OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Graphics cards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v3.0

AMD Radeon RX 9070 review: 117 specs compared

Avg. price:~£480VRAM:16 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):220 W

AMD Radeon RX 9070 Review: Compare 117 technical specifications, 23 expert and video reviews and 19 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Radeon RX 9070
8.6/10

Overall score

Score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

40%

8.3

Technical score

25%

8.2

Reviews score

25%

8.9

List score

10%

10

Sentiment score

★Better than 99% of graphics cards
8.4

Value for money

Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

★Better than 99%
8.3

Technical score

Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 73% of models
Score components

44%

7.6

Performance

24%

8.6

Memory

12%

8.7

Power

11%

9.4

Features

5%

7.8

Design

4%

9.9

Connectivity

▲Better than 73%
8.2

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 69% of models

80%

7.9

Average grade

20%

9.1

Popularity

Grades by review (23)
17 reviews: 11 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 69%
8.9

List score

List score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (19)
List score: in 19 of 87 lists (22%)
★Better than 99%
  • amd-radeon-rx-9070
amd-radeon-rx-9070
Where to buy
    N/A~ £480
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the AMD Radeon RX 9070

Based on 17 · 6

Solid gaming performance, ample memory and efficient, quiet running earn praise, while creative and AI work disappoints and ray tracing splits opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card AMD Radeon RX 9070

Technical score
Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 73% of models
Score components:

44%

7.6

Performance

24%

8.6

Memory

12%

8.7

Power

11%

9.4

Features

5%

7.8

Design

4%

9.9

Connectivity

8.3
Reviews score
8.2
List score
8.9
Value for money
Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 100% of models
Score components:

70%

8.6

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

8.4
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
24,000 points
Market range: <4.1k points – >30.1k points
This graphics card scores 24,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 74.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
16,261 points
Market range: <0 points – >22.4k points
This graphics card scores 16,261 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is higher than 76.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
25,388 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 25,388 points in PassMark G3D, which is higher than 58.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
14,163 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 14,163 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 54.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
FP32 performance
36.1 TFLOPS
Market range: <3.94 TFLOPS – >56.3 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 36.1 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is higher than that of 68.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRAM
16 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This graphics card has 16 GB of VRAM, which is more than 62% of graphics cards and equal to 28.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 16.4% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <128 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 50.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.5% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
640 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 640 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 66.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.9% of graphics cards.
Effective memory speed
20,000 MHz
Market range: <7k MHz – >28k MHz
This graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 20,000 MHz, which is faster than that of 53.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5
This graphics card supports PCIe 5, which is newer than on 73% of graphics cards and equal to 27% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 24.1% of graphics cards and equal to 75.9% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.8% of graphics cards and equal to 77.2% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.8% of graphics cards and equal to 79.2% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 2% of graphics cards and equal to 98% of graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 9% of graphics cards and equal to 88.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21.7% of graphics cards and equal to 76% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2.1a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2.1a, which is more advanced than on 74.2% of graphics cards and equal to 3.6% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
77.76 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 77.76 Gbps, which is faster than on 83.9% of graphics cards and equal to 1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
220 W
Market range: <86 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 220 W, which is higher than that of 50.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
220 W
Market range: <106 W – >365 W
This graphics card draws 220 W under peak load, which is lower than 47.8% of graphics cards and equal to 3.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
650 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 650 W PSU, which is lower than that of 39.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
340 W
Market range: <107 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 340 W, which is higher than that of 81.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
220 W
Show more
What reviewers say
Size
?
Length
312 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >337 mm
This graphics card is 312 mm long, which is longer than 69.2% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Height
111 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 111 mm tall, which is shorter than 83.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.5 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s, which is slimmer than 35.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 14.7% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,000 g
Market range: <541 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,000 g, which is lighter than 50.9% of Graphics cards and equal to 3.3% of Graphics cards.
Show more
What reviewers say

AMD Radeon RX 9070 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryFeaturesConnectivityPowerDesign
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • 43.9% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,518 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,518 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 42.9% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (640 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    640 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 20% smaller process node
    This graphics card uses a smaller manufacturing process than the average graphics card (4 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    4 nm vs 5 nm
  • 16 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    56 vs 40
  • 17.1% higher list score
    List score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (19)
    List score: in 19 of 87 lists (22%)
    8.9 vs 7.6
  • 13.9% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.6 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 69% of models

    80%

    7.9

    Average grade

    20%

    9.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (23)
    17 reviews: 11 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.2 vs 7.2
  • 28.2% higher sentiment score
    10.0 vs 7.8
  • 13.3% better value for money
    AMD Radeon RX 9070 has better value for money than the average graphics card (8.4 vs 7.4).
    8.4 vs 7.41
  • 64 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (128 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    128 vs 64
  • 16 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    56 vs 40
  • 49.3% higher texture rate
    This graphics card has a higher texture rate than the average graphics card (564.5 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 378 GTexel/s.
    564.5 GTexel/s vs 378 GTexel/s
  • 16 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (56 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    56 vs 40
  • 59.7% higher FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP32 performance than the average graphics card (36.1 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.6 TFLOPS.
    36.1 TFLOPS vs 22.6 TFLOPS
  • 40 more TMUs
    This graphics card has more TMUs than the average graphics card (224 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    224 vs 184
  • 2 years newer
    This graphics card was released more recently than the average graphics card (2025 vs 2023).
    March 2025
    2025 vs 2023
  • 77.8% higher ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a higher ray tracing score than the average graphics card (16,261 points vs 9,148 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9,148 points.
    16,261 points vs 9,148 points
  • 62.4% higher gaming score
    This graphics card has a higher gaming score than the average graphics card (24,000 points vs 14,779 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14,779 points.
    24,000 points vs 14,779 points
  • 7.8% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2070 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,070 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 3.17x higher FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (1.5 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    1.52 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 4.09x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (145 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.48 TFLOPS.
    145 TFLOPS vs 35.48 TFLOPS
  • 2.45x higher FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher FP16 performance than the average graphics card (72.3 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.5 TFLOPS.
    72.3 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB more VRAM
    This graphics card has more VRAM than the average graphics card (16 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    16 GB vs 12 GB
  • 64 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (256 bit vs 192 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 192 bit.
    256 bit vs 192 bit
  • 43.9% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2,518 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
    2,518 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 42.9% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (640 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    640 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 16x more Infinity Cache
    This graphics card has more Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (64 MB vs 4 MB). The average graphics card has 4 MB Infinity Cache.
    64 MB vs 4 MB
  • 20% smaller process node
    This graphics card uses a smaller manufacturing process than the average graphics card (4 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a manufacturing process of 5 nm.
    4 nm vs 5 nm
  • Newer PCIe version
    This graphics card supports a newer PCIe version than the average graphics card (5 vs 4).
    5 vs 4
  • 2.35x more transistors
    This graphics card has more transistors than the average graphics card (53,900 million vs 22,900 million). The average graphics card has 22,900 million transistors.
    53,900 million vs 22,900 million
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 1.4a).
    2.1a vs 1.4a
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1b vs 2.1a).
    2.1b vs 2.1a
  • 3.6x higher DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (77.8 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 21.6 Gbps.
    77.76 Gbps vs 21.6 Gbps
  • 9.6 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (25.8 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    25.8 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 54.5% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (340 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    340 W vs 220 W
  • 32 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (112 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    112 vs 144
  • 29.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (312 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    312 mm vs 282.2 mm
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 75% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (32 KB vs 128 KB). The average graphics card has 128 KB L1 cache.
    32 KB vs 128 KB
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 32 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (112 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    112 vs 144
  • 75% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (32 KB vs 128 KB). The average graphics card has 128 KB L1 cache.
    32 KB vs 128 KB
  • 66.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (8 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    8 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Less advanced frame generation
    This graphics card has less advanced frame generation than the average graphics card (frame generation vs multi frame generation).
    frame generation vs multi frame generation
  • 54.5% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (340 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    340 W vs 220 W
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 29.8 mm longer card length
    This graphics card is longer than the average graphics card (312 mm vs 282.2 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 282.2 mm.
    312 mm vs 282.2 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

6.0
zWORMz Gaming
≈ estimated
27/04/2025
Gameplay review · 20 games tested at 1440p
Verdict
AMD Radeon RX 9070 offers good 1440p performance and efficiency, but the 9070 XT is the better buy and value depends on price.
9.0
Hardware Unboxed
≈ estimated
08/12/2025
Value comparison · six years of Radeon cards
Verdict
AMD Radeon RX 9070 is the best-value Radeon in years, provided it sells near its launch MSRP.
Overview video
Hands-on video, no verdict

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
01/05/2025
Hands-on test · 1440p gaming
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is the best AMD card for 1440p gaming, though it's close to its faster sibling, the RX 9070 XT.
7.0
techspot.com
✓ explicit
07/03/2025
Benchmark review · Game-by-game tests
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a solid 1440p gaming card that edges the RTX 5070 in most games, but its 4K lead over Nvidia is small.
9.0
tomshardware.com
✓ explicit
05/03/2025
Lab test · Mid-range graphics card
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a capable mainstream card with 16GB of memory, but the XT model is the stronger card.
9.0
digitalfoundry.net
≈ estimated
05/03/2025
Lab test · Efficiency and ray tracing
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a sensible 1440p card whose FSR 4 upscaling is a viable DLSS alternative, but it draws more power than Nvidia's rivals.
9.0
gamersnexus.net
≈ estimated
07/03/2025
Lab test · Efficiency and gaming
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is among the most power-efficient GPUs, staying close to the XT's gaming speed in most titles.
7.0
kitguru.net
✓ explicit
05/03/2025
Hands-on review · Hardware and power
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a cut-down Navi 48 card that competes head-on with the RTX 5070, though the XT's extra cores make it the stronger pick.
8.0
gamesradar.com
✓ explicit
13/08/2025
Hands-on test · 4K and upscaling
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 handles 4K well and beats the RTX 5070 with ray tracing off, but Nvidia's DLSS 4 is ahead on AI frame generation.
8.0
pcworld.com
✓ explicit
05/03/2025
Hands-on test · 1440p and ray tracing
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a strong 1440p card with 16GB of memory that beats the RTX 5070, though it trails Nvidia in heavy ray tracing and DLSS 4.
9.0
arstechnica.com
≈ estimated
05/03/2025
Hands-on test · Power limits
Verdict
The Radeon RX 9070 is a strong 1440p and 4K card that matches the RTX 5070 with ray tracing on and draws about as much power as a 4070 Super.
7.0
pcgamesn.com
✓ explicit
10/03/2025
Benchmark review · Gaming performance
Verdict
The Radeon RX 9070 is a fast 1440p and 4K gaming card that edges out the RTX 5070 in many games but chokes on heavy path tracing.
8.2
geekawhat.com
✓ explicit
05/03/2025
Benchmark review · Gigabyte design
Verdict
The Gigabyte RX 9070 Gaming OC is a cool, sturdy card that draws 220W and suits 1440p and 4K gamers who don't mind a plain black look.
mmorpg.com
05/03/2025
Not graded yet
7.0
igorslab.de
≈ estimated
05/03/2025
Hands-on test · Quiet dual-BIOS card
Verdict
The XFX RX 9070 Quicksilver is a quiet, plainly styled card with two 8-pin power plugs, though its test sample had signal and connection glitches.
8.8
ginjfo.com
✓ explicit
05/03/2025
Lab test · Gaming and ray tracing
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a balanced card that beats the RTX 5070 at 1440p, though demanding games at 4K need lower settings.
9.0
profesionalreview.com
✓ explicit
05/03/2025
Hands-on test · Custom RX 9070
Verdict
The ASRock RX 9070 Steel Legend suits 1440p gamers, with 16GB of memory and two standard 8-pin power plugs, but needs three slots and 300mm of case room.
9.0
tomshw.it
✓ explicit
06/03/2025
Benchmark review · Mid-range card
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a strong pick for high-fps gaming with 16GB of memory, but it struggles with heavy ray tracing and creative work.
8.0
tech.everyeye.it
≈ estimated
05/03/2025
Lab test · Custom design
Verdict
The Sapphire RX 9070 Pure is a strong, quiet card that stays cool, but its 32cm, three-slot body rules out many small builds.
6.0
techtesters.eu
≈ estimated
05/03/2025
Early test · Upscaling and performance
Verdict
The Radeon RX 9070 is about 5% faster than the RTX 5070 across 45 tested games, but FSR 4 still looks less sharp than Nvidia's DLSS 4.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AMD Radeon RX 9070

  • Strong 1440p rasterization performance, often beating the NVIDIA RTX 5070
  • Generous 16GB of VRAM provides better long-term viability than 12GB competitors
  • Excellent power efficiency, often cited as one of the most efficient GPUs on the market
  • Noticeable generational improvement in ray tracing performance over RDNA 3
  • Introduction of AI-powered upscaling via FSR 4 improves image quality
  • Operates at very low temperatures even under high load

What customers don't like about AMD Radeon RX 9070

  • Heavily overshadowed by the RX 9070 XT, which offers significantly better performance for only $50 more
  • Ray tracing performance still generally lags behind NVIDIA's latest Blackwell architecture
  • Slower GDDR6 memory compared to the GDDR7 used in NVIDIA's RTX 50-series
  • MSRP of $549 is viewed as slightly too high; many critics suggest a $499 price point would be more competitive
  • AI-upscaling performance with FSR 4 results in a slight frame rate hit compared to non-AI FSR 3

Verdict

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is a high-performance graphics card built on the RDNA 4 architecture, featuring 56 compute units, 3,584 stream processors, and 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 256-bit memory bus. Operating with a boost clock of up to 2520 MHz and a 220W total board power, it excels in 1440p gaming and leverages new AI accelerators to support FSR 4 upscaling and significantly improved ray tracing. Main pros include its competitive price-to-performance ratio against the RTX 5070, generous VRAM for future-proofing, and high energy efficiency. However, it faces cons such as falling behind NVIDIA in complex path-tracing workloads and being closely priced to the more powerful RX 9070 XT, which can make it feel like a less compelling value.

Compare AMD Radeon RX 9070 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD Radeon RX 9070 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found