OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Projectors Methodology v3.0
Projectors Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Projectors Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Projectors Methodology v3.0

Aurzen Zip review: 86 specs compared

Avg. price:~£450Native panel resolution:1280x720ANSI lumens:100Throw ratio:1.09:1Lamp life:20000 hours

Aurzen Zip Review: Compare 86 technical specifications, 30 expert and video reviews and 5 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Projectors category and whether it is worth buying.

Aurzen Zip
6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

35%

5.4

Technical score

30%

8.5

List score

25%

5.4

Reviews score

10%

5.4

Sentiment score

▼Worse than 90% of projectors
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the projector's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a projector with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

8.1

Price

▼Worse than 54%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

42%

4.4

Image Quality

22%

6.9

Projection & Lens

12%

5.2

HDMI & Gaming

10%

6.0

Audio & Features

8%

5.0

Connectivity

6%

7.1

Design & Power

▼Worse than 92%
5.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.8 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 94% of models

5.4

Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.7

Average grade

20%

9.4

Popularity

Grades by review (30)
18 reviews: 11 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 94%
8.5

List score

List score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (5)
List score: in 5 of 102 lists (5%)
★Better than 95%
  • aurzen-zip
  • aurzen-zip
  • aurzen-zip
  • aurzen-zip
  • aurzen-zip
  • aurzen-zip
  • aurzen-zip
  • aurzen-zip
  • aurzen-zip
  • aurzen-zip
  • aurzen-zip
aurzen-zip
aurzen-zip
aurzen-zip
aurzen-zip
aurzen-zip
aurzen-zip
aurzen-zip
aurzen-zip
aurzen-zip
aurzen-zip
aurzen-zip
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Aurzen Zip

Based on 11 · 12

Reviewers love how tiny and easy to place it is, but say it's dim, noisy and weak on sound, apps and battery.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of projector Aurzen Zip

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components:

42%

4.4

Image Quality

22%

6.9

Projection & Lens

12%

5.2

HDMI & Gaming

10%

6.0

Audio & Features

8%

5.0

Connectivity

6%

7.1

Design & Power

5.4
Reviews score
5.4
List score
8.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the projector's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a projector with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

8.1

Price

6.9
ANSI lumens
100
Market range: <280 – >4k
This projector reaches 100 ANSI lumens, dimmer than 98.6% of projectors and equal to 0.8% of projectors.
Contrast ratio
300:1
This projector has a contrast ratio of 300:1, lower than 99.1% of projectors and equal to 0.9% of projectors.
Native contrast ratio.
Native panel resolution
1280x720
This projector uses a native resolution of 1280x720, lower than 82.1% of projectors and equal to 6.4% of projectors.
Output resolution
1280x720
This projector supports output resolution up to 1280x720, lower than 83.4% of projectors and equal to 5.8% of projectors.
Projection technology
DLP
Show more
What reviewers say
Throw ratio
1.09:1
Min throw distance
0.5 m
Market range: <0.5 m – >1.651 m
This projector needs a minimum throw distance of 0.5 m, shorter than 87.1% of projectors and equal to 3.2% of projectors.
Measured in meters.
Max projection size
?
Zoom ratio
N/A
Motorized zoom
no
This projector does not have motorised zoom. 14.8% of projectors offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Input lag
50 ms
Market range: <8 ms – >68 ms
This projector has input lag of 50 ms, higher than 78% of projectors and equal to 2.5% of projectors.
In Game Mode.
Auto low latency mode (ALLM)
no
This projector does not switch to low-latency mode automatically. 16.1% of projectors offer this.
Variable refresh rate (VRR)
no
This projector does not support variable refresh rate. 1.8% of projectors offer this.
HDMI version
N/A
Max HDMI bandwidth
N/A
Show more
N. of HDMI ports
0
Market range: <1 – >2
This projector has 0 HDMI port/s, fewer than 97.2% of projectors and equal to 2.8% of projectors.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This projector does not connect to Wi-Fi networks. 53.4% of projectors offer this.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This projector supports Bluetooth for speakers and headphones. 49.4% of projectors offer this.
Bluetooth version
5.4
This projector supports Bluetooth 5.4, more modern than 96.4% of projectors and equal to 3.6% of projectors.
Show more
What reviewers say
Smart TV features
no
This projector does not have built-in smart TV features. 43.9% of projectors offer this.
Operating system
none
Android OS
no
This projector does not run Android OS. 19.1% of projectors run Android OS.
Dedicated smartphone app
yes
This projector comes with a dedicated smartphone app. 63.3% of projectors come with a dedicated smartphone app.
AurzenHub app.
Remote control
no
This projector does not include a remote control. 98.6% of projectors offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Light source type
led
This projector uses led light source technology, more advanced than 33.6% of projectors and equal to 39.9% of projectors.
Laser light source
no
This projector does not have a laser light source. 26.8% of projectors offer this.
Lamp life
20,000 hours
Market range: <3.5k hours – >30k hours
This projector offers lamp life of 20,000 hours, shorter than 35.2% of projectors and equal to 25.8% of projectors.
Lamp life (eco mode)
20,000 hours
Market range: <5k hours – >30k hours
This projector offers eco-mode lamp life of 20,000 hours, shorter than 39.4% of projectors and equal to 17.9% of projectors.
Eco mode rating.
Operating power consumption
24 W
Market range: <57 W – >390 W
This projector uses 24 W of power, less than 97.2% of projectors and equal to 0.7% of projectors.
Show more
What reviewers say

Aurzen Zip vs the average projector

246810TotalImage QualityProjection & LensHDMI & GamingConnectivityAudio & FeaturesDesign & Power
  • Advanced focus control
    This projector offers more advanced focus control than the average projector (auto-focus vs manual). Typical projector: manual.
    Manual remote fine-tuning available.
    auto-focus vs manual
  • Supports pixel shifting
    This projector supports pixel shifting, while the average projector does not. 26.6% of projectors support pixel shifting.
    Via XPR technology.
  • Supports auto keystone correction
    This projector corrects keystone distortion automatically, while the average projector does not. 36.9% of projectors offer this.
  • 0.51 m shorter throw distance
    This projector has a lower throw distance than the average projector (0.5 m vs 1 m). The average projector has 1.0055 m of throw distance.
    Measured in meters.
    0.5 m vs 1.0055 m
  • Smartphone app support
    This projector supports smartphone app control, while the average projector does not. 36.7% of projectors support smartphone app control.
    AurzenHub app.
  • Includes stereo speakers
    This projector has stereo speakers, while the average projector does not. 47.8% of projectors have stereo speakers.
    dual 1W speaker.
  • Supports AirPlay
    This projector supports AirPlay, while the average projector does not. 40.3% of projectors offer this.
  • Includes built-in battery
    This projector has a built-in battery, while the average projector does not. 6.3% of projectors have one.
  • 11.8% higher list score
    List score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (5)
    List score: in 5 of 102 lists (5%)
    8.5 vs 7.6
  • Supports pixel shifting
    This projector supports pixel shifting, while the average projector does not. 26.6% of projectors support pixel shifting.
    Via XPR technology.
  • 4 more recent release
    This projector was released more recently than the average projector (2025 vs 2021). The average projector was released in 2021.
    April 2025
    2025 vs 2021
  • Advanced focus control
    This projector offers more advanced focus control than the average projector (auto-focus vs manual). Typical projector: manual.
    Manual remote fine-tuning available.
    auto-focus vs manual
  • Supports auto keystone correction
    This projector corrects keystone distortion automatically, while the average projector does not. 36.9% of projectors offer this.
  • 0.51 m shorter throw distance
    This projector has a lower throw distance than the average projector (0.5 m vs 1 m). The average projector has 1.0055 m of throw distance.
    Measured in meters.
    0.5 m vs 1.0055 m
  • Motorized focus
    This projector supports motorized focus, while the average projector does not. 45.6% of projectors support motorized focus.
    Remote-controlled electronic focus.
  • Supports AirPlay
    This projector supports AirPlay, while the average projector does not. 40.3% of projectors offer this.
  • Supports Miracast mirroring
    This projector supports Miracast, while the average projector does not. 46.4% of projectors offer this.
    Via Wi-Fi Direct.
  • Smartphone app support
    This projector supports smartphone app control, while the average projector does not. 36.7% of projectors support smartphone app control.
    AurzenHub app.
  • Includes stereo speakers
    This projector has stereo speakers, while the average projector does not. 47.8% of projectors have stereo speakers.
    dual 1W speaker.
  • Includes built-in battery
    This projector has a built-in battery, while the average projector does not. 6.3% of projectors have one.
  • 206 W lower power use
    This projector uses less power than the average projector (24 W vs 230 W). The average projector uses 230 W of power.
    24 W vs 230 W
  • 90.6% lighter weight
    This projector is lighter than the average projector (0.3 kg vs 2.98 kg). The average projector weighs 2.98 kg.
    0.28 kg vs 2.98 kg
  • 3 dB quieter operation
    This projector has a lower audible noise than the average projector (28 dB vs 31 dB). The average projector has 31 dB of audible noise.
    Eco mode figure.
    28 dB vs 31 dB
  • 219 mm narrower width
    This projector is narrower than the average projector (78 mm vs 297 mm). The average projector has a width of 297 mm.
    78 mm vs 297 mm
  • 96 mm lower height
    This projector is shorter than the average projector (26 mm vs 122 mm). The average projector has a height of 122 mm.
    26 mm vs 122 mm
  • 124 mm thinner body
    This projector is thinner than the average projector (26 mm vs 150 mm). The average projector has a thickness of 150 mm.
    Folded thickness.
    26 mm vs 150 mm
  • 95.5% dimmer image
    This projector has lower ANSI lumens than the average projector (100 vs 2,200). The average projector has 2,200 ANSI lumens.
    100 vs 2,200
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This projector has a lower contrast ratio than the average projector (300:1 vs 10000:1). The average projector has 10000:1 of contrast ratio.
    Native contrast ratio.
    300:1 vs 10,000:1
  • No HDR10 support
    This projector does not support HDR10, while the average projector does. 57.6% of projectors support HDR10.
  • Low native resolution
    This projector has a lower native panel resolution than the average projector (1280x720 vs 1920x1080). The average projector has a native panel resolution of 1920x1080.
    1280x720 vs 1920x1080
  • Lower output resolution
    This projector supports a lower output resolution than the average projector (1280x720 vs 1920x1080). The average projector outputs at 1920x1080 resolution.
    1280x720 vs 1920x1080
  • 2 fewer HDMI ports
    This projector has fewer HDMI ports than the average projector (0 vs 2). The average projector has 2 HDMI ports.
    0 vs 2
  • 2 bit lower color depth
    This projector has a lower color depth than the average projector (8 bit vs 10 bit). The average projector has 10 bit of color depth.
    8 bit vs 10 bit
  • 27.0% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.8 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 94% of models

    5.4

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.7

    Average grade

    20%

    9.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (30)
    18 reviews: 11 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.4 vs 7.4
  • 27.0% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.8 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 94% of models

    5.4

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.7

    Average grade

    20%

    9.4

    Popularity

    Grades by review (30)
    18 reviews: 11 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.4 vs 7.4
  • 28.0% lower sentiment score
    5.4 vs 7.5
  • 95.5% dimmer image
    This projector has lower ANSI lumens than the average projector (100 vs 2,200). The average projector has 2,200 ANSI lumens.
    100 vs 2,200
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This projector has a lower contrast ratio than the average projector (300:1 vs 10000:1). The average projector has 10000:1 of contrast ratio.
    Native contrast ratio.
    300:1 vs 10,000:1
  • No HDR10 support
    This projector does not support HDR10, while the average projector does. 57.6% of projectors support HDR10.
  • Low native resolution
    This projector has a lower native panel resolution than the average projector (1280x720 vs 1920x1080). The average projector has a native panel resolution of 1920x1080.
    1280x720 vs 1920x1080
  • Lower output resolution
    This projector supports a lower output resolution than the average projector (1280x720 vs 1920x1080). The average projector outputs at 1920x1080 resolution.
    1280x720 vs 1920x1080
  • 2 bit lower color depth
    This projector has a lower color depth than the average projector (8 bit vs 10 bit). The average projector has 10 bit of color depth.
    8 bit vs 10 bit
  • 29.4% lower refresh rate
    This projector has a lower refresh rate than the average projector (60 Hz vs 85 Hz). The average projector has 85 Hz of refresh rate.
    60 Hz vs 85 Hz
  • No 3D video
    This projector does not support 3D video, while the average projector does. 55.4% of projectors support 3D video.
  • 0.31 inch smaller DMD chip
    This projector has a lower DMD chip size than the average projector (0.2 inch vs 0.47 inch). The average projector has 0.47 inch of DMD chip size.
    0.16 inch vs 0.47 inch
  • No 3D glasses support
    This projector does not display 3D with glasses, while the average projector does. 54.4% of projectors offer 3D with glasses.
  • 5 degrees less vertical correction
    This projector offers less vertical keystone correction than the average projector (25 degrees vs 30 degrees). The average projector offers vertical keystone correction of 30 degrees.
    25 degrees vs 30 degrees
  • 23 ms higher input lag
    This projector has a higher input lag than the average projector (50 ms vs 27 ms). The average projector has 27 ms of input lag.
    In Game Mode.
    50 ms vs 27 ms
  • Limited HDMI format
    This projector supports a less capable max HDMI input format than the average projector (4K/60Hz vs 4K/120Hz). The average projector supports a max HDMI input format of 4K/120Hz.
    Higher-resolution input is downscaled to the native image.
    4K/60Hz vs 4K/120Hz
  • 2 fewer HDMI ports
    This projector has fewer HDMI ports than the average projector (0 vs 2). The average projector has 2 HDMI ports.
    0 vs 2
  • No Wi-Fi connectivity
    This projector does not connect to Wi-Fi networks, while the average projector does. 53.4% of projectors offer this.
  • No RS-232 control
    This projector does not support RS-232 control, while the average projector does. 50.6% of projectors support RS-232 control.
  • 80% weaker audio output
    This projector has a lower audio output power than the average projector (2 W vs 10 W). The average projector has 10 W of audio output power.
    2 W vs 10 W
  • No remote control
    This projector does not include a remote control, while the average projector does. 98.5% of projectors include a remote control.
  • Basic light source
    This projector has Basic light source than the average projector (led vs laser). The average projector uses a laser light source.
    led vs laser

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Tech With RR
≈ estimated
05/12/2025
Hands-on review · months of use and setup
Verdict
Aurzen Zip is worth buying for its design and wireless convenience, though it is not cheap.
8.0
TECHNO TESTED
≈ estimated
18/11/2025
Hands-on review · portability, picture and mirroring tests
Verdict
Aurzen Zip suits casual viewing and travel, but its brightness, 720p resolution and lack of built-in streaming hold it back.
7.0
WhatGear
≈ estimated
06/05/2025
Hands-on review · travel use and picture tests
Verdict
Aurzen Zip suits travel and small groups in a dark room, but limited brightness and a 720p picture hold it back.
9.0
Spencer Scott Pugh
≈ estimated
14/02/2025
Hands-on review · setup, brightness and Mac connection
Verdict
Aurzen Zip is a surprisingly easy pocket projector that's a nice extra to have, though its fan is audible.
7.5
Chigz Tech Reviews
✓ explicit
06/02/2025
Hands-on review · phone mirroring, PS5 and Mac tests
Verdict
Aurzen Zip is decent for phone mirroring and streaming in a dark room, but not for gaming.
8.0
Tech Steve
≈ estimated
20/01/2025
Hands-on review · room projection and phone mirroring tests
Verdict
Aurzen Zip is a good concept and recommended for many, though it's dim, with weak speakers and some fan noise.
9.0
Manny Rataul
≈ estimated
28/07/2025
Review · design, connectivity and features
Verdict
Aurzen Zip is recommended for anyone wanting a tiny, easy-to-connect projector, though it works best in darkness.
9.0
MrBlack
≈ estimated
23/07/2025
Hands-on review · portability, casting and picture tests
Verdict
Aurzen Zip is a great little travel projector, but not a replacement for a main home theater projector.
8.0
ArmadilloTech
≈ estimated
Prototype hands-on review · features and screen mirroring tests
Verdict
Aurzen Zip is still a prototype, but its image quality is impressive for such a small, portable projector.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Brand video
Brand video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
27/03/2026
Hands-on test · Tri-fold projector
Verdict
The Aurzen Zip is surprisingly bright for its size, suits dark rooms and phone content, but lasts about 90 minutes on battery and needs a dongle for streaming.
5.0
gizmodo.com
✓ explicit
06/04/2025
Hands-on review · Pocket projector
Verdict
The Aurzen Zip is a very portable projector for phone mirroring, but its dim picture, loud fan and short battery make it hard to recommend.
8.0
tomsguide.com
✓ explicit
16/04/2025
Hands-on review · Travel projector
Verdict
The Aurzen ZIP Tri-Fold is a bright, well-built travel projector that casts wirelessly to phones, laptops and consoles, but 720p and short battery life limit it.
8.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
21/06/2025
Lab test · Tri-fold projector
Verdict
The Aurzen Zip is a pocket projector with autofocus and wireless casting, good enough for quick presentations, but patterned slides can show wavy lines and the battery is short.
8.0
projectorsewing.com
≈ estimated
25/02/2025
Hands-on test · Sewing projector
Verdict
The Aurzen Zip is a tiny cordless projector for sewing patterns, best mounted 36 to 65 inches above a cutting mat in a dim room.
8.0
wearethemouth.com
✓ explicit
16/08/2026
Hands-on review · Travel projector
Verdict
The Aurzen Zip is a well-built projector for dark hotel rooms and vertical videos, but its battery lasts about an hour and streaming services need an extra dongle.
6.0
notebookcheck.com
✓ explicit
05/03/2025
Hands-on test · Pocket projector
Verdict
The Aurzen ZIP is a pocket projector that slips into a trouser pocket, but its dim 720p picture makes it more gadget than must-have.
5.0
futurezone.at
≈ estimated
07/10/2025
Everyday test · Pocket projector
Verdict
The Aurzen Zip is a fun pocket projector for unusual spots like kitchen walls and phone games, but its 720p picture and weak speakers rule out movie nights.
7.0
connect.de
✓ explicit
05/11/2025
Lab test · Folding projector
Verdict
The Aurzen Zip is a pocket-sized folding projector that shows a good picture from phones, but it has no HDMI and no picture settings.
6.0
winfuture.de
≈ estimated
11/11/2025
Practical test · Tri-fold projector
Verdict
The Aurzen Zip is a compact tri-fold projector that projects onto ceilings and stands on its own, but it only looks good in a fully dark room.
7.0
heise.de
✓ explicit
02/11/2025
Lab test · Battery projector
Verdict
The Aurzen Zip is a well-built pocket projector for phone screens, but its 720p image and 1.5-hour battery limit it to travel use.
8.0
planetkey.de
≈ estimated
25/09/2025
Hands-on test · Casual gaming
Verdict
The Aurzen Zip is a pocket projector with low lag for casual games like Mario Kart, but it is not suited to fast, competitive gaming.
7.0
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
10/09/2025
Practical test · Phone mirroring
Verdict
The Aurzen Zip is a folding projector that mirrors phones well for travel and short clips, but its low brightness makes it a poor choice for movie nights.
7.0
ecranlarge.com
✓ explicit
31/10/2025
Hands-on test · Pocket projector
Verdict
The Aurzen Zip is a folding projector that slips into a pocket and projects onto any wall or ceiling, but Netflix and Disney+ need an extra dongle.
8.0
zdnet.fr
≈ estimated
17/06/2025
Week-long test · Pocket projector
Verdict
The Aurzen Zip is a light, well-built projector that focuses instantly and shows color well in dark rooms, but it has no apps and can't stream protected services.
6.0
smartworld.it
≈ estimated
04/06/2025
Hands-on review · Tri-fold projector
Verdict
The Aurzen ZIP is a sturdy, clever tri-fold projector for travel, but streaming apps block mirroring and it suits simple viewing only.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Aurzen Zip

  • Unmatched portability; folds down to roughly the size of a wallet or a stack of Post-it notes.
  • Innovative tri-fold design allows for easy angle adjustment and ceiling projection without a tripod.
  • Reliable zero-lag autofocus and automatic vertical keystone correction for quick setup.
  • Seamless wireless screen mirroring from iOS, Android, and Windows devices without needing Wi-Fi.
  • Unique vertical full-screen mode specifically designed for viewing mobile content like TikTok and Reels.
  • Solid build quality with firm aluminum hinges that hold their shape well during use.

What customers don't like about Aurzen Zip

  • Low brightness at 100 ANSI lumens, making it strictly for use in very dark environments.
  • Short battery life, typically lasting between 45 to 90 minutes depending on brightness settings.
  • Loud internal fans that can overpower the small, underpowered 1W built-in speakers.
  • High price point compared to other pocket projectors with similar or better specs.
  • Lack of native HDMI port; requires a proprietary or optional dongle for wired connections.
  • Potential for dust issues behind the sealed lens, as noted by some early users on forums like Use code with caution.Copied to clipboardjsonRedditUse code with caution.Copied to clipboardjson.
  • Issues with DRM-protected content (like Netflix) on some devices unless using a specific HDMI dongle.

Verdict

The Aurzen Zip is an ultra-portable DLP projector featuring a unique Z-shaped tri-fold design that allows it to fold down to roughly the size of a wallet. It offers a native 720p resolution, 100 ANSI lumens of brightness, and uses a built-in 5,000mAh battery providing up to 90 minutes of cordless runtime with support for 24W PD fast charging. Key characteristics include ToF-powered zero-lag autofocus, automatic vertical keystone correction, and a dedicated vertical full-screen mode for mobile content like TikTok. Main pros are its extreme portability (weighing just 280g), versatile built-in stand, and easy Wi-Fi-free screen mirroring for iOS and Android. However, notable cons include its low brightness which requires a dark environment, the lack of an onboard operating system for native streaming apps, and audible fan noise during extended use at full power.

Compare Aurzen Zip with other products in the Projectors category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Aurzen Zip and other products in the Projectors category

No results found