OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Smeg HBF22 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£120Power:700 WCordless:noWeight:2.1 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Smeg HBF22 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Smeg HBF22
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

65%

6.7

Technical score

25%

6.7

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 62% of immersion blenders
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

â–¼Worse than 75%
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components

45%

5.3

Performance

20%

8.6

Accessories

15%

8.7

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.0

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 51%
6.7

User score

User score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models

6.7

Mark 8.1 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

9.0

Rating

30%

5.9

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 78%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • smeg-hbf22wheu
smeg-hbf22wheu
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Smeg HBF22

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components:

45%

5.3

Performance

20%

8.6

Accessories

15%

8.7

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.0

Dimensions

6.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

7.1
Power
700 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 700 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 48.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.3% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
14,850 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 14,850 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 51.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 4.8% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
4
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 4 attachments, which is more versatile than 83% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 11.4% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
500 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 500 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 14.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 59.2% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
1,400 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 1,400 ml, which is larger than the cup of 96.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
1.5 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.5 m, which is longer reach than 63.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 12.3% of immersion blenders.
Weight
2.1 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 2.1 kg, which is heavier in hand than 87.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.7% of immersion blenders.
Height
41.3 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 41.3 cm in height, which is taller than 69.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.9% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
6.5x 6.5

Smeg HBF22 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 2 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (4 vs 2).
    4 vs 2
  • Includes the potato masher
    This immersion blender includes the potato masher while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 700 ml larger beaker volume
    This immersion blender accommodates larger smoothies and milkshakes without ingredients splashing over the beaker rim compared to the average immersion blender (1,400 ml vs 700 ml).
    1,400 ml vs 700 ml
  • 0.3 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (1.5 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.5 m vs 1.2 m
  • 350 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (14,850 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    14,850 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 350 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (14,850 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    14,850 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 2 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (4 vs 2).
    4 vs 2
  • Includes the potato masher
    This immersion blender includes the potato masher while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 700 ml larger beaker volume
    This immersion blender accommodates larger smoothies and milkshakes without ingredients splashing over the beaker rim compared to the average immersion blender (1,400 ml vs 700 ml).
    1,400 ml vs 700 ml
  • 0.3 m longer power cord
    This immersion blender reaches easily from distant wall sockets straight to your cooktop without pulling taut compared to the average immersion blender (1.5 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.5 m vs 1.2 m
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 92.8% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (2.1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    2.1 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 15.2% lower user score
    User score
    6.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models

    6.7

    Mark 8.1 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    9.0

    Rating

    30%

    5.9

    Popularity

    6.7 vs 7.9
  • 1.3 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (41.3 cm vs 40 cm).
    41.3 cm vs 40 cm
  • 2.67x more expensive
    Smeg HBF22 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£120 vs £45).
    £120 vs £45
  • 9.2% worse value for money
    Smeg HBF22 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.07 vs 7.7).
    7.07 vs 7.73
  • 15.2% lower user score
    User score
    6.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models

    6.7

    Mark 8.1 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    9.0

    Rating

    30%

    5.9

    Popularity

    6.7 vs 7.9
  • 2.67x more expensive
    Smeg HBF22 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£120 vs £45).
    £120 vs £45
  • 9.2% worse value for money
    Smeg HBF22 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.07 vs 7.7).
    7.07 vs 7.73
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 92.8% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (2.1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    2.1 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 1.3 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (41.3 cm vs 40 cm).
    41.3 cm vs 40 cm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Smeg HBF22

  • Iconic and aesthetically pleasing 50s retro-style design
  • Powerful 700-watt motor that effortlessly handles tough ingredients
  • Versatile performance thanks to a comprehensive set of accessories including a whisk, chopper, and masher
  • Ergonomic, anti-slip handle that provides a comfortable and secure grip
  • Innovative FlowBlend system that effectively minimizes suction and ensures smooth blending
  • Precise speed management via multiple variable settings and a dedicated Turbo function
  • Relatively quiet operation compared to several competing immersion blenders
  • Eco-friendly Tritan Renew beaker and chopper container made from 50% recycled plastic

What customers don't like about Smeg HBF22

  • Premium price tag that makes it significantly more expensive than many competitors
  • Subpar overall build quality with a reliance on plastic mechanisms that feel less sturdy
  • Bulky footprint that requires considerable storage space for all the included attachments
  • Less effective at perfectly processing highly fibrous ingredients compared to some rival models

Verdict

The Smeg HBF22 is a 50s retro-style immersion blender equipped with a 700 W motor, an adjustable speed control knob ranging from a minimum of 8150 RPM to a maximum of 14850 RPM, and an integrated Turbo function. It features an ergonomic, anti-slip handle and an efficient stainless steel FlowBlend cutting system designed to ensure optimal food preparation. This comprehensive set includes a 1.4-liter Tritan Renew graduated beaker, a 0.5-liter chopper, a potato masher, and a stainless steel wire whisk. Key pros include its multi-functional versatility for tasks like pureeing and chopping, dishwasher-safe removable parts, eco-friendly recycled components, and a generous 1.5-meter power cord. However, notable cons include its high-end price point and a predominantly plastic main housing assembly that may feel less robust than solid metal alternatives.

Compare Smeg HBF22 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Smeg HBF22 and other immersion blenders

No results found