OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Electrolux E3HB1-4GG Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Power:400 WCordless:noWeight:0.713 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Electrolux E3HB1-4GG Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Electrolux E3HB1-4GG
6.6/10

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components

65%

5.9

Technical score

25%

?

User scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 8.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 68% of immersion blenders
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

â–¼Worse than 62%
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

45%

5.4

Performance

20%

4.6

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.9

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 69%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
No ratings from across the web yet, so it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
No ratings from across the web yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • electrolux-e3hb1-4gg
  • electrolux-e3hb1-4gg
  • electrolux-e3hb1-4gg
  • electrolux-e3hb1-4gg
  • electrolux-e3hb1-4gg
  • electrolux-e3hb1-4gg
  • electrolux-e3hb1-4gg
electrolux-e3hb1-4gg
electrolux-e3hb1-4gg
electrolux-e3hb1-4gg
electrolux-e3hb1-4gg
electrolux-e3hb1-4gg
electrolux-e3hb1-4gg
electrolux-e3hb1-4gg
Where to buy
    N/A~ £35
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Electrolux E3HB1-4GG

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

45%

5.4

Performance

20%

4.6

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.9

Dimensions

5.9
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components:

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

7.5
Power
400 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 400 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 69.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 4.7% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
?
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
1
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 1 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 55.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 24.1% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
600 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 600 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 53.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 38.2% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Plastic
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1.2 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.2 m, which is longer reach than 22.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 27.8% of immersion blenders.
Weight
0.713 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.713 kg, which is lighter in hand than 88.7% of immersion blenders.
Height
40.1 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 40.1 cm in height, which is taller than 55.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.5% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
55x 91

Electrolux E3HB1-4GG vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 34.5% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.7 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.713 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 28.6% cheaper
    Electrolux E3HB1-4GG is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£35 vs £45).
    £35 vs £45
  • 28.6% cheaper
    Electrolux E3HB1-4GG is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£35 vs £45).
    £35 vs £45
  • 34.5% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.7 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.713 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 300 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (400 W vs 700 W).
    400 W vs 700 W
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • 1 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 2.9% worse value for money
    Electrolux E3HB1-4GG has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.51 vs 7.7).
    7.51 vs 7.73
  • 0.1 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (40.1 cm vs 40 cm).
    40.1 cm vs 40 cm
  • 2.9% worse value for money
    Electrolux E3HB1-4GG has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.51 vs 7.7).
    7.51 vs 7.73
  • 300 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (400 W vs 700 W).
    400 W vs 700 W
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • 1 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 0.1 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (40.1 cm vs 40 cm).
    40.1 cm vs 40 cm

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Electrolux E3HB1-4GG

  • Efficient blending performance on everyday tasks like soups, purees, and smoothies using TruFlow technology.
  • The 400W motor feels honest and reliable for an entry-level kitchen appliance.
  • Convenient Turbo button provides instant access to full power for demanding tasks.
  • Comfortable, lightweight, and ergonomic handle design that minimizes hand fatigue.
  • Includes a large 600ml BPA-free measuring beaker shaped specifically to prevent kitchen splashes.
  • Compact dimensions make it highly practical for easy storage and small countertops.
  • Removable blending foot makes the unit very simple to clean.

What customers don't like about Electrolux E3HB1-4GG

  • The motor can struggle, bog down, or omit a warm smell if it is overloaded or used continuously on very thick mixtures.
  • Offers limited speed control with only two static buttons instead of a continuous speed-dial.
  • Basic model lacks advanced accessories commonly found in larger kits, such as a wire whisk or mini-chopper.
  • Lacks a dedicated pan guard or rubberized lip to guarantee zero scratching on breakable or delicate cookware.

Verdict

The Electrolux Create 3 E3HB1-4GG is a corded immersion hand blender designed for daily meal preparation, featuring a 400W motor and a 1.2-meter power cable. Its main characteristic is the proprietary TruFlow technology, which utilizes an optimized stainless steel blade design and a uniquely shaped mixing foot to ensure smooth, efficient blending while minimizing splashing. Main pros include a dedicated turbo button for instant access to maximum power, dishwasher-safe components, and the inclusion of a large, anti-splash 600 ml BPA-free beaker suitable for safe food preparation, including baby food. However, main cons include limited speeds with just one base speed setting before using the turbo mode, a plastic housing construction rather than metal, and a lack of extra multi-functional accessories like a whisk or mini-chopper attachment in this base package.

Compare Electrolux E3HB1-4GG with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Electrolux E3HB1-4GG and other immersion blenders

No results found