OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Black+Decker BCKM1011KGF-QW Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£80Power:?Cordless:yesWeight:1.3 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Black+Decker BCKM1011KGF-QW Review: Compare 40 technical specifications and 2 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Black+Decker BCKM1011KGF-QW
7.1/10

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components

65%

7.1

Technical score

25%

7.1

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 50% of immersion blenders
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

8.7

Price

â–¼Worse than 58%
7.1

Technical score

Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Score components

45%

6.8

Performance

20%

5.5

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

9.7

Usability

10%

7.8

Dimensions

â–²Better than 58%
7.1

User score

User score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models

7.1

Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

7.7

Rating

30%

7.9

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 74%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • blackdecker-bckm1011kgf-qw
  • blackdecker-bckm1011kgf-qw
  • blackdecker-bckm1011kgf-qw
  • blackdecker-bckm1011kgf-qw
  • blackdecker-bckm1011kgf-qw
  • blackdecker-bckm1011kgf-qw
  • blackdecker-bckm1011kgf-qw
blackdecker-bckm1011kgf-qw
blackdecker-bckm1011kgf-qw
blackdecker-bckm1011kgf-qw
blackdecker-bckm1011kgf-qw
blackdecker-bckm1011kgf-qw
blackdecker-bckm1011kgf-qw
blackdecker-bckm1011kgf-qw
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Immersion Blenders model ranking

Ranked #306 of 725 models in Immersion Blenders (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Black+Decker BCKM1011KGF-QW

Technical score
Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Score components:

45%

6.8

Performance

20%

5.5

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

9.7

Usability

10%

7.8

Dimensions

7.1
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components:

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

8.7

Price

7.6
Power
?
Number of speeds
5
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 5 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 56.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8.7% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
yes
This immersion blender supports cordless operation.
Battery type
lithium-ion
Show more
Number of accessories
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 2 attachments, which is more versatile than 44.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 7.8% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
700 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 700 ml, which is larger than the cup of 47% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 21% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic, Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
-
Weight
1.3 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.3 kg, which is heavier in hand than 60.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3.2% of immersion blenders.
Height
49 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 49 cm in height, which is taller than 89.7% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
11.7

Black+Decker BCKM1011KGF-QW vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 7 min longer battery runtime
    This immersion blender powers through multiple consecutive pots of soup and bowl purees without dying mid-recipe compared to the average immersion blender (32 min vs 25 min).
    32 min vs 25 min
  • Supports remaining-time indication
    This immersion blender supports remaining-time indication while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • 3 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (5 vs 2).
    5 vs 2
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • 3 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (5 vs 2).
    5 vs 2
  • Supports cordless operation
    This immersion blender supports cordless operation while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 7 min longer battery runtime
    This immersion blender powers through multiple consecutive pots of soup and bowl purees without dying mid-recipe compared to the average immersion blender (32 min vs 25 min).
    32 min vs 25 min
  • Supports remaining-time indication
    This immersion blender supports remaining-time indication while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 9 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (49 cm vs 40 cm).
    49 cm vs 40 cm
  • 10.1% lower user score
    User score
    7.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models

    7.1

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    7.7

    Rating

    30%

    7.9

    Popularity

    7.1 vs 7.9
  • 19.4% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.3 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.3 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 77.8% more expensive
    Black+Decker BCKM1011KGF-QW is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£80 vs £45).
    £80 vs £45
  • 1.7% worse value for money
    Black+Decker BCKM1011KGF-QW has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.6 vs 7.7).
    7.6 vs 7.73
  • 10.1% lower user score
    User score
    7.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models

    7.1

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    7.7

    Rating

    30%

    7.9

    Popularity

    7.1 vs 7.9
  • 77.8% more expensive
    Black+Decker BCKM1011KGF-QW is more expensive than the average immersion blender (£80 vs £45).
    £80 vs £45
  • 1.7% worse value for money
    Black+Decker BCKM1011KGF-QW has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.6 vs 7.7).
    7.6 vs 7.73
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 9 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (49 cm vs 40 cm).
    49 cm vs 40 cm
  • 19.4% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.3 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.3 kg vs 1.089 kg

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
thespruceeats.com
≈ estimated
06/09/2023
Hands-on test · Cordless kit
Verdict
The Black+Decker Kitchen Wand 6 Kit is a cordless stick blender that replaces many small gadgets, though it is less powerful than the Breville and some attachments come loose.
8.0
reviewed.com
≈ estimated
28/08/2023
Hands-on test · Multi-tool kit
Verdict
The Black+Decker Kitchen Wand is a cordless multi-tool that suits small kitchens, but it struggles with tough ingredients and needs regular charging.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Black+Decker BCKM1011KGF-QW

  • Cordless design provides excellent mobility and freedom of movement
  • Ergonomic handle is comfortable to hold and supports easy one-handed operation
  • Features 5 adjustable speed levels for precise control over blending consistency
  • Versatile multi-tool compatible with numerous handy attachments
  • Saves kitchen storage space by substituting multiple dedicated appliances
  • Includes a low-profile charging base that serves as a convenient storage dock

What customers don't like about Black+Decker BCKM1011KGF-QW

  • Lacks the raw power of a standard corded model and struggles with tough or frozen ingredients
  • Battery can deplete unexpectedly in the middle of heavy kitchen tasks
  • The primary power unit is heavily weighted and can feel somewhat unwieldy
  • Initial or full battery charging takes several hours and can be frustrating

Verdict

The BLACK+DECKER KitchenWand BCKM1011KGF-QW is a cordless, rechargeable immersion blender featuring a 7.2V lithium-ion battery that delivers up to 24–32 minutes of runtime and comes with a dedicated charging dock with LED indicators. It utilizes an ergonomic, lightweight grey and copper handle designed for one-handed operation, a 5-speed variable dial, a bell-shaped head housing a 4-point stainless steel blade, and a BPA-free 700ml mixing cup with a lid. Key advantages include ultimate cordless freedom for plug-free cooking, easy-to-clean removable components, a pan guard to protect cookware, and compatibility with a multi-tool attachment system (such as whisks, can openers, and grinders sold separately). However, notable drawbacks include a relatively long 5-hour full recharge time, a heavy base unit, and a tendency to struggle when processing frozen or particularly tough ingredients.

Compare Black+Decker BCKM1011KGF-QW with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Black+Decker BCKM1011KGF-QW and other immersion blenders

No results found