Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Powerblend M1 1200W Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Power:1200 WCordless:noWeight:1.58 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:no

Powerblend M1 1200W Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Powerblend M1 1200W
7.5/10

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

65%

7.5

Technical score

25%

7.5

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 62% of immersion blenders
8.1

Value for money

Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

â–²Better than 65%
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

45%

8.0

Performance

20%

7.4

Accessories

15%

9.3

Design

10%

4.0

Usability

10%

6.2

Dimensions

â–²Better than 69%
7.5

User score

User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

7.5

Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.3

Rating

30%

7.0

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 66%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • powerblend-m1-1200w
  • powerblend-m1-1200w
  • powerblend-m1-1200w
  • powerblend-m1-1200w
  • powerblend-m1-1200w
  • powerblend-m1-1200w
  • powerblend-m1-1200w
powerblend-m1-1200w
powerblend-m1-1200w
powerblend-m1-1200w
powerblend-m1-1200w
powerblend-m1-1200w
powerblend-m1-1200w
powerblend-m1-1200w
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Powerblend M1 1200W

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

45%

8.0

Performance

20%

7.4

Accessories

15%

9.3

Design

10%

4.0

Usability

10%

6.2

Dimensions

7.5
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

8.1
Power
1,200 W
This immersion blender delivers 1,200 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 86.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 7.3% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
15
This immersion blender features 15 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 83.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.1% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
18,000 RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 18,000 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 87.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
no
This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
3
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
500 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 500 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 14.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 59.2% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
0.85 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 0.85 m, which is shorter reach than 97.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.4% of immersion blenders.
Weight
1.58 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.58 kg, which is heavier in hand than 75.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.1% of immersion blenders.
Height
42 cm
This immersion blender stands 42 cm in height, which is taller than 77.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.6% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Powerblend M1 1200W vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 13 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (15 vs 2).
    15 vs 2
  • 500 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (1,200 W vs 700 W).
    1,200 W vs 700 W
  • 3,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (18,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    18,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 28.6% cheaper
    Powerblend M1 1200W is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£35 vs £45).
    £35 vs £45
  • 5.3% better value for money
    This immersion blender has better value for money than the average immersion blender (8.13 vs 7.7).
    8.13 vs 7.73
  • 28.6% cheaper
    Powerblend M1 1200W is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£35 vs £45).
    £35 vs £45
  • 5.3% better value for money
    This immersion blender has better value for money than the average immersion blender (8.13 vs 7.7).
    8.13 vs 7.73
  • 13 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (15 vs 2).
    15 vs 2
  • 500 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (1,200 W vs 700 W).
    1,200 W vs 700 W
  • 3,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (18,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    18,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 45.1% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.6 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.58 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 2 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (42 cm vs 40 cm).
    42 cm vs 40 cm
  • 0.35 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (0.9 m vs 1.2 m).
    0.85 m vs 1.2 m
  • 5.1% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    7.5

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.3

    Rating

    30%

    7.0

    Popularity

    7.5 vs 7.9
  • 5.1% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    7.5

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.3

    Rating

    30%

    7.0

    Popularity

    7.5 vs 7.9
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • 45.1% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.6 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.58 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 2 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (42 cm vs 40 cm).
    42 cm vs 40 cm
  • 0.35 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (0.9 m vs 1.2 m).
    0.85 m vs 1.2 m

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Powerblend M1 1200W

  • Unmatched 1200W motor power that easily handles both soft and hard ingredients
  • Versatile 4-in-1 functionality allows you to mix, puree, chop, and whisk with one tool
  • Highly customizable speed control featuring 15 variable speed settings plus a Turbo function
  • Ergonomic, lightweight body with a non-slip grip that minimizes hand fatigue during extended use
  • Durable, premium stainless steel design that is straightforward to clean with its removable blending rod
  • Comes with practical accessories including a 4-blade chopper, measuring cup, and an extra-long stirring stick to reach deep into pots

What customers don't like about Powerblend M1 1200W

  • The high power output may be excessive and unnecessary for occasional or casual users
  • Takes up a noticeable amount of storage space, making it less ideal for very compact kitchens
  • Can be relatively expensive for budget-conscious buyers compared to simpler, low-wattage alternative models

Verdict

The CoolHome Powerblend M1 is a high-performance 4-in-1 immersion hand blender featuring a robust 1200-watt motor housed in a durable stainless steel casing. Its primary characteristics include 15 variable speed settings, a powerful turbo boost function, an extra-long detachable mixing wand, and a versatile attachment set that comprises a 4-blade chopper, a whisk/mixer, and a measuring cup. Pros include its exceptional power to effortlessly process tough ingredients, an ergonomic non-slip grip that minimizes hand fatigue, and easy-to-clean detachable components. However, on the downside, the high power can cause accidental splashing if the user does not precisely manage the initial speed settings, and it lacks a dedicated storage box for its multiple accessories.

Compare Powerblend M1 1200W with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Powerblend M1 1200W and other immersion blenders

No results found