OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

AFRA 350W Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Power:350 WCordless:noWeight:0.81 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:?

AFRA 350W Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

AFRA 350W
5.0/10

Overall score

Score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

65%

4.8

Technical score

25%

4.8

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 98% of immersion blenders
6.5

Value for money

Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

70%

5.0

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 84%
4.8

Technical score

Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

45%

3.6

Performance

20%

3.3

Accessories

15%

6.6

Design

10%

5.2

Usability

10%

9.5

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 95%
4.8

User score

User score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models

4.8

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.8

Rating

30%

5.0

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 98%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • afra-350w
  • afra-350w
  • afra-350w
  • afra-350w
  • afra-350w
  • afra-350w
  • afra-350w
afra-350w
afra-350w
afra-350w
afra-350w
afra-350w
afra-350w
afra-350w
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender AFRA 350W

Technical score
Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components:

45%

3.6

Performance

20%

3.3

Accessories

15%

6.6

Design

10%

5.2

Usability

10%

9.5

Dimensions

4.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components:

70%

5.0

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.5
Power
350 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 350 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 74.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 4.3% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
?
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
0
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 0 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 79.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.2% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic, Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
?
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
?
Weight
0.81 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.81 kg, which is lighter in hand than 80.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.3% of immersion blenders.
Height
33.5 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 33.5 cm in height, which is more compact than 89.7% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
6.9x 6.9

AFRA 350W vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 6.5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (33.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    33.5 cm vs 40 cm
  • 25.6% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.8 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.81 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 2.25x cheaper
    AFRA 350W is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£20 vs £45).
    £20 vs £45
  • 2.25x cheaper
    AFRA 350W is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£20 vs £45).
    £20 vs £45
  • 6.5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (33.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    33.5 cm vs 40 cm
  • 25.6% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.8 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.81 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 39.2% lower user score
    User score
    4.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models

    4.8

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.8

    Rating

    30%

    5.0

    Popularity

    4.8 vs 7.9
  • 350 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (350 W vs 700 W).
    350 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 39.2% lower user score
    User score
    4.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models

    4.8

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.8

    Rating

    30%

    5.0

    Popularity

    4.8 vs 7.9
  • 18.5% worse value for money
    AFRA 350W has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (6.52 vs 7.7).
    6.52 vs 7.73
  • 350 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (350 W vs 700 W).
    350 W vs 700 W
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AFRA 350W

  • Reliable performance for everyday basic food prep like soups, sauces, and smoothies
  • Comes with 2 distinct speed settings for better control over different ingredient textures
  • Durable and rust-resistant stainless steel blade that delivers consistent blending
  • Slim, compact, and lightweight handheld stick design making it easy to store and use directly inside pots or bowls
  • Backed by an excellent 2-year manufacturer warranty for long-term confidence

What customers don't like about AFRA 350W

  • At 350W, the motor power is on the lower side and can struggle with frozen fruits, hard nuts, or thick fibrous vegetables
  • Lacks advanced speed variations or a dedicated turbo burst button found on higher-wattage models
  • The basic package is a no-frills stick blender that does not include extra kitchen accessories like a whisk, chopper bowl, or measuring beaker

Verdict

The AFRA 350W Hand Blender is a compact kitchen appliance featuring a 350-watt motor, two speed settings, and durable stainless steel blades housed in a slim handheld design measuring 6.9 x 33.5 x 6.9 cm. Its main advantages include a lightweight stick build that allows for direct blending in pots or bowls, consistent results for daily preparations like smoothies or soups, and an included 2-year manufacturer warranty for peace of mind. However, its lower wattage means it is not suitable for heavy-duty kitchen tasks like crushing ice or grinding tough nuts, and the plastic-and-stainless-steel construction lacks the premium feel of entirely metal alternatives.

Compare AFRA 350W with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AFRA 350W and other immersion blenders

No results found