OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Kenwood HBM713P Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90Power:700 WCordless:noWeight:1.33 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Kenwood HBM713P Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Kenwood HBM713P
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

65%

6.8

Technical score

25%

6.8

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 58% of immersion blenders
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

â–¼Worse than 69%
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Score components

45%

5.7

Performance

20%

7.1

Accessories

15%

9.1

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

8.5

Dimensions

â–²Better than 51%
6.8

User score

User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models

6.8

Mark 8.1 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.5

Rating

30%

7.2

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 78%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • kenwood-hbm713p
  • kenwood-hbm713p
  • kenwood-hbm713p
kenwood-hbm713p
kenwood-hbm713p
kenwood-hbm713p
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Kenwood HBM713P

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Score components:

45%

5.7

Performance

20%

7.1

Accessories

15%

9.1

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

8.5

Dimensions

6.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

7.3
Power
700 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 700 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 48.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.3% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
14,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 14,000 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 53.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.1% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 2 attachments, which is more versatile than 44.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 7.8% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
?
Chopper capacity
500 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 500 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 14.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 59.2% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
750 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 750 ml, which is larger than the cup of 68.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.5% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
?
Weight
1.33 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.33 kg, which is heavier in hand than 64.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.9% of immersion blenders.
Height
39 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 39 cm in height, which is more compact than 62.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.9% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Kenwood HBM713P vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Includes the potato masher
    This immersion blender includes the potato masher while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 50 ml larger beaker volume
    This immersion blender accommodates larger smoothies and milkshakes without ingredients splashing over the beaker rim compared to the average immersion blender (750 ml vs 700 ml).
    750 ml vs 700 ml
  • 1 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (39 cm vs 40 cm).
    39 cm vs 40 cm
  • Includes the potato masher
    This immersion blender includes the potato masher while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 50 ml larger beaker volume
    This immersion blender accommodates larger smoothies and milkshakes without ingredients splashing over the beaker rim compared to the average immersion blender (750 ml vs 700 ml).
    750 ml vs 700 ml
  • 1 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (39 cm vs 40 cm).
    39 cm vs 40 cm
  • 13.9% lower user score
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models

    6.8

    Mark 8.1 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.5

    Rating

    30%

    7.2

    Popularity

    6.8 vs 7.9
  • 22.1% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.3 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.33 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (14,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    14,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 5.1% worse value for money
    Kenwood HBM713P has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.35 vs 7.7).
    7.35 vs 7.73
  • 2x more expensive
    Kenwood HBM713P is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£90 vs £45).
    £90 vs £45
  • 13.9% lower user score
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models

    6.8

    Mark 8.1 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.5

    Rating

    30%

    7.2

    Popularity

    6.8 vs 7.9
  • 5.1% worse value for money
    Kenwood HBM713P has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.35 vs 7.7).
    7.35 vs 7.73
  • 2x more expensive
    Kenwood HBM713P is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£90 vs £45).
    £90 vs £45
  • 500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (14,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    14,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 22.1% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.3 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.33 kg vs 1.089 kg

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Kenwood HBM713P

  • The 700-watt motor provides sufficient power to tackle basic blending tasks like smoothies, soups, and sauces effortlessly.
  • The innovative Triblade system utilizes a three-blade design that efficiently draws food upwards to ensure uniform mixing and pureeing.
  • Features a dedicated steel masher attachment that functions exceptionally well for creating smooth, creamy mashed vegetables.
  • Equipped with a turbo function that delivers a highly useful extra burst of power when processing tougher ingredients.
  • The main blending wand and non-motorized accessories are straightforward to clean and dishwasher-safe.

What customers don't like about Kenwood HBM713P

  • Limited speed versatility with only two main speed settings plus the turbo button.
  • The motorized handle can feel somewhat heavy and tiresome to hold during extended periods of continuous blending.
  • The unit is prone to getting quite hot if run continuously or used heavily for thick recipes.
  • Several users reported long-term durability issues with internal plastic gear components or the drive shaft socket cracking over time.
  • The package lacks a dedicated storage holder or caddy to organize the included attachments cleanly.

Verdict

The Kenwood HBM713P is a corded electric immersion blender featuring a 700-watt motor, a 0.7-liter measuring beaker, and a specialized steel potato masher attachment. Its key characteristics include a durable stainless steel triple-blade system for anti-splash flow management and simple push-button controls supporting two speed levels plus a turbo mode. Main pros highlight its exceptional power for efficient mixing and pureeing, dishwasher-safe components for effortless cleanup, and an ergonomic grip designed for stable handling. However, notable cons include its limited selection of speed adjustments compared to multi-speed dials and its inability to safely crush hard ice cubes without risk of damaging the blades.

Compare Kenwood HBM713P with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Kenwood HBM713P and other immersion blenders

No results found