 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 29.9% lower user score
    User score
    5.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models

    5.4

    Mark 7.5 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    5.0

    Popularity

    5.4 vs 7.7
  • 3.9% worse value for money
    Lacor 69388 has worse value for money than the average stand mixer (7.12 vs 7.4).
    7.12 vs 7.4
  • 400 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (600 W vs 1,000 W).
    600 W vs 1,000 W
  • 1 fewer speed levels
    This stand mixer has fewer speed steps and larger jumps between speed settings than the average stand mixer (6 vs 7).
    6 vs 7
  • 40 RPM lower speed
    This stand mixer has a lower top RPM and takes slightly longer to aerate light meringues and creams than the average stand mixer (180 RPM vs 220 RPM).
    180 RPM vs 220 RPM
  • 7 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (35 cm vs 28 cm).
    35 cm vs 28 cm
  • 3.68 cm deeper body
    This stand mixer extends further front-to-back and requires a deeper countertop area than the average stand mixer (35 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    35 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 50% smaller dough capacity
    This stand mixer has a smaller dough capacity than the average stand mixer (1.2 kg vs 2.4 kg). The average stand mixer has a dough capacity of 2.4 kg.
    1.2 kg vs 2.4 kg
  • 1 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4 L vs 5 L).
    4 L vs 5 L
  • Does not have automatic shut-off
    This stand mixer does not include automatic shut-off (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Lacor 69388

  • Efficient planetary mixing system with a double rotational and orbital spin action
  • Comes with six adjustable speed settings plus a helpful pulse/turbo function
  • Equipped with non-slip suction feet on the base for excellent stability during operation
  • Features a transparent splash guard lid with a built-in window to easily add ingredients
  • Includes standard functional attachments for beating, kneading, and mixing tasks
  • Provides a reasonable 1.2 kg kneading capacity suitable for light domestic pastry work

What customers don't like about Lacor 69388

  • Limited 4-litre bowl capacity may feel restrictive compared to larger standard mixers
  • The 600W motor is mostly suited for light baking and may struggle under heavy, sustained loads
  • Geared purely toward entry-level home baking rather than intensive, professional kitchen use

Verdict

The Lacor 69388 Gourmet Stand Mixer is a compact kitchen appliance equipped with a 600W motor, a 4.0-liter stainless steel bowl, and a 1.2 kg dough kneading capacity. It features a physical speed controller offering 6 speed levels plus a pulse (turbo) function, functioning with a double-turn, planetary rotation system (rotary and orbital movement) to ensure thorough blending. Key advantages include a 35-degree tilting head for effortless accessory attachment changeouts, an anti-splash transparent lid with a built-in ingredient window, three primary attachments for beating, kneading, and mixing, and non-slip suction cup feet that ensure overall stability during high-intensity usage. On the downside, its 4.0-liter bowl capacity and 1.2 kg kneading limit make it less suitable for extra-large baking batches, and the physical plastic housing design may feel less premium compared to heavier, fully cast-metal alternative models.

Compare Lacor 69388 with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Lacor 69388 and other stand mixers

No results found