OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

EUREL TrendLine MP74 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£60Power:150 WCordless:yesWeight:2.5 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:?

EUREL TrendLine MP74 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

EUREL TrendLine MP74
6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

65%

6.3

Technical score

25%

6.3

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 75% of immersion blenders
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

â–¼Worse than 73%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components

45%

4.4

Performance

20%

8.0

Accessories

15%

9.2

Design

10%

6.9

Usability

10%

6.1

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 61%
6.3

User score

User score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models

6.3

Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.7

Rating

30%

5.9

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 84%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • eurel-trendline-mp74
  • eurel-trendline-mp74
  • eurel-trendline-mp74
  • eurel-trendline-mp74
  • eurel-trendline-mp74
  • eurel-trendline-mp74
  • eurel-trendline-mp74
  • eurel-trendline-mp74
eurel-trendline-mp74
eurel-trendline-mp74
eurel-trendline-mp74
eurel-trendline-mp74
eurel-trendline-mp74
eurel-trendline-mp74
eurel-trendline-mp74
eurel-trendline-mp74
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender EUREL TrendLine MP74

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components:

45%

4.4

Performance

20%

8.0

Accessories

15%

9.2

Design

10%

6.9

Usability

10%

6.1

Dimensions

6.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

7.2
Power
150 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 150 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 97.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.3% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
5
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 5 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 56.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8.7% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
?
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
yes
This immersion blender supports cordless operation.
Battery type
Lithium-ion
Show more
Number of accessories
4
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 4 attachments, which is more versatile than 83% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 11.4% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
500 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 500 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 14.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 59.2% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
600 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 600 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 53.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 38.2% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
-
Weight
2.5 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 2.5 kg, which is heavier in hand than 90.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.1% of immersion blenders.
Height
44 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 44 cm in height, which is taller than 83.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.4% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
6x 6 (?)

EUREL TrendLine MP74 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 2 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (4 vs 2).
    4 vs 2
  • Includes the potato masher
    This immersion blender includes the potato masher while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 3 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (5 vs 2).
    5 vs 2
  • 3 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (5 vs 2).
    5 vs 2
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 2 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (4 vs 2).
    4 vs 2
  • Includes the potato masher
    This immersion blender includes the potato masher while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 550 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (150 W vs 700 W).
    150 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2.3x heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (2.5 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    2.5 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 20.3% lower user score
    User score
    6.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models

    6.3

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.7

    Rating

    30%

    5.9

    Popularity

    6.3 vs 7.9
  • 5 min shorter battery runtime
    This immersion blender provides less wireless operating time, risking battery exhaustion during elaborate multi-course meals compared to the average immersion blender (20 min vs 25 min).
    20 min vs 25 min
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • 50 min slower charging time
    This immersion blender remains tied to the charging dock longer before restoring full wireless operation compared to the average immersion blender (180 min vs 130 min).
    180 min vs 130 min
  • 4 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (44 cm vs 40 cm).
    44 cm vs 40 cm
  • 20.3% lower user score
    User score
    6.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models

    6.3

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.7

    Rating

    30%

    5.9

    Popularity

    6.3 vs 7.9
  • 7.2% worse value for money
    EUREL TrendLine MP74 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.21 vs 7.7).
    7.21 vs 7.73
  • 33.3% more expensive
    EUREL TrendLine MP74 is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£60 vs £45).
    £60 vs £45
  • 550 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (150 W vs 700 W).
    150 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 5 min shorter battery runtime
    This immersion blender provides less wireless operating time, risking battery exhaustion during elaborate multi-course meals compared to the average immersion blender (20 min vs 25 min).
    20 min vs 25 min
  • 50 min slower charging time
    This immersion blender remains tied to the charging dock longer before restoring full wireless operation compared to the average immersion blender (180 min vs 130 min).
    180 min vs 130 min
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • 2.3x heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (2.5 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    2.5 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 4 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (44 cm vs 40 cm).
    44 cm vs 40 cm

Third-party reviews

What customers like about EUREL TrendLine MP74

  • Cordless design offers excellent flexibility and portability without needing a wall socket.
  • Comes as a versatile 4-in-1 set including a whisk, chopper, potato masher, and a 600ml measuring cup with a lid.
  • Equipped with a modern USB-C charging port for convenient recharging.
  • Features 5 adjustable speed levels and an LED speed display for precise control.
  • Includes a built-in safety function to prevent accidental start-up.
  • Easy and quick accessory transitions via the Easy-Click/Quick-Click connection system.

What customers don't like about EUREL TrendLine MP74

  • The 150-watt DC motor is significantly less powerful than traditional corded immersion blenders, which often reach 600W to 1000W.
  • Battery runtime is capped at approximately 20 minutes per full charge, making it less ideal for prolonged or commercial heavy-use sessions.
  • Requires regular recharging cycles and a waiting period when the battery drains entirely.
  • The lower wattage and battery power can struggle or experience strain when processing tough, dense, or heavily fibrous ingredients compared to high-end corded models.

Verdict

The EUREL TrendLine MP74 is a cordless immersion blender powered by a 150-watt DC motor and a 2000 mAh (14.8 Wh) lithium-ion battery. It features high-quality stainless steel blades, five adjustable speed levels monitored via an LED indicator, a built-in safety lock system, and an Easy-Click coupling mechanism for switching attachments. Main pros include its cordless freedom, universal USB-C charging capability, up to 20 minutes of continuous runtime per charge, and a versatile 4-in-1 accessory package containing a single whisk, chopper, pureeing attachment, and a 600 ml measuring jug with a lid. Potential cons include a relatively modest 150W power output compared to heavy-duty corded models, a strict 20-minute operational limit dictated by battery life, and the inherent necessity to pause and recharge the unit once the battery drains completely.

Compare EUREL TrendLine MP74 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of EUREL TrendLine MP74 and other immersion blenders

No results found