OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

SARO XM-32 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£480Power:400 WCordless:noWeight:3.65 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:no

SARO XM-32 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

SARO XM-32
5.6/10

Overall score

Score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

65%

4.4

Technical score

25%

?

User scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 8.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 95% of immersion blenders
4.2

Value for money

Value for money
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

5.6

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

â–¼Worse than 99%
4.4

Technical score

Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

45%

3.6

Performance

20%

3.3

Accessories

15%

9.6

Design

10%

4.0

Usability

10%

3.4

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 99%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
No ratings from across the web yet, so it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
No ratings from across the web yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • saro-xm-32
saro-xm-32
Where to buy
    N/A~ £480
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Immersion Blenders model ranking

Ranked #719 of 725 models in Immersion Blenders (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of immersion blender SARO XM-32

Technical score
Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

45%

3.6

Performance

20%

3.3

Accessories

15%

9.6

Design

10%

4.0

Usability

10%

3.4

Dimensions

4.4
Value for money
Value for money
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

70%

5.6

Overall score

30%

1.0

Price

4.2
Power
400 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 400 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 69.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 4.7% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
1
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 1 speed levels, which is less adjustable than 79.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
12,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 12,000 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 77.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
yes
This immersion blender designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
no
This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
0
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 0 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 79.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.2% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Forged steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
?
Weight
3.65 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 3.65 kg, which is heavier in hand than 93.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.1% of immersion blenders.
Height
67.4 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 67.4 cm in height, which is taller than 94.3% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
92.2 (?)

SARO XM-32 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 300 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (400 W vs 700 W).
    400 W vs 700 W
  • 3.35x heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (3.7 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    3.65 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 2,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • 82.3% worse value for money
    SARO XM-32 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (4.24 vs 7.7).
    4.24 vs 7.73
  • 10.67x more expensive
    SARO XM-32 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£480 vs £45).
    £480 vs £45
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 300 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (400 W vs 700 W).
    400 W vs 700 W
  • 2,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 1 speed levels fewer
    This immersion blender has fewer speed increments, giving less nuance between gentle stirring and intense pureeing compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 3.35x heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (3.7 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    3.65 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 27.4 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (67.4 cm vs 40 cm).
    67.4 cm vs 40 cm

Third-party reviews

What customers like about SARO XM-32

  • High-quality, robust stainless steel construction built for heavy commercial use
  • Delivers very smooth, lump-free purees and sauces with high-quality results
  • Equipped with a powerful, long-lasting motor that can operate continuously without overheating
  • Ergonomic handle and anti-slip grip designed to minimize user fatigue
  • Detachable blending arm features a quick and secure click-on locking mechanism
  • Specially engineered blade guard effectively minimizes kitchen splashes
  • Large capacity capable of processing batches up to 45 liters (approx. 12 gallons)

What customers don't like about SARO XM-32

  • Operates at a single fixed speed (12,000 RPM) rather than a variable speed dial
  • Designed strictly for professional gastronomy use and is impractical for normal home kitchens
  • The large size and heavy weight (approx. 3.6 kg / 8 lbs) make it harder to handle for casual tasks

Verdict

The SARO XM-32 is a heavy-duty professional immersion blender powered by a 400-watt motor that operates at a fixed speed of 12,000 RPM, designed to handle large commercial batches in recipients up to 45 liters. Key characteristics and pros include its durable, forged steel Y-shaped cutting blade, an anti-slip ergonomic Bi-Mat-Grip to reduce user fatigue, a patented TiltStop system for enhanced workplace safety, and a 366 mm detachable stainless steel blending arm for easy cleaning and splash prevention. However, main cons include its single fixed-speed operation, which limits versatility for delicate textures, and a heavy net weight of 3.56 kg that makes it less suitable for casual home use.

Compare SARO XM-32 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of SARO XM-32 and other immersion blenders

No results found