OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Stalwart 3-in-1 800W Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£60Power:800 WCordless:noWeight:1.1 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Stalwart 3-in-1 800W Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

7.4/10

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Score components

65%

7.2

Technical score

25%

?

User scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 8.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 59% of immersion blenders
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

â–²Better than 55%
7.2

Technical score

Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models
Score components

45%

6.5

Performance

20%

7.9

Accessories

15%

8.3

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

8.7

Dimensions

â–²Better than 62%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
No ratings from across the web yet, so it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
No ratings from across the web yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Stalwart 3-in-1 800W

Technical score
Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models
Score components:

45%

6.5

Performance

20%

7.9

Accessories

15%

8.3

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

8.7

Dimensions

7.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components:

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

7.9
Power
800 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 800 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 57.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.7% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
?
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
?
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
yes
This immersion blender designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
?
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
?
Weight
1.1 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.1 kg, which is heavier in hand than 50.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.6% of immersion blenders.
Height
41 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 41 cm in height, which is taller than 61.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 6.7% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
150x 200

Stalwart 3-in-1 800W vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 100 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (800 W vs 700 W).
    800 W vs 700 W
  • 2.6% better value for money
    Stalwart 3-in-1 800W has better value for money than the average immersion blender (7.92 vs 7.7).
    7.92 vs 7.73
  • 2.6% better value for money
    Stalwart 3-in-1 800W has better value for money than the average immersion blender (7.92 vs 7.7).
    7.92 vs 7.73
  • 100 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (800 W vs 700 W).
    800 W vs 700 W
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 1 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (41 cm vs 40 cm).
    41 cm vs 40 cm
  • 1% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.1 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 33.3% more expensive
    Stalwart 3-in-1 800W is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£60 vs £45).
    £60 vs £45
  • 33.3% more expensive
    Stalwart 3-in-1 800W is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£60 vs £45).
    £60 vs £45
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 1 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (41 cm vs 40 cm).
    41 cm vs 40 cm
  • 1% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.1 kg vs 1.089 kg

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Stalwart 3-in-1 800W

  • Powerful 800W motor easily handles various ingredients from soft purees to frozen fruits
  • Versatile 3-in-1 design includes functional interchangeable attachments like a whisk and frother
  • Ergonomic, non-slip handle ensures comfortable operation and reduces hand strain
  • Features precise variable speed controls along with a convenient turbo mode boost
  • Easy to clean with a detachable stainless steel shaft and dishwasher-safe attachments

What customers don't like about Stalwart 3-in-1 800W

  • High power can create a strong suction vacuum that causes the blender to stick to container bottoms
  • Top-heavy and bulky motor unit can feel unbalanced and make one-handed speed adjustments awkward
  • Motor base tends to heat up or vibrate noticeably during continuous heavy-duty mixing
  • Wide splash guard design may prevent the blending head from fitting into narrow-mouthed mason jars
  • Loud operating noise can become annoying during extended blending sessions

Verdict

The Stalwart 3-in-1 Immersion Blender is powered by a robust 800-watt copper DC motor and features three versatile kitchen configurations, including a detachable stainless steel blending rod, a whisk attachment, and a 500 ml food chopper. Engineered with variable multi-speed settings and a turbo boost mode, this handheld tool utilizes durable 304 stainless steel S-shaped blades and an anti-splash guard design to comfortably process everything from pureed soups to frozen fruit smoothies. Its primary pros include exceptional raw power for heavy-duty blending, a comfortable ergonomic grip, and detachable, dishwasher-safe components that ensure hassle-free cleaning. However, notable cons include heightened motor vibration during extended turbo operation and a lack of cordless flexibility due to its tethered electric power source.

Compare Stalwart 3-in-1 800W with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Stalwart 3-in-1 800W and other immersion blenders

No results found