OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Ex-Pro Cordless 100W Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£55Power:100 WCordless:yesWeight:?Stepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:no

Ex-Pro Cordless 100W Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Ex-Pro Cordless 100W
5.8/10

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

65%

5.6

Technical score

25%

5.6

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 93% of immersion blenders
6.8

Value for money

Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 80%
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

45%

3.5

Performance

20%

5.8

Accessories

15%

9.6

Design

10%

6.1

Usability

10%

8.0

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 80%
5.6

User score

User score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models

5.6

Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.3

Rating

30%

7.0

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 93%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • ex-pro-cordless-100w
  • ex-pro-cordless-100w
  • ex-pro-cordless-100w
  • ex-pro-cordless-100w
  • ex-pro-cordless-100w
  • ex-pro-cordless-100w
  • ex-pro-cordless-100w
ex-pro-cordless-100w
ex-pro-cordless-100w
ex-pro-cordless-100w
ex-pro-cordless-100w
ex-pro-cordless-100w
ex-pro-cordless-100w
ex-pro-cordless-100w
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Ex-Pro Cordless 100W

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

45%

3.5

Performance

20%

5.8

Accessories

15%

9.6

Design

10%

6.1

Usability

10%

8.0

Dimensions

5.6
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

6.8
Power
100 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 100 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 98.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.7% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
1
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 1 speed levels, which is less adjustable than 79.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
13,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 13,000 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 64.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
no
This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
yes
This immersion blender supports cordless operation.
Battery type
Lithium-ion
Show more
Number of accessories
?
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
-
Weight
?
Height
43.3 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 43.3 cm in height, which is taller than 82.7% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Ex-Pro Cordless 100W vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the storage stand
    This immersion blender includes the storage stand while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 10 min faster charging time
    This immersion blender returns to full cord-free readiness sooner between lunch preparations and dinner soups than the average immersion blender (120 min vs 130 min).
    120 min vs 130 min
  • 22.2% cheaper
    This immersion blender is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£55 vs £45).
    £55 vs £45
  • 22.2% cheaper
    This immersion blender is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£55 vs £45).
    £55 vs £45
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 10 min faster charging time
    This immersion blender returns to full cord-free readiness sooner between lunch preparations and dinner soups than the average immersion blender (120 min vs 130 min).
    120 min vs 130 min
  • Includes the storage stand
    This immersion blender includes the storage stand while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 600 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (100 W vs 700 W).
    100 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 29.1% lower user score
    User score
    5.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models

    5.6

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.3

    Rating

    30%

    7.0

    Popularity

    5.6 vs 7.9
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • 12 min shorter battery runtime
    This immersion blender provides less wireless operating time, risking battery exhaustion during elaborate multi-course meals compared to the average immersion blender (13 min vs 25 min).
    13 min vs 25 min
  • 1,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (13,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    13,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 3.3 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (43.3 cm vs 40 cm).
    43.3 cm vs 40 cm
  • 29.1% lower user score
    User score
    5.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models

    5.6

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.3

    Rating

    30%

    7.0

    Popularity

    5.6 vs 7.9
  • 13.5% worse value for money
    This immersion blender has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.8 vs 7.7).
    6.8 vs 7.73
  • 600 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (100 W vs 700 W).
    100 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1,500 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (13,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    13,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 1 speed levels fewer
    This immersion blender has fewer speed increments, giving less nuance between gentle stirring and intense pureeing compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • 12 min shorter battery runtime
    This immersion blender provides less wireless operating time, risking battery exhaustion during elaborate multi-course meals compared to the average immersion blender (13 min vs 25 min).
    13 min vs 25 min
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 3.3 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (43.3 cm vs 40 cm).
    43.3 cm vs 40 cm

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Ex-Pro Cordless 100W

  • Cordless design offers maximum freedom of movement without tangled wires.
  • Comes with a convenient dedicated storage stand.
  • Features a safety lock button to prevent accidental activation.
  • Long stainless steel blending rod easily reaches into deep pots and pans.
  • Lightweight and ergonomic handle minimizes hand fatigue during use.
  • Detachable blending leg makes it quick and easy to clean.
  • Includes a color-coded LED light indicator for real-time battery status.

What customers don't like about Ex-Pro Cordless 100W

  • Limited to a single-speed setting of 13,000 RPM with no variable speed control.
  • The 100W motor is less powerful compared to standard corded models.
  • Operating runtime is relatively short, lasting only up to 13 minutes per full charge.
  • Takes up to 2 hours to fully recharge the lithium-ion battery.
  • Cannot be used while the unit is plugged in and charging.

Verdict

The Ex-Pro Cordless 100W Hand Blender is a handheld stick immersion mixer designed with durable stainless steel blades and a long, detachable leg suited for deep pots and pans. Key specifications and characteristics include a 100-watt single-speed motor reaching a top speed of 13,000 RPM, a built-in safety lock button to prevent accidental activation, a splash-preventing blade guard, and a rechargeable lithium-ion battery that fully charges in 2 hours via a color-coded LED power indicator. Main pros include its cordless portability offering total freedom of movement, hassle-free cleaning, and a convenient included storage stand; however, its primary cons are the limitation of a single speed setting and the inability to be operated while plugged in and recharging.

Compare Ex-Pro Cordless 100W with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ex-Pro Cordless 100W and other immersion blenders

No results found