OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Garmin Vivoactive review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£220Screen size:1.38 inchBattery life:9 daysDisplay type:MIP LCD

Garmin Vivoactive Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 23 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Garmin Vivoactive
7.3/10

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components

35%

6.0

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.1

Reviews score

10%

9.1

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 60% of smartwatches
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

â–²Better than 56%
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

24%

4.6

Health

21%

8.6

Fitness

16%

5.1

Battery

14%

6.1

Smart features

12%

5.1

Connectivity

9%

7.7

Display & Design

4%

3.1

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 58%
8.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models

80%

8.0

Average grade

20%

8.2

Popularity

Grades by review (23)
16 reviews + 7 videos, average 8.0/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 59%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • garmin-vivoactive
garmin-vivoactive
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Garmin Vivoactive

Based on 10 · 6

Reviewers find it comfortable and good for swimming and sports, but opinions split on the heart rate sensor and display.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Garmin Vivoactive

Based on 40 owners sharing their experience in online comments

58%positive12%mixed30%negative

Owners mostly praise its versatile workout tracking, while screen readability and battery life are the clearest frustrations.

What owners dislike

  • Owners say the grey screen looks dim and hard to read, and some find the pixelated display dated, especially in bright light or with glasses.4
  • Owners say breadcrumb route navigation and Komoot route sync now need a paid Premium subscription, and free routes no longer work.4
  • Owners say the battery drops to four or five days or less than one day, falling well short of the older Vivoactive 4 battery life.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Garmin Vivoactive

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components:

24%

4.6

Health

21%

8.6

Fitness

16%

5.1

Battery

14%

6.1

Smart features

12%

5.1

Connectivity

9%

7.7

Display & Design

4%

3.1

Hardware

6.0
Reviews score
8.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components:

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

7.9
Heart rate monitor
no
This smartwatch does not include a heart rate monitor. 90.7% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 69.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 49.5% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
HRV tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports HRV tracking. 54.9% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 28.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 67.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
9 days
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 9 days on a charge, which is longer than 56.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.5% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
15 h
Market range: <6 h – >48 h
This smartwatch records workouts for 15 h on a charge, which is shorter than 58% of Smartwatches and the same as 2.5% of Smartwatches.
Up to 13 hours in gps/training mode.
Battery life with GPS on
13 h
Market range: <6 h – >46 h
This smartwatch lasts 13 h with GPS on, which is shorter than 71% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.5% of Smartwatches.
Battery power
150 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 150 mAh battery, which is smaller than 95.8% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.5% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Garmin OS
This smartwatch runs Garmin OS, which is more advanced than the system in 70.7% of Smartwatches and equal to 9.2% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
occasional
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 54% of smartwatches and equal to that of 40.2% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 69.3% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
This smartwatch supports GPS. 40.3% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 56.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.38 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.38 inch screen, which is smaller than 60.4% of Smartwatches and the same as 0.7% of Smartwatches.
Some sources mention multiple/uncertain size variants.
Display type
MIP LCD
This smartwatch uses MIP LCD, which is less advanced than the screen in 62.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 5.7% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
148x 205
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 148x205 which is lower than that of 94.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.1% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
?
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Garmin Vivoactive vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Crash detection capability
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 14% of smartwatches support crash detection.
    Requires paired phone/network and/or specific activities for automatic alerts.
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS
  • More frequent updates
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    occasional vs ended
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Cadence tracking
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
    Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
  • Supports ANT+
    This smartwatch supports ANT+, the average smartwatch does not. 13% of smartwatches support ANT+.
  • Galileo satellite support
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • 15.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 59% of models

    80%

    8.0

    Average grade

    20%

    8.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (23)
    16 reviews + 7 videos, average 8.0/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.1 vs 7.0
  • 21.3% higher sentiment score
    9.1 vs 7.5
  • HRV tracking
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Weight tracking
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 41.9% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Weight tracking may rely on manual app entry or smart-scale sync.
  • Water intake tracking
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44.1% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 46.6% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Cadence tracking
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
    Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
  • 2 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (9 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    9 days vs 7 days
  • Supports ANT+
    This smartwatch supports ANT+, the average smartwatch does not. 13% of smartwatches support ANT+.
  • Galileo satellite support
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • 3.7 mm slimmer
    This smartwatch is slimmer than the average smartwatch (8 mm vs 11.7 mm). The average smartwatch is 11.7 mm thick.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    8 mm vs 11.7 mm
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses aluminum, stainless steel, fiber-reinforced polymer for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    aluminum, stainless steel, fiber-reinforced polymer vs polycarbonate
  • Stronger display glass
    This smartwatch uses chemically strengthened glass display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    chemically strengthened glass vs mineral glass
  • 2 mm slimmer strap
    This smartwatch has a slimmer strap than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch has a 22 mm strap.
    Uses proprietary/non-standard band connector.
    20 mm vs 22 mm
  • 7 g lighter
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (38 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    38 g vs 45 g
  • Crash detection capability
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 14% of smartwatches support crash detection.
    Requires paired phone/network and/or specific activities for automatic alerts.
  • More advanced operating system
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS
  • More frequent updates
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    occasional vs ended
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No multi-sport mode
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 71.7% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No heart rate monitor
    This smartwatch does not include a heart rate monitor, the average smartwatch does. 90.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • No voice assistant
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 69.2% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No compass
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • 2x more expensive
    Garmin Vivoactive is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£220 vs £110).
    £220 vs £110
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No heart rate monitor
    This smartwatch does not include a heart rate monitor, the average smartwatch does. 90.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
  • 6 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2015 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    April 2015
    2015 vs 2021
  • No multi-sport mode
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 71.7% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 86 fewer exercise types
    This smartwatch includes fewer exercise types than the average smartwatch (4 vs 90). The average smartwatch includes 90 exercise types.
    4 vs 90
  • No voice feedback
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 8 h shorter GPS battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time with GPS on than the average smartwatch (13 h vs 21 h). The average smartwatch lasts 21 h with GPS on.
    13 h vs 21 h
  • 155 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery than the average smartwatch (150 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    150 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • 5 h shorter training battery life
    This smartwatch lasts less time in training mode than the average smartwatch (15 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h in training mode.
    Up to 13 hours in gps/training mode.
    15 h vs 20 h
  • No compass
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • More basic display
    This smartwatch uses a more basic screen than the average smartwatch (MIP LCD vs AMOLED).
    MIP LCD vs AMOLED
  • Lower resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 148x205, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    148x205 vs 360x360
  • 0.02 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.4 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    Some sources mention multiple/uncertain size variants.
    1.38 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice assistant
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 69.2% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 60% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 68.1% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No smart alarm
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No speaker
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch has 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Techy Agent
≈ estimated
28/03/2015
Hands-on review · fitness tracking, smart features and app
Verdict
Garmin Vivoactive has its flaws, but it is about as close to an ideal fitness smartwatch as you can get right now.
9.0
Gear Diary
≈ estimated
16/04/2015
Hands-on review · first five days of use
Verdict
Garmin Vivoactive is a thin, light smartwatch with strong features and long GPS battery life, making it a good fit for runs.
8.0
Techy Agent
≈ estimated
26/03/2015
First impressions · unboxing and setup
Verdict
Garmin Vivoactive looks great and feels solid, but setup is fiddly and the chest strap is a drawback.
Hands-on video, no verdict

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
dcrainmaker.com
≈ estimated
07/04/2015
In-depth review · Early fitness watch
Verdict
The Garmin Vivoactive is a capable fitness watch with phone alerts and music control, but dropped phone links and GPS turning on by itself make daily use annoying.
5.9
cnet.com
✓ explicit
20/04/2015
Hands-on test · Fitness smartwatch
Verdict
The Garmin Vivoactive has a slim, comfortable design and fast GPS, but freezing, random phone disconnects and basic sleep tracking hold it back for now.
9.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
01/04/2015
Hands-on test · Activity tracker watch
Verdict
The Garmin Vivoactive is a slim watch with GPS and swim tracking whose battery lasts up to three weeks, though its app store is still young.
8.0
bikeradar.com
✓ explicit
17/12/2015
Long-term test · Cycling features
Verdict
The Garmin Vivoactive works as a wrist cycling computer without a phone, but it lasts about 10 hours on GPS and its screen looks dull in low light.
6.0
fellrnr.com
≈ estimated
18/06/2017
Running comparison · Feature tables
Verdict
The Garmin Vivoactive is a simple running watch that gains a lot from a Stryd footpod, though its overall verdict in this comparison is mixed.
8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
27/05/2015
Wear test · Fitness and comfort
Verdict
The Garmin Vivoactive is a comfortable, long-lasting fitness watch for keen exercisers, though it looks plain and works more like a training tool than a smartwatch.
7.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
15/09/2015
Hands-on review · Cycling and screen
Verdict
The Garmin Vivoactive is an attractive pick for swimmers, runners and golfers, but its slow touchscreen and missing heart-rate monitor let it down.
9.0
laptopmedia.com
≈ estimated
13/07/2015
Full review · Design and features
Verdict
The Garmin Vivoactive is a slim, always-on sports watch that suits people who want phone-free tracking, though its display is less detailed than Android Wear watches.
6.0
newatlas.com
≈ estimated
21/07/2015
Few-week test · Fitness tracking
Verdict
The Garmin Vivoactive is a slim, light watch for phone-free runners and cyclists, though its missing heart-rate sensor makes training intensity harder to judge.
9.0
montre-cardio-gps.fr
≈ estimated
26/10/2015
Hands-on test · Running and swimming
Verdict
The Garmin Vivoactive is a tiny, light GPS watch that suits small wrists and runners, but its GPS often underestimates distance, especially on winding city routes.
8.0
commeuncamion.com
≈ estimated
11/12/2015
Hands-on test · Running and notifications
Verdict
The Garmin Vivoactive is a discreet, very light watch that is easy to forget on the wrist, though its interface is basic and its music controls are limited.
9.0
correrunamaraton.com
✓ explicit
20/05/2015
Battery test · Smartwatch features
Verdict
The Garmin Vivoactive lasted 9.5 hours on GPS in this test and suits outdoor training, but thick gloves stop the touchscreen working.
7.0
labolsadelcorredor.com
≈ estimated
26/09/2015
Detailed review · Swimming and golf
Verdict
The Garmin Vivoactive is a good pool swimming watch that counts strokes and lengths automatically, but it cannot load structured interval workouts.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Garmin Vivoactive

  • Vibrant and responsive AMOLED touchscreen display
  • Long-lasting battery life, often reaching up to 11-12 days in smartwatch mode
  • Slim, lightweight, and comfortable design suitable for 24/7 wear
  • Accurate GPS and comprehensive heart rate tracking for everyday fitness
  • Advanced health monitoring features including Body Battery, sleep coaching, and nap detection
  • Support for offline music storage and syncing with services like Spotify
  • Quick and easy initial setup and syncing via the Garmin Connect app

What customers don't like about Garmin Vivoactive

  • Lacks premium hardware found in higher-end models, such as a barometric altimeter or ECG sensor
  • Limited availability of high-quality third-party apps in the Connect IQ store
  • Touchscreen-heavy navigation can be fiddly compared to models with more physical buttons
  • Real-time GPS pace can sometimes be overly optimistic during active workouts
  • Some users find the included silicone straps feel cheap or cause skin irritation
  • No support for specialized modes like open-water swimming
  • Occasional Bluetooth connectivity issues or delays in receiving phone notifications

Verdict

The Garmin Vivoactive 5 is a lightweight GPS smartwatch featuring a 1.2-inch AMOLED touchscreen (390 x 390 resolution) and a fiber-reinforced polymer case with an aluminum bezel. It offers comprehensive health tracking including a Gen 4 heart rate sensor, Pulse Ox, sleep coaching with nap detection, and Body Battery energy monitoring, alongside over 30 built-in sports apps and 5 ATM water resistance. Main pros include its vibrant display, slim 11.1mm profile, and impressive battery life of up to 11 days in smartwatch mode. However, notable cons include the removal of the barometric altimeter (meaning no floor climbing data) and workout animations seen in previous models, as well as the lack of a microphone or speaker for taking calls directly on the wrist.

Compare Garmin Vivoactive with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Garmin Vivoactive and other Smartwatches

No results found