OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Philips HR3781/00 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Power:500 WCordless:noWeight:1.044 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Philips HR3781/00 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Philips HR3781/00
7.4/10

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Score components

65%

6.8

Technical score

25%

8.8

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 58% of immersion blenders
8.1

Value for money

Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 65% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

â–²Better than 65%
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components

45%

5.8

Performance

20%

7.0

Accessories

15%

9.3

Design

10%

6.8

Usability

10%

7.4

Dimensions

â–²Better than 52%
8.8

User score

User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 67% of models

70%

9.1

Rating

30%

7.9

Popularity

â–²Better than 67%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • philips-hr378100
  • philips-hr378100
  • philips-hr378100
  • philips-hr378100
  • philips-hr378100
  • philips-hr378100
  • philips-hr378100
  • philips-hr378100
  • philips-hr378100
  • philips-hr378100
philips-hr378100
philips-hr378100
philips-hr378100
philips-hr378100
philips-hr378100
philips-hr378100
philips-hr378100
philips-hr378100
philips-hr378100
philips-hr378100
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Immersion Blenders model ranking

Ranked #254 of 725 models in Immersion Blenders (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Philips HR3781/00

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components:

45%

5.8

Performance

20%

7.0

Accessories

15%

9.3

Design

10%

6.8

Usability

10%

7.4

Dimensions

6.8
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 65% of models
Score components:

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

8.1
Power
500 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 500 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 61.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 4.8% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
5
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 5 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 56.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8.7% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
13,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 13,000 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 64.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
?
Chopper included
?
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
?
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1 m, which is shorter reach than 82% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 14.4% of immersion blenders.
Weight
1.044 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.044 kg, which is lighter in hand than 50.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.5% of immersion blenders.
Height
22.1 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 22.1 cm in height, which is more compact than 97.9% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Philips HR3781/00 vs the average immersion blender

  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • 17.9 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (22.1 cm vs 40 cm).
    22.1 cm vs 40 cm
  • Includes the double beater
    This immersion blender includes the double beater while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 3 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (5 vs 2).
    5 vs 2
  • 11.4% higher user score
    User score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 67% of models

    70%

    9.1

    Rating

    30%

    7.9

    Popularity

    8.8 vs 7.9
  • 28.6% cheaper
    Philips HR3781/00 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£35 vs £45).
    £35 vs £45
  • 4.4% better value for money
    Philips HR3781/00 has better value for money than the average immersion blender (8.06 vs 7.7).
    8.06 vs 7.73
  • 11.4% higher user score
    User score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 67% of models

    70%

    9.1

    Rating

    30%

    7.9

    Popularity

    8.8 vs 7.9
  • 28.6% cheaper
    Philips HR3781/00 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£35 vs £45).
    £35 vs £45
  • 4.4% better value for money
    Philips HR3781/00 has better value for money than the average immersion blender (8.06 vs 7.7).
    8.06 vs 7.73
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • 3 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (5 vs 2).
    5 vs 2
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the double beater
    This immersion blender includes the double beater while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 17.9 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (22.1 cm vs 40 cm).
    22.1 cm vs 40 cm
  • 4.1% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.044 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 200 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (500 W vs 700 W).
    500 W vs 700 W
  • 1,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (13,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    13,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 0.2 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1 m vs 1.2 m
  • 200 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (500 W vs 700 W).
    500 W vs 700 W
  • 1,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (13,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    13,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 0.2 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1 m vs 1.2 m

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Philips HR3781/00

  • Versatile 3-in-1 design that functions as a mixer, immersion blender, and chopper
  • Powerful 500W motor with 5 different speed settings and a turbo mode
  • Soft Start function efficiently minimizes initial food splashes
  • Ergonomic, lightweight handle provides a comfortable and secure grip
  • Clever 1-litre prep cup serves as a tidy storage solution for accessories
  • Sleek, modern design that allows the unit to stand upright easily
  • Dishwasher-safe parts make cleanup quick and effortless

What customers don't like about Philips HR3781/00

  • Power drop issues reported by some users when processing thick or heavy dough
  • Inserting the agitators and attachments can feel tedious and requires practice
  • The inclusion of a plastic mixing bowl rather than a glass one
  • Relatively short power cord limits kitchen mobility
  • Can be considered pricey compared to single-function alternatives

Verdict

The Philips 5000 Series HR3781/00 is a versatile 500-watt multi-functional hand mixer and immersion appliance equipped with 5 distinct speed settings, a Turbo boost option, and an integrated LED display screen. Key characteristics include an innovative, long-reach ergonomic design and a clever Soft Start feature that gradually builds up speed to blend or knead efficiently without creating a mess. The main pros of this kitchen tool are its powerful motor capable of tackling tough doughs, precise speed control, anti-splatter performance in deep bowls, and high-quality, dishwasher-safe stainless steel attachments. However, notable cons include its lack of pre-programmed settings, the absence of an integrated timer or cord storage, and a tendency to feel a bit heavy during prolonged mixing sessions.

Compare Philips HR3781/00 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Philips HR3781/00 and other immersion blenders

No results found