Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

iFit Active Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Battery life:7 daysScreen size:?Heart rate monitor:noGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:0 m

iFit Active Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.6

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.3

Technical score

20%

7.7

User score

▼Worse than 68% of fitness-trackers
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

6.9

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.5

Battery

18%

5.5

Health

18%

6.9

Display

8%

5.4

Smart Features

8%

9.5

App & Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

7.7

Design & Durability

▼Worse than 77% of fitness-trackers
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

2.3

Number of reviews

Based on 3 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 77% of fitness-trackers
  • ifit-active
  • ifit-active
  • ifit-active
  • ifit-active
ifit-active
ifit-active
ifit-active
ifit-active

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker iFit Active

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

6.9

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.5

Battery

18%

5.5

Health

18%

6.9

Display

8%

5.4

Smart Features

8%

9.5

App & Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

7.7

Design & Durability

6.3
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

2.3

Number of reviews

Based on 3 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
2.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
iFit Active has a popularity score of 2.3 points, which is lower than 56.8% of fitness trackers.
2.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.6

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

7.6
Heart rate monitor
no
Heart rate monitor
no
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 60.3% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
?
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
no
Notifications
no
This fitness tracker does not support notifications. 73% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
yes
Coaching
yes
This fitness tracker supports coaching. 66.5% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Via the iFIT app.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 7 days which is shorter than that of 53.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 22.8% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
?
Display type
OLED
Display type
OLED
This fitness tracker uses OLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 52.8% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 21.5% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
120x 240
Screen resolution
120x 240
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 120x240 which is higher than that of 72.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 4% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
modular
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
?
Show more

iFit Active vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Coaching features
    Coaching
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
    Via the iFIT app.
  • Recovery time advisor
    Recovery time advisor
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports recovery time guidance, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.2% of fitness trackers support recovery time guidance.
  • 28% lighter
    Thickness
    18 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (18 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    18 g vs 25 g
  • 2 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    2
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (2 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    2 vs 0
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
    The official companion app supports manual food entry and barcode-based logging.
  • Available on PC
    Available on PC
    yes
    This fitness tracker is available on PC, while the average fitness tracker is not. 18.1% of fitness trackers are available on PC.
    Web dashboard available.
  • Ad-free
    Free app
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an ad-free app, while the average fitness tracker does not. 48.1% of fitness trackers have an ad-free app.
    Basic app access is free.
  • 2 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    2
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (2 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    2 vs 0
  • 28% lighter
    Thickness
    18 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (18 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    18 g vs 25 g
  • 20.8 mm lower height
    Height
    20 mm
    This fitness tracker is shorter than the average fitness tracker (20 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    20 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • Coaching features
    Coaching
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
    Via the iFIT app.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
    The official companion app supports manual food entry and barcode-based logging.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • Available on PC
    Available on PC
    yes
    This fitness tracker is available on PC, while the average fitness tracker is not. 18.1% of fitness trackers are available on PC.
    Web dashboard available.
  • Ad-free
    Free app
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an ad-free app, while the average fitness tracker does not. 48.1% of fitness trackers have an ad-free app.
    Basic app access is free.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • 4.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    6 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (6 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    source range 4-8 h.
    6 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • No pace measurement
    Measures pace
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 61.7% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • 50 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    0 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (0 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    Not waterproof.
    0 m vs 50 m
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    120 x 240
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (120x240 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    120x240 vs 194x368
  • 57.1% more expensive
    iFit Active is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£110 vs £70).
    £110 vs £70
  • 4% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    iFit Active
    the average fitness tracker
    iFit Active has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (7.69 vs 8.000).
    7.69 vs 8
  • 4.1% worse value for money
    iFit Active has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (7.61 vs 7.9).
    7.61 vs 7.92
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • 4.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    6 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (6 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    source range 4-8 h.
    6 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    120 x 240
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (120x240 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    120x240 vs 194x368
  • Basic display glass
    Display glass type
    plastic
    This fitness tracker uses less durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (plastic vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    plastic vs glass
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 50 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    0 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (0 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    Not waterproof.
    0 m vs 50 m

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
thefoodierunner.com
08/10/2014
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
27/10/2014
Summary of the review
M
moviesgamesandtech.com
11/05/2015
Summary of the review
L
livescience.com
16/10/2014
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
04/02/2015
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
29/10/2014
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
06/02/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 3 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about iFit Active

  • Strong battery life, often lasting at least seven days on a single charge
  • Seamless wireless synchronization with compatible treadmill brands like NordicTrack and ProForm
  • Versatile wearing options, including wristband, clothing clip, or pocket carry
  • Helpful inactivity alerts that vibrate to motivate movement
  • Accurate tracking for basic metrics like daily steps and distance

What we don't like about iFit Active

  • Lacks a heart-rate monitor and is not waterproof for swimming
  • Display is difficult to read in direct sunlight
  • The screen and casing are easily scratched during normal daily use
  • Frequent synchronization issues between the device and the mobile app
  • High price point compared to competitors with more advanced features
  • The food database for calorie tracking is less accurate and smaller than rival platforms

Verdict

The iFit Active is a versatile, 3-in-1 fitness tracker designed to monitor steps, distance, calories burned, and sleep patterns, displaying data on a small integrated LED screen. Its key technical specifications include a battery life lasting between 5 to 14 days on a single charge and compatibility with iOS and Android devices via Bluetooth synchronization. A standout characteristic is its ability to wirelessly sync with iFit-enabled fitness equipment like NordicTrack and ProForm treadmills, allowing for seamless workout data integration. Its main pros are the flexible wearing options—allowing it to be used as a wristband, clipped to a belt, or placed in a pocket—along with inactivity vibration alerts and a manual calorie logging feature. However, notable cons include the lack of a built-in heart rate monitor, no waterproofing, and an LED display that is often difficult to read in direct sunlight.

Compare iFit Active with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of iFit Active and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found