OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Tescoma 908640 Cordless Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£120Power:180 WCordless:yesWeight:1.8 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Tescoma 908640 Cordless Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Tescoma 908640 Cordless
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components

65%

6.4

Technical score

25%

?

User scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 8.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

▼Worse than 56% of immersion blenders
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

▼Worse than 73%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components

45%

4.6

Performance

20%

7.7

Accessories

15%

8.4

Design

10%

8.3

Usability

10%

7.4

Dimensions

▼Worse than 56%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
No ratings from across the web yet, so it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
No ratings from across the web yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • tescoma-908640-cordless
  • tescoma-908640-cordless
  • tescoma-908640-cordless
  • tescoma-908640-cordless
  • tescoma-908640-cordless
  • tescoma-908640-cordless
  • tescoma-908640-cordless
  • tescoma-908640-cordless
tescoma-908640-cordless
tescoma-908640-cordless
tescoma-908640-cordless
tescoma-908640-cordless
tescoma-908640-cordless
tescoma-908640-cordless
tescoma-908640-cordless
tescoma-908640-cordless
Where to buy
    N/A~ £120
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Tescoma 908640 Cordless

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components:

45%

4.6

Performance

20%

7.7

Accessories

15%

8.4

Design

10%

8.3

Usability

10%

7.4

Dimensions

6.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

7.2
Power
180 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 180 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 93% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3.2% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
3
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 3 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 53.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
18,500 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 18,500 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 93.1% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
yes
This immersion blender supports cordless operation.
Battery type
Lithium-ion
Show more
Number of accessories
3
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
700 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 700 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 86.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.4% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
700 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 700 ml, which is larger than the cup of 47% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 21% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
-
Weight
1.8 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.8 kg, which is heavier in hand than 81.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.9% of immersion blenders.
Height
43.5 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 43.5 cm in height, which is taller than 82.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.4% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Tescoma 908640 Cordless vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 4,000 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (18,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    18,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 200 ml larger chopper volume
    This immersion blender chops whole onions, large bunches of herbs, and portions of meat in a single batch without overloading compared to the average immersion blender (700 ml vs 500 ml).
    700 ml vs 500 ml
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 1 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 4,000 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (18,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    18,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 1 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 200 ml larger chopper volume
    This immersion blender chops whole onions, large bunches of herbs, and portions of meat in a single batch without overloading compared to the average immersion blender (700 ml vs 500 ml).
    700 ml vs 500 ml
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 520 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (180 W vs 700 W).
    180 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 65.3% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.8 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.8 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 50 min slower charging time
    This immersion blender remains tied to the charging dock longer before restoring full wireless operation compared to the average immersion blender (180 min vs 130 min).
    180 min vs 130 min
  • 3.5 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (43.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    43.5 cm vs 40 cm
  • 2.67x more expensive
    This immersion blender is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£120 vs £45).
    £120 vs £45
  • 7.4% worse value for money
    This immersion blender has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.19 vs 7.7).
    7.19 vs 7.73
  • 2.67x more expensive
    This immersion blender is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£120 vs £45).
    £120 vs £45
  • 7.4% worse value for money
    This immersion blender has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.19 vs 7.7).
    7.19 vs 7.73
  • 520 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (180 W vs 700 W).
    180 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 50 min slower charging time
    This immersion blender remains tied to the charging dock longer before restoring full wireless operation compared to the average immersion blender (180 min vs 130 min).
    180 min vs 130 min
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 65.3% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.8 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.8 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 3.5 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (43.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    43.5 cm vs 40 cm

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Tescoma 908640 Cordless

  • Cordless design offers freedom of movement without power cable limitations
  • Versatile 3-stage adaptive handle adjusts angles (180°, 135°, and 90°) for comfortable handling depending on the attachment used
  • Comes with a comprehensive accessory pack including a blending container, chopping bowl, and wire whisk
  • Features a space-saving charging base that keeps the kitchen countertop organized
  • Variable speed control and built-in pulse function allow for precise blending and chopping textures
  • Constructed from high-grade stainless steel and robust, premium materials

What customers don't like about Tescoma 908640 Cordless

  • The 180-watt motor power is lower compared to standard corded models
  • Device utility relies entirely on battery life and requires regular charging intervals
  • Higher weight profile due to the built-in 7.4V Li-ion battery assembly

Verdict

The Tescoma 908640 GrandCHEF is a cordless immersion blender featuring a built-in 7.4 V / 2,000 mAh Li-ion battery, an output power of 180 W, and an adjustable speed range from 9,000 to 18,500 RPM. Constructed from high-grade stainless steel and resistant plastic, it comes equipped with a 700 ml blending container, a 700 ml chopping container, a wire whisk, and an innovative space-saving charging port. The primary advantages include complete mobility away from outlets, a pulse function for precise blending control, and an ergonomic, adaptive handle that angles to 180°, 135°, or 90° for optimized comfort across different attachments. However, its 180 W output is significantly lower than traditional corded blenders, which may limit its ability to quickly process highly dense or tough ingredients.

Compare Tescoma 908640 Cordless with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Tescoma 908640 Cordless and other immersion blenders

No results found