OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Tristar MX-4851 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Power:350 WCordless:noWeight:0.9 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Tristar MX-4851 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Tristar MX-4851
6.6/10

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

65%

5.7

Technical score

25%

8.5

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 69% of immersion blenders
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 58%
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

45%

4.2

Performance

20%

7.3

Accessories

15%

6.3

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.6

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 78%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models

70%

8.6

Rating

30%

8.2

Popularity

â–²Better than 50%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • tristar-mx-4851
  • tristar-mx-4851
  • tristar-mx-4851
  • tristar-mx-4851
  • tristar-mx-4851
tristar-mx-4851
tristar-mx-4851
tristar-mx-4851
tristar-mx-4851
tristar-mx-4851
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Tristar MX-4851

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

45%

4.2

Performance

20%

7.3

Accessories

15%

6.3

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.6

Dimensions

5.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components:

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.6
Power
350 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 350 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 74.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 4.3% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
3
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
500 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 500 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 14.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 59.2% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
700 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 700 ml, which is larger than the cup of 47% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 21% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Plastic
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
no
This immersion blender does not support a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1 m, which is shorter reach than 82% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 14.4% of immersion blenders.
Weight
0.9 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.9 kg, which is lighter in hand than 70.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 4.7% of immersion blenders.
Height
35 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 35 cm in height, which is more compact than 83.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.9% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
6.5x 6.5

Tristar MX-4851 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (35 cm vs 40 cm).
    35 cm vs 40 cm
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 17.4% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.9 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.9 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 2.25x cheaper
    Tristar MX-4851 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£20 vs £45).
    £20 vs £45
  • 7.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 50% of models

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    8.2

    Popularity

    8.5 vs 7.9
  • 2.25x cheaper
    Tristar MX-4851 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£20 vs £45).
    £20 vs £45
  • 7.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 50% of models

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    8.2

    Popularity

    8.5 vs 7.9
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (35 cm vs 40 cm).
    35 cm vs 40 cm
  • 17.4% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.9 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.9 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 350 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (350 W vs 700 W).
    350 W vs 700 W
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a no-splash design
    This immersion blender does not support a no-splash design while the average immersion blender does.
  • 0.2 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1 m vs 1.2 m
  • 1.8% worse value for money
    Tristar MX-4851 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.59 vs 7.7).
    7.59 vs 7.73
  • 1.8% worse value for money
    Tristar MX-4851 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.59 vs 7.7).
    7.59 vs 7.73
  • 350 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (350 W vs 700 W).
    350 W vs 700 W
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a no-splash design
    This immersion blender does not support a no-splash design while the average immersion blender does.
  • 0.2 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1 m vs 1.2 m

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Tristar MX-4851

  • Good value for money as an inexpensive budget option.
  • Comes with a versatile 4-in-1 accessory kit including a chopper, whisk, and measuring beaker.
  • Ergonomic handle shape makes it comfortable to grip during operation.
  • Detachable parts and extra-long stick allow for easy disassembly and cleaning.
  • Equipped with stainless steel blades that perform well for basic pureeing, smooth making, and soup preparation.
  • Compact structure makes it space-saving and effortless to store in small kitchens.

What customers don't like about Tristar MX-4851

  • The 350W motor has limited power and may struggle or take longer with very hard, thick, or fibrous ingredients.
  • Risk of motor overheating if used continuously on heavy batches or thick recipes.
  • Features only basic speed selections, lacking advanced multi-speed variables.
  • The plastic main housing structure feels less premium compared to high-end stainless steel alternatives.

Verdict

The Tristar MX-4851 is a versatile 350W hand blender set equipped with an extra-long detachable plastic shaft, durable stainless steel blades, and two speed settings including a turbo function. The comprehensive package serves as a multifunctional kitchen companion by including a 500 ml chopper, a whisk attachment, and a 700 ml measuring cup beaker. Main advantages of this model include its lightweight, ergonomic design for a comfortable grip, easy disassembly for streamlined cleaning, and a broad range of capabilities from whipping cream to pureeing soups. However, its 350W motor may struggle with heavy-duty tasks like crushing ice or hard nuts, and the lack of dishwasher-safe parts or non-slip feet can make maintenance and operation slightly less convenient.

Compare Tristar MX-4851 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Tristar MX-4851 and other immersion blenders

No results found