OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Graef HB82 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£160Power:200 WCordless:yesWeight:0.89 kgStepless variable speed:yesDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Graef HB82 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Graef HB82
6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

65%

5.8

Technical score

25%

5.8

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 89% of immersion blenders
6.2

Value for money

Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

6.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 88%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

45%

4.3

Performance

20%

4.6

Accessories

15%

8.8

Design

10%

6.9

Usability

10%

9.4

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 74%
5.8

User score

User score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

5.8

Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.8

Rating

30%

6.3

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 91%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • graef-hb-82-cordless
  • graef-hb-82-cordless
  • graef-hb-82-cordless
  • graef-hb-82-cordless
  • graef-hb-82-cordless
  • graef-hb-82-cordless
graef-hb-82-cordless
graef-hb-82-cordless
graef-hb-82-cordless
graef-hb-82-cordless
graef-hb-82-cordless
graef-hb-82-cordless
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Immersion Blenders model ranking

Ranked #504 of 725 models in Immersion Blenders (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Graef HB82

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components:

45%

4.3

Performance

20%

4.6

Accessories

15%

8.8

Design

10%

6.9

Usability

10%

9.4

Dimensions

5.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

6.9

Price

6.2
Power
200 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 200 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 87.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.1% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
?
Stepless variable speed
yes
This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
13,500 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 13,500 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 57.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.9% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
yes
This immersion blender supports cordless operation.
Battery type
Lithium-ion
Show more
Number of accessories
1
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 1 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 55.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 24.1% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
No
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
500 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 500 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 14.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 59.2% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
?
Measuring cup/glass capacity
600 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 600 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 53.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 38.2% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic, Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
-
Weight
0.89 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.89 kg, which is lighter in hand than 75.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.5% of immersion blenders.
Height
39.3 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 39.3 cm in height, which is more compact than 58.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3.2% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Graef HB82 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 18.3% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.9 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.89 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 0.7 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (39.3 cm vs 40 cm).
    39.3 cm vs 40 cm
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 18.3% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.9 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.89 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 0.7 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (39.3 cm vs 40 cm).
    39.3 cm vs 40 cm
  • 500 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (200 W vs 700 W).
    200 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 26.6% lower user score
    User score
    5.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

    5.8

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.8

    Rating

    30%

    6.3

    Popularity

    5.8 vs 7.9
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 5 min shorter battery runtime
    This immersion blender provides less wireless operating time, risking battery exhaustion during elaborate multi-course meals compared to the average immersion blender (20 min vs 25 min).
    20 min vs 25 min
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • 26.6% lower user score
    User score
    5.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

    5.8

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.8

    Rating

    30%

    6.3

    Popularity

    5.8 vs 7.9
  • 23.6% worse value for money
    Graef HB82 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.25 vs 7.7).
    6.25 vs 7.73
  • 3.56x more expensive
    Graef HB82 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£160 vs £45).
    £160 vs £45
  • 500 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (200 W vs 700 W).
    200 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 1,000 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (13,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    13,500 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 5 min shorter battery runtime
    This immersion blender provides less wireless operating time, risking battery exhaustion during elaborate multi-course meals compared to the average immersion blender (20 min vs 25 min).
    20 min vs 25 min
  • 50 min slower charging time
    This immersion blender remains tied to the charging dock longer before restoring full wireless operation compared to the average immersion blender (180 min vs 130 min).
    180 min vs 130 min
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • 1 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Graef HB82

  • Cordless design provides excellent flexibility and maximum freedom of movement in the kitchen without messy cables.
  • Intuitive SteplessTouchControl allows for seamless and responsive speed adjustment based on finger pressure.
  • Lightweight construction (under 900 grams) ensures comfortable handling and minimizes hand fatigue during extended use.
  • Effective anti-splash function keeps the workspace and pots clean during blending.
  • Ergonomically designed stainless steel and plastic housing offers a solid, premium feel and secure grip.
  • Comes with a practical, BPA-free 600 ml measuring cup for direct preparation.

What customers don't like about Graef HB82

  • The 200-watt motor is less aggressive and powerful compared to premium high-torque, corded models.
  • Not suitable for heavy-duty commercial food prep or handling incredibly tough ingredients like crushing ice.
  • Requires a 3-hour charging time to achieve roughly 20 to 30 minutes of continuous runtime.
  • Unlike the higher-tier HB 802 variant, the base HB 82 package lacks extra structural attachments like a multi-chopper or whisk.

Verdict

The Graef HB82 is a lightweight 890g immersion blender featuring a 200-watt motor that reaches speeds up to 13,500 RPM, powered by an 11.1V 2,000 mAh lithium-ion battery. Its main characteristics and pros include complete wireless flexibility, an intuitive SteplessTouchControl for continuous finger-pressure speed adjustment, a dual stainless steel blade with anti-splash protection, and up to 20-30 minutes of runtime with a 3-hour recharge time. However, notable cons include its relatively modest 200-watt power output compared to corded models, a lengthy 3-hour charge time for limited runtime, and fewer included accessories compared to its HB 802 counterpart as it primarily packs just a 600 ml BPA-free measuring cup.

Compare Graef HB82 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Graef HB82 and other immersion blenders

No results found