OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Mice Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

HP X3000 G2 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Connectivity:wirelessMaximum polling rate:125 HzMaximum DPI:1600 DPIWeight:80 g

HP X3000 G2 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

5.5

Overall score

Score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

80%

4.5

Technical score

20%

9.4

User score

â–¼Worse than 70% of mice
4.5

Technical score

Technical score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

36%

3.4

Performance & Sensor

22%

4.2

Controls

16%

7.5

Design

14%

1.0

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

6.6

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 82% of mice
9.4

User score

User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 98% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 58,890 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 98% of mice
  • No image
No image

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse HP X3000 G2

Technical score
Technical score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components:

36%

3.4

Performance & Sensor

22%

4.2

Controls

16%

7.5

Design

14%

1.0

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

6.6

Battery & Charging

4.5
User score
User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 98% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 58,890 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.4
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Popularity:
HP X3000 G2 has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.5% of products in this category.
10
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components:

60%

5.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.8
Brand name
HP
Maximum polling rate
125 Hz
Maximum polling rate
125 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 75.8% of mice and equal to 23.9% of mice.
Wired polling rate
N/A
2.4 GHz polling rate
125 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
125 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 71.1% of mice and equal to 28.8% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
2.4GHz only.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
Connectivity
wireless
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This mouse supports wireless connectivity, which is more versatile than 35% of mice and equal to 21.7% of mice.
connection modes: 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
no
Bluetooth support
no
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
Receiver included
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
AA
Rechargeable battery
no
Rechargeable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 46% of models
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 78% of models
This mouse uses a removable battery. 77.8% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
3
N. of buttons
3
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 3 buttons, which is less than 91% of mice and equal to 8.5% of mice.
N. of side buttons
0
N. of side buttons
0
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 0 side buttons, which is less than 85.3% of mice and equal to 14.7% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
0
N. of programmable buttons
0
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, which is less than 83.4% of mice and equal to 16.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
no
DPI switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
This mouse does not include a DPI switching button. 85.4% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
ambidextrous
Weight
80 g
Weight
80 g
â–² Better than 52% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 80 g, which makes it lighter than 51.7% of mice and equal to 1% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
N/A
Cable type
N/A
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Onboard memory profiles
0
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
0 KB
Onboard memory size
0 KB
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has an onboard memory size of 0 KB, which is smaller than 12.6% of mice and equal to 87.4% of mice.
no onboard memory.
Software name
N/A
Firmware upgradable
no
Firmware upgradable
no
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
This mouse does not support firmware upgrades. 77.7% of mice support firmware upgrades.
Suitable for gaming
no
Suitable for gaming
no
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
This mouse is not suitable for gaming. 76.2% of mice are suitable for gaming.

HP X3000 G2 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • Removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This mouse uses a removable battery, while the average mouse does not. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
  • 18% higher user score
    User score
    9.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    HP X3000 G2
    the average mouse
    HP X3000 G2 has a higher user score than the average mouse (9.44 vs 8.000).
    9.44 vs 8
  • 56.6% more popular
    HP X3000 G2 is more popular than the average mouse (10 vs 6.4).
    10 vs 6.38
  • 9 mm narrower mouse width
    Width
    57 mm
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse is 57 mm wide, while the average mouse is 66 mm wide.
    57 mm vs 66 mm
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • 18% higher user score
    User score
    9.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    HP X3000 G2
    the average mouse
    HP X3000 G2 has a higher user score than the average mouse (9.44 vs 8.000).
    9.44 vs 8
  • 56.6% more popular
    HP X3000 G2 is more popular than the average mouse (10 vs 6.4).
    10 vs 6.38
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This mouse uses a removable battery, while the average mouse does not. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
  • 9 mm narrower mouse width
    Width
    57 mm
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse is 57 mm wide, while the average mouse is 66 mm wide.
    57 mm vs 66 mm
  • 6 fewer programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    0 vs 6
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    Maximum polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • No firmware upgrades
    Firmware upgradable
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This mouse does not support firmware upgrades, while the average mouse does. 77.6% of mice support firmware upgrades.
  • 84% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    1,600 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 1600 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    1,600 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • No adjustable DPI
    Adjustable DPI
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This mouse does not support adjustable DPI, while the average mouse does. 93.9% of mice support adjustable DPI.
  • 1,400 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    1,600 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 1600 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    1,600 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    2.4 GHz polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 7.1% worse value for money
    HP X3000 G2 has worse value for money than the average mouse (6.83 vs 7.3).
    6.83 vs 7.31
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    Maximum polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 84% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    1,600 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 1600 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    1,600 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • No adjustable DPI
    Adjustable DPI
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This mouse does not support adjustable DPI, while the average mouse does. 93.9% of mice support adjustable DPI.
  • 1,400 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    1,600 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 1600 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    1,600 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    2.4 GHz polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 6 fewer programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    0 vs 6
  • No DPI switching button
    DPI switching button
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    This mouse does not include a DPI switching button, while the average mouse does. 85.3% of mice include a DPI switching button.
  • 2 fewer side buttons
    N. of side buttons
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This mouse has 0 side buttons, while the average mouse has 2 side buttons.
    0 vs 2
  • 3 fewer buttons
    N. of buttons
    3
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <4 – >9
    This mouse has 3 buttons, while the average mouse has 6 buttons.
    3 vs 6
  • No RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • No firmware upgrades
    Firmware upgradable
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This mouse does not support firmware upgrades, while the average mouse does. 77.6% of mice support firmware upgrades.
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • Not suitable for gaming
    Suitable for gaming
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This mouse is not suitable for gaming, while the average mouse is. 76.1% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on 58,890 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about HP X3000 G2

  • Ease of installation with simple plug-and-play setup
  • Long-lasting battery life, reported up to 15 months
  • Compact and lightweight design ideal for travel and portable use
  • Comfortable ergonomic shape with side grips for better control
  • Ambidextrous design suitable for both left and right-handed users
  • Affordable price offering great value for money
  • Reliable 2.4GHz wireless connection with a stable range
  • Smooth and precise tracking at 1600 DPI across various surfaces

What we don't like about HP X3000 G2

  • Small size may be uncomfortable for users with larger hands
  • Basic feature set with no extra programmable buttons
  • Lack of adjustable DPI settings or sensitivity customization
  • Requires a USB-A receiver (no Bluetooth support)
  • Non-rechargeable (requires a physical AA battery)
  • Some users reported difficulty opening the battery compartment
  • Build quality feels lightweight or 'low quality' to some reviewers
  • Potential for lag on certain surfaces or if the receiver is missing

Verdict

The HP X3000 G2 is a compact, ambidextrous wireless mouse featuring a 1600 DPI optical sensor and Blue LED multi-surface technology for reliable tracking on various surfaces. It utilizes a 2.4 GHz wireless connection via a storable USB-A nano receiver with a range of up to 10 metres. Key pros include an impressive battery life of up to 15 months on a single AA battery, a contoured design for all-day comfort in either hand, and broad compatibility across Windows, Mac, and Chrome OS. However, it lacks advanced features such as adjustable DPI settings, programmable side buttons, and Bluetooth connectivity, and its small size may be uncomfortable for users with larger hands during extended use.

Compare HP X3000 G2 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of HP X3000 G2 and other products in the Mice category

No results found