OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Russell Hobbs 24702-56 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£60Power:500 WCordless:noWeight:0.8 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Russell Hobbs 24702-56 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications and 1 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Russell Hobbs 24702-56
6.5/10

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

65%

5.5

Technical score

25%

8.7

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 70% of immersion blenders
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

â–¼Worse than 69%
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

45%

3.3

Performance

20%

7.3

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.9

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 81%
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models

70%

8.2

Rating

30%

9.9

Popularity

â–²Better than 62%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • russell-hobbs-24702-56
  • russell-hobbs-24702-56
  • russell-hobbs-24702-56
  • russell-hobbs-24702-56
  • russell-hobbs-24702-56
  • russell-hobbs-24702-56
  • russell-hobbs-24702-56
  • russell-hobbs-24702-56
  • russell-hobbs-24702-56
russell-hobbs-24702-56
russell-hobbs-24702-56
russell-hobbs-24702-56
russell-hobbs-24702-56
russell-hobbs-24702-56
russell-hobbs-24702-56
russell-hobbs-24702-56
russell-hobbs-24702-56
russell-hobbs-24702-56
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Russell Hobbs 24702-56

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components:

45%

3.3

Performance

20%

7.3

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.9

Dimensions

5.5
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

7.3
Power
500 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 500 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 61.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 4.8% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
12,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 12,000 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 77.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
3
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
500 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 500 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 14.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 59.2% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
700 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 700 ml, which is larger than the cup of 47% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 21% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic, Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1.2 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.2 m, which is longer reach than 22.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 27.8% of immersion blenders.
Weight
0.8 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.8 kg, which is lighter in hand than 80.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 4.8% of immersion blenders.
Height
41.3 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 41.3 cm in height, which is taller than 69.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.9% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
8.8

Russell Hobbs 24702-56 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 26.5% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.8 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.8 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 10.1% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 62% of models

    70%

    8.2

    Rating

    30%

    9.9

    Popularity

    8.7 vs 7.9
  • 10.1% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 62% of models

    70%

    8.2

    Rating

    30%

    9.9

    Popularity

    8.7 vs 7.9
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 26.5% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.8 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.8 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 200 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (500 W vs 700 W).
    500 W vs 700 W
  • 1.3 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (41.3 cm vs 40 cm).
    41.3 cm vs 40 cm
  • 5.9% worse value for money
    Russell Hobbs 24702-56 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.3 vs 7.7).
    7.3 vs 7.73
  • 33.3% more expensive
    Russell Hobbs 24702-56 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£60 vs £45).
    £60 vs £45
  • 5.9% worse value for money
    Russell Hobbs 24702-56 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.3 vs 7.7).
    7.3 vs 7.73
  • 33.3% more expensive
    Russell Hobbs 24702-56 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£60 vs £45).
    £60 vs £45
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    12,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 200 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (500 W vs 700 W).
    500 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1.3 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (41.3 cm vs 40 cm).
    41.3 cm vs 40 cm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Matilda Brown
≈ estimated
17/01/2021
First look · unboxing and first impressions
Verdict
Russell Hobbs 24702-56 made a very positive first impression, though this is based on setup only.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Russell Hobbs 24702-56

  • Excellent value for money and highly affordable
  • Versatile 3-in-1 multi-functionality with blending, whisking, and chopping attachments
  • Detachable components are easy to clean and dishwasher-safe
  • Ergonomic handle shape makes it comfortable to hold and operate
  • Clever chopper bowl base doubles as a storage lid for the fridge
  • Effective 500W motor performance for everyday tasks like soups and smoothies

What customers don't like about Russell Hobbs 24702-56

  • Power cord is relatively short, limiting movement around the kitchen counter
  • Twist-lock mechanism for attachments can feel counter-intuitive or backwards at first
  • Only offers two speed settings which limits precise texture control
  • Not powerful enough for heavy daily commercial use or crushing ice cubes
  • Food can sometimes stick to the sides of the chopping bowl out of reach of the blade

Verdict

The Russell Hobbs 24702-56 Desire is a multi-functional 3-in-1 immersion blender featuring a 500-watt motor that reaches up to 12,000 RPM. This matte black appliance includes a detachable stainless steel blending leg, a 500 ml chopping bowl, a 700 ml beaker, and a balloon whisk attachment. Its primary advantages include dual-speed settings with a manual pulse function for texture control, versatile culinary applications, and easy cleanup via dishwasher-safe components. However, notable drawbacks include a relatively short power cord, a counter-intuitive twist-to-lock assembly mechanism, and an inability to handle heavy commercial workloads or crush ice.

Compare Russell Hobbs 24702-56 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Russell Hobbs 24702-56 and other immersion blenders

No results found