OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Tarrington House STM8000 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Power:800 WCordless:noWeight:?Stepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Tarrington House STM8000 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Tarrington House STM8000
6.5/10

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

65%

6.4

Technical score

25%

6.4

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 69% of immersion blenders
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

â–¼Worse than 62%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components

45%

6.4

Performance

20%

4.5

Accessories

15%

8.5

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

8.2

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 56%
6.4

User score

User score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

6.4

Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.9

Rating

30%

5.6

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 82%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • tarrington-house-stm8000
  • tarrington-house-stm8000
  • tarrington-house-stm8000
  • tarrington-house-stm8000
tarrington-house-stm8000
tarrington-house-stm8000
tarrington-house-stm8000
tarrington-house-stm8000
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Tarrington House STM8000

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components:

45%

6.4

Performance

20%

4.5

Accessories

15%

8.5

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

8.2

Dimensions

6.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components:

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

7.5
Power
800 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 800 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 57.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.7% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
?
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
16,500 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 16,500 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 82.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.2% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
1
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 1 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 55.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 24.1% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
550 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 550 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 91.6% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
?
Weight
?
Height
41 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 41 cm in height, which is taller than 61.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 6.7% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Tarrington House STM8000 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 2,000 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (16,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    16,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 100 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (800 W vs 700 W).
    800 W vs 700 W
  • 28.6% cheaper
    Tarrington House STM8000 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£35 vs £45).
    £35 vs £45
  • 28.6% cheaper
    Tarrington House STM8000 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£35 vs £45).
    £35 vs £45
  • 2,000 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (16,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    16,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 100 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (800 W vs 700 W).
    800 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 150 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (550 ml vs 700 ml).
    550 ml vs 700 ml
  • 19.0% lower user score
    User score
    6.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

    6.4

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.9

    Rating

    30%

    5.6

    Popularity

    6.4 vs 7.9
  • 1 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 1 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (41 cm vs 40 cm).
    41 cm vs 40 cm
  • 3.3% worse value for money
    Tarrington House STM8000 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.48 vs 7.7).
    7.48 vs 7.73
  • 19.0% lower user score
    User score
    6.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models

    6.4

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.9

    Rating

    30%

    5.6

    Popularity

    6.4 vs 7.9
  • 3.3% worse value for money
    Tarrington House STM8000 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.48 vs 7.7).
    7.48 vs 7.73
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 150 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (550 ml vs 700 ml).
    550 ml vs 700 ml
  • 1 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 1 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (41 cm vs 40 cm).
    41 cm vs 40 cm

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Tarrington House STM8000

  • Powerful 800W motor ensures quick and efficient blending
  • Adjustable variable speed control allows precise texture management
  • Removable stainless steel blending wand is easy to clean
  • Non-electronic attachments are completely dishwasher safe
  • Includes a convenient 550ml to 700ml graduated measuring beaker
  • Ergonomic handle provides a comfortable and secure grip

What customers don't like about Tarrington House STM8000

  • Can feel heavy and substantial during extended blending sessions
  • Main motor housing can only be wiped down and is not submersible
  • Included plastic beaker capacity is relatively small for large soup batches
  • Standard dual-blade system might struggle with extremely dense or fibrous ingredients

Verdict

The Tarrington House STM8000 is an 800-watt corded electric immersion blender featuring a durable, detachable stainless steel shaft and a two-blade system with a 50 mm blade diameter. It operates at up to 15,000 RPM with a variable speed control dial and push-button operation to mix and puree efficiently. Main advantages include a robust 800W motor, a 550 ml measuring beaker, and dishwasher-safe non-electrical parts that make cleanup simple. However, potential drawbacks include a basic push-button design that lacks advanced preset functions, and its dual-blade configuration may struggle with dense, fibrous, or heavily textured ingredients compared to multi-blade alternatives.

Compare Tarrington House STM8000 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Tarrington House STM8000 and other immersion blenders

No results found