OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,948 independent expert reviews and 12,633 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Motorola Moto Watch 100 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90Screen size:1.30 inchBattery life:14 daysDisplay type:IPS LCD

Motorola Moto Watch 100 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 13 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Motorola Moto Watch 100
6.6/10

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components

70%

6.5

Technical score

30%

6.7

Reviews score ( 1 · 12)

Reviews score 30% · 6.7 · based on 13 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
â–¼Worse than 51% of smartwatches
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–²Better than 53%
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components

24%

5.6

Health

21%

9.3

Fitness

16%

5.8

Battery

14%

5.8

Smart features

12%

4.7

Connectivity

9%

7.2

Display & Design

4%

5.4

Hardware

â–²Better than 56%
6.7

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Grades by review (13)
1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 93%
  • motorola-moto-watch-100
  • motorola-moto-watch-100
  • motorola-moto-watch-100
  • motorola-moto-watch-100
  • motorola-moto-watch-100
  • motorola-moto-watch-100
  • motorola-moto-watch-100
motorola-moto-watch-100
motorola-moto-watch-100
motorola-moto-watch-100
motorola-moto-watch-100
motorola-moto-watch-100
motorola-moto-watch-100
motorola-moto-watch-100
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Smartwatches model ranking

Ranked #277 of 701 models in Smartwatches (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Motorola Moto Watch 100

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components:

24%

5.6

Health

21%

9.3

Fitness

16%

5.8

Battery

14%

5.8

Smart features

12%

4.7

Connectivity

9%

7.2

Display & Design

4%

5.4

Hardware

6.5
Reviews score
6.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components:

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.6
Brand name
Motorola
Heart rate monitor
yes
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
14 days
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 14 days which is longer than that of 76.9% of smartwatches and equal to that of 9.2% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
12 h
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 12 h in training mode which is shorter than 62.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.2% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
4 h
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 4 h with GPS on which is shorter than 94.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 3.4% of smartwatches.
Battery power
355 mAh
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 355 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 67.8% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.3% of smartwatches.
Charge time
60 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 60 min which is faster than 82.6% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 12.1% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Moto Watch OS
This smartwatch runs Moto Watch OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 51.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 0.6% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 67.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.3 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.3 inch which is smaller than the screens of 66.8% of smartwatches and equal to those of 11.2% of smartwatches.
Some sources mention multiple/uncertain size variants.
Display type
IPS LCD
This smartwatch uses a IPS LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 67.4% of smartwatches and the same as that of 6.6% of smartwatches.
Resolution
360x 360
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 360x360 which is higher than that of 50.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.7% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
392 ppi
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 392 ppi which is higher than that of 66.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.7% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
400 nits
Market range: <450 nits – >2k nits
This smartwatch reaches 400 nits of display brightness, which is lower than that of 93.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.7% of smartwatches.
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Motorola Moto Watch 100 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 60 min shorter charge time
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (60 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    60 min vs 120 min
  • 7 days day/s longer battery life
    This smartwatch offers 14 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    14 days vs 7 days
  • Fall detection
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Cadence tracking
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • Barometer sensor included
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • Calorie tracking
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
  • Barometer sensor included
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Cadence tracking
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
  • 60 min shorter charge time
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (60 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    60 min vs 120 min
  • 7 days day/s longer battery life
    This smartwatch offers 14 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    14 days vs 7 days
  • 55 mAh larger battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (355 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    355 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Rugged construction
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • 16 g lighter weight
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (29 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    Weight includes strap/bracelet.
    29.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass vs mineral glass
  • 2 mm narrower band
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 66 ppi higher pixel density
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (392 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    392 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Fall detection
    This smartwatch supports fall detection, the average smartwatch does not. 21.3% of smartwatches support fall detection.
  • Emergency SOS
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Moto Watch OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Moto Watch OS vs Proprietary OS
  • 16 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (4 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    4 h vs 20 h
  • Basic display type
    This smartwatch uses IPS LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    IPS LCD vs AMOLED
  • No voice assistant
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • No voice command support
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • 20 m lower water resistance depth
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (30 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    3 ATM class (ISO 22,810 shallow-water rating, not diving certification).
    30 m vs 50 m
  • No smart scale support
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No smart scale support
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • 54 fewer exercise profiles
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (26 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    26 vs 80
  • No voice feedback
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 61.9% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 16 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less with GPS on than the average smartwatch (4 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    4 h vs 20 h
  • Basic battery type
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 7.25 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less in training mode than the average smartwatch (12 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    12 h vs 19.25 h
  • Basic display type
    This smartwatch uses IPS LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    IPS LCD vs AMOLED
  • 20 m lower water resistance depth
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (30 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    3 ATM class (ISO 22,810 shallow-water rating, not diving certification).
    30 m vs 50 m
  • 200 nits lower display brightness
    This smartwatch has lower display brightness than the average smartwatch (400 nits vs 600 nits). The average smartwatch reaches 600 nits.
    400 nits vs 600 nits
  • 0.1 inch smaller screen size
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1.3 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    Some sources mention multiple/uncertain size variants.
    1.30 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • No voice assistant
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No call controls
    This smartwatch does not offer call control, the average smartwatch does. 90.9% of smartwatches offer call control.
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No widget support
    This smartwatch does not support widgets, the average smartwatch does. 83.1% of smartwatches support widgets.
  • No camera remote
    This smartwatch does not include built-in camera remote control, the average smartwatch does. 85.6% of smartwatches that are equipped with a camera include built-in camera remote control.
  • No gesture control
    This smartwatch does not support gesture control, the average smartwatch does. 77.7% of smartwatches support gesture control.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch includes 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
Peter Herget & Gadgets Anonymous
≈ estimated
30/01/2023
Day five review · daily use and accuracy checks
Verdict
Motorola Moto Watch 100 is a pretty good budget smartwatch if you need one, though it has clear limitations.
5.0
TechMishka
≈ estimated
16/04/2022
Hands-on review · design, lag, app and feature tests
Verdict
Motorola Moto Watch 100 has an attractive display and build, but laggy software and missing features make it hard to recommend.
7.0
ZDNET
≈ estimated
24/01/2022
Hands-on review · two weeks of use and firmware updates
Verdict
Motorola Moto Watch 100 is limited and laggy, but a fair first fitness tracker for the price.
6.0
Justin Pennito
≈ estimated
06/01/2022
Overview · hands-on use and price check
Verdict
Motorola Moto Watch 100 looks and feels decent, but it is overpriced for the features it offers.
9.0
Yancymane
≈ estimated
01/01/2022
Unboxing and review · setup and health tests
Verdict
Motorola Moto Watch 100 is good value for the price, with solid health tracking and a light, comfortable build.
7.0
Keiah2technical
≈ estimated
31/12/2021
Pros and cons · first week of use
Verdict
Motorola Moto Watch 100 suits active users, but limited watch faces and no tap-to-wake hold it back.
5.0
The Man With Two Watches
≈ estimated
02/02/2023
First use · pairing setup and firmware update
Verdict
Motorola Moto Watch 100 was frustrating to set up, with repeated pairing failures and a battery that ran too low.
6.0
Revu2u
✓ explicit
13/12/2022
Review · budget smartwatch with app and battery tests
Verdict
Motorola Moto Watch 100 offers plenty of features for the money, but laggy software and weak battery life hold it back.
5.0
FishBee Productions
≈ estimated
16/12/2021
First impressions · unboxing and early app use
Verdict
Motorola Moto Watch 100 isn't worth recommending yet; software updates could still smooth out the rough edges.
Overview video
Overview video
Overview video

What reviewers agree on

Based on 2 · 12

Reviewers like the health tracking, battery life and value, but find it sluggish, with few watch faces and no calls or payments.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
acciyo.com
≈ estimated
20/10/2025
Review · Fitness-first watch
Verdict
The Motorola Moto Watch 100 is a solid aluminium fitness tracker with GPS and multi-day battery life, but its laggy software, locked-in data and no reply function let it down.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Motorola Moto Watch 100

  • Excellent battery life, frequently lasting 10 to 14 days on a single charge.
  • Premium and lightweight design with a durable aluminum case.
  • Affordable price point, often cited as a strong value for a basic fitness wearable.
  • Accurate health tracking insights, particularly sleep and recovery metrics powered by Polar.
  • Comfortable for 24/7 wear due to its slim profile and soft silicone strap.
  • Fast charging capability, reaching a full charge in approximately 60 minutes.

What we don't like about Motorola Moto Watch 100

  • Lacks Wear OS, meaning there is no support for third-party apps or Google Assistant.
  • Unreliable and slow GPS connectivity that frequently loses signal during outdoor activities.
  • Limited notification interaction; users can view alerts but cannot reply to messages or take calls.
  • Buggy and basic companion app with limited data visualization and sync issues.
  • Underwhelming speaker and microphone quality, making it difficult to hear alerts in noisy environments.
  • Fragile display glass that is reported to be prone to scratches during regular use.
  • Poor long-term reliability, with some users reporting hardware failures within a few months.

Verdict

The Motorola Moto Watch 100 is a lightweight, budget-friendly smartwatch featuring a 42mm aluminum case and a 1.3-inch circular LCD touchscreen with a 360 x 360 resolution. Running on the proprietary Moto Watch OS rather than Wear OS, it prioritize efficiency, delivering an impressive 14-day battery life on a single 60-minute charge. Its core features include 26 sport modes, built-in GPS/GLONASS/BeiDou, 5 ATM water resistance, and comprehensive health monitoring via heart rate, SpO2, and sleep sensors. Key advantages are its sleek 29g design, long-lasting battery, and compatibility with both Android and iOS; however, notable drawbacks include a lack of third-party app support, limited watch face customization, and occasional interface lag during navigation.

Compare Motorola Moto Watch 100 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Motorola Moto Watch 100 and other Smartwatches

No results found