Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Kubo 1000W Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Power:1000 WCordless:noWeight:1.84 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Kubo 1000W Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Kubo 1000W
7.8/10

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

65%

7.8

Technical score

25%

7.8

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 74% of immersion blenders
8.4

Value for money

Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

â–²Better than 82%
7.8

Technical score

Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

45%

8.0

Performance

20%

6.9

Accessories

15%

9.2

Design

10%

6.8

Usability

10%

7.9

Dimensions

â–²Better than 81%
7.8

User score

User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

7.8

Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

7.7

Rating

30%

8.7

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 60%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • kubo-1000w
  • kubo-1000w
  • kubo-1000w
  • kubo-1000w
  • kubo-1000w
  • kubo-1000w
  • kubo-1000w
kubo-1000w
kubo-1000w
kubo-1000w
kubo-1000w
kubo-1000w
kubo-1000w
kubo-1000w
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Kubo 1000W

Technical score
Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

45%

8.0

Performance

20%

6.9

Accessories

15%

9.2

Design

10%

6.8

Usability

10%

7.9

Dimensions

7.8
Value for money
Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

8.4
Power
1,000 W
This immersion blender delivers 1,000 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 65.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.2% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
5
This immersion blender features 5 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 56.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8.7% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
3
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
600 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 600 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 74.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 12.3% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
500 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 500 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 91.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 7.1% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
?
Weight
1.84 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.84 kg, which is heavier in hand than 82.5% of immersion blenders.
Height
37.8 cm
This immersion blender stands 37.8 cm in height, which is more compact than 73.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.8% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Kubo 1000W vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 300 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (1,000 W vs 700 W).
    1,000 W vs 700 W
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 100 ml larger chopper volume
    This immersion blender chops whole onions, large bunches of herbs, and portions of meat in a single batch without overloading compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 500 ml).
    600 ml vs 500 ml
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 3 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (5 vs 2).
    5 vs 2
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 8.2% better value for money
    Kubo 1000W has better value for money than the average immersion blender (8.36 vs 7.7).
    8.36 vs 7.73
  • 28.6% cheaper
    Kubo 1000W is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£35 vs £45).
    £35 vs £45
  • 300 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (1,000 W vs 700 W).
    1,000 W vs 700 W
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • 3 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (5 vs 2).
    5 vs 2
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 100 ml larger chopper volume
    This immersion blender chops whole onions, large bunches of herbs, and portions of meat in a single batch without overloading compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 500 ml).
    600 ml vs 500 ml
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 2.2 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (37.8 cm vs 40 cm).
    37.8 cm vs 40 cm
  • 200 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (500 ml vs 700 ml).
    500 ml vs 700 ml
  • 69% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.8 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.84 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 1.3% lower user score
    User score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    7.8

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    7.7

    Rating

    30%

    8.7

    Popularity

    7.8 vs 7.9
  • 1.3% lower user score
    User score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    7.8

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    7.7

    Rating

    30%

    8.7

    Popularity

    7.8 vs 7.9
  • 200 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (500 ml vs 700 ml).
    500 ml vs 700 ml
  • 69% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.8 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.84 kg vs 1.089 kg

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Kubo 1000W

  • Powerful 1000W motor easily handles tough or fibrous ingredients
  • Comes with useful attachments including a 600ml chopper, a measuring cup, and a mixer attachment
  • Equipped with 4 durable stainless steel blades that deliver fast results
  • Features a variable speed control gearbox to adjust power to different recipes
  • Dishwasher-safe removable accessories make cleanup very easy

What customers don't like about Kubo 1000W

  • Can bog down or experience motor strain if overloaded with overly thick mixtures
  • May emit a warm motor smell or heat up during prolonged, continuous heavy use
  • Offers less nuanced texture control compared to pricier premium brands
  • The body has a relatively large diameter making it slightly bulky to hold for small hands

Verdict

The Kubo 1000W Hand Blender (Model KBHB3525) is a high-performance 3-in-1 immersion blender featuring a powerful 1000-watt motor, a durable stainless steel foot, and 4 angled stainless steel blades designed for efficient crushing and pureeing. Operating on 220-230V, it incorporates 5 adjustable speed levels for continuous cruise control alongside a specialized kneading blade. The kit includes versatile machine-washable accessories such as a 600ml chopper, a whisk attachment, and a 500ml measuring cup, with a built-in LED light indicating its power status. Main pros include its robust blending strength for tough ingredients, excellent versatility with its multi-functional attachments, and an ergonomic grip that makes it comfortable to handle. However, notable cons include its dependency on a corded AC electric power source which limits mobility, and the heavy 1.84 kg total weight that may lead to hand fatigue during prolonged operational periods.

Compare Kubo 1000W with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Kubo 1000W and other immersion blenders

No results found