OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Electrolux E4HB1-6GG Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Power:600 WCordless:noWeight:1.196 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Electrolux E4HB1-6GG Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Electrolux E4HB1-6GG
7.1/10

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components

65%

6.5

Technical score

25%

8.7

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 51% of immersion blenders
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

â–²Better than 55%
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components

45%

5.5

Performance

20%

7.4

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.4

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 56%
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models

70%

8.8

Rating

30%

8.4

Popularity

â–²Better than 62%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • electrolux-e4hb1-6gg
  • electrolux-e4hb1-6gg
  • electrolux-e4hb1-6gg
  • electrolux-e4hb1-6gg
  • electrolux-e4hb1-6gg
  • electrolux-e4hb1-6gg
  • electrolux-e4hb1-6gg
electrolux-e4hb1-6gg
electrolux-e4hb1-6gg
electrolux-e4hb1-6gg
electrolux-e4hb1-6gg
electrolux-e4hb1-6gg
electrolux-e4hb1-6gg
electrolux-e4hb1-6gg
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Electrolux E4HB1-6GG

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components:

45%

5.5

Performance

20%

7.4

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.4

Dimensions

6.5
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components:

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

7.9
Power
600 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 600 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
20,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 20,000 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 93.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.7% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
3
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
600 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 600 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 74.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 12.3% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
600 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 600 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 53.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 38.2% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1.2 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.2 m, which is longer reach than 22.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 27.8% of immersion blenders.
Weight
1.196 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.196 kg, which is heavier in hand than 54% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 4% of immersion blenders.
Height
40.1 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 40.1 cm in height, which is taller than 55.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.5% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
5.5x 9.1

Electrolux E4HB1-6GG vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 5,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (20,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    20,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 100 ml larger chopper volume
    This immersion blender chops whole onions, large bunches of herbs, and portions of meat in a single batch without overloading compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 500 ml).
    600 ml vs 500 ml
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 10.1% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 62% of models

    70%

    8.8

    Rating

    30%

    8.4

    Popularity

    8.7 vs 7.9
  • 28.6% cheaper
    Electrolux E4HB1-6GG is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£35 vs £45).
    £35 vs £45
  • 2% better value for money
    Electrolux E4HB1-6GG has better value for money than the average immersion blender (7.88 vs 7.7).
    7.88 vs 7.73
  • 10.1% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 62% of models

    70%

    8.8

    Rating

    30%

    8.4

    Popularity

    8.7 vs 7.9
  • 28.6% cheaper
    Electrolux E4HB1-6GG is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£35 vs £45).
    £35 vs £45
  • 2% better value for money
    Electrolux E4HB1-6GG has better value for money than the average immersion blender (7.88 vs 7.7).
    7.88 vs 7.73
  • 5,500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (20,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    20,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 100 ml larger chopper volume
    This immersion blender chops whole onions, large bunches of herbs, and portions of meat in a single batch without overloading compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 500 ml).
    600 ml vs 500 ml
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • 100 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (600 W vs 700 W).
    600 W vs 700 W
  • 9.8% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.2 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.196 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 0.1 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (40.1 cm vs 40 cm).
    40.1 cm vs 40 cm
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 100 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (600 W vs 700 W).
    600 W vs 700 W
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 9.8% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.2 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.196 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 0.1 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (40.1 cm vs 40 cm).
    40.1 cm vs 40 cm

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Electrolux E4HB1-6GG

  • Efficient blending performance on everyday tasks like soups, sauces, and purees due to TruFlow technology
  • Comes with a versatile 3-in-1 accessory package including a mini-chopper, a whisk, and a 600ml measuring beaker
  • Turbo function provides an instant burst of full 600-watt power for demanding mixtures
  • Safe and healthy food prep with completely BPA-free plastic components
  • Easy cleanup as most detachable accessories are dishwasher safe

What customers don't like about Electrolux E4HB1-6GG

  • Limited speed control with only one main speed setting alongside the turbo button
  • The 600W motor can struggle or strain when processing very hard ingredients, thick doughs, or crushing ice
  • Predominantly plastic construction on the main motor housing reduces the premium feel compared to metal competitors

Verdict

The Electrolux Create 4 E4HB1-6GG is a 600-watt immersion blender featuring TruFlow technology with an optimized mixing foot design and two sharp stainless steel blades for smooth blending. Key characteristics and pros include its mechanical control interface with two speed settings (1 standard speed plus a powerful turbo boost function), a 1.2-meter cord, and a versatile package of BPA-free, dishwasher-safe accessories including a 600 ml splash-preventing beaker, a wire whisk, and a 500 ml mini chopper. However, some minor drawbacks are its predominantly plastic housing rather than a full premium metal body, and a 600-watt motor that, while highly efficient for daily tasks like soups and baby food, might feel less powerful compared to high-end heavy-duty blenders.

Compare Electrolux E4HB1-6GG with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Electrolux E4HB1-6GG and other immersion blenders

No results found