Scored using Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Camera lenses Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Camera lenses Methodology v1.0

Venus Optics Laowa 7 5mm F 2 MFT Review | 54 Data compared

Avg. price:~£550Lens mount:Micro Four ThirdsMaximum focal length:7.5 mmMaximum aperture (telephoto end):2Optical image stabilization:noMaximum angle of view:110 °

Venus Optics Laowa 7 5mm F 2 MFT Review: Compare 54 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Camera lenses category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera lens's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best camera lenses on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.2

Technical score

20%

7.6

User score

▼Worse than 63% of camera-lenses
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

6.7

Optics & Aperture

24%

7.3

Build & Handling

20%

6.2

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

1.0

Mount & Format

▼Worse than 60% of camera-lenses
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

5.0

Number of reviews

Based on 44 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 84% of camera-lenses
  • venus-optics-laowa-7-5mm-f-2-mft
  • venus-optics-laowa-7-5mm-f-2-mft
  • venus-optics-laowa-7-5mm-f-2-mft
  • venus-optics-laowa-7-5mm-f-2-mft
  • venus-optics-laowa-7-5mm-f-2-mft
  • venus-optics-laowa-7-5mm-f-2-mft
  • venus-optics-laowa-7-5mm-f-2-mft
  • venus-optics-laowa-7-5mm-f-2-mft
venus-optics-laowa-7-5mm-f-2-mft
venus-optics-laowa-7-5mm-f-2-mft
venus-optics-laowa-7-5mm-f-2-mft
venus-optics-laowa-7-5mm-f-2-mft
venus-optics-laowa-7-5mm-f-2-mft
venus-optics-laowa-7-5mm-f-2-mft
venus-optics-laowa-7-5mm-f-2-mft
venus-optics-laowa-7-5mm-f-2-mft

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera lens Venus Optics Laowa 7 5mm F 2 MFT

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

35%

6.7

Optics & Aperture

24%

7.3

Build & Handling

20%

6.2

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

1.0

Mount & Format

6.2
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

5.0

Number of reviews

Based on 44 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When you want to see which camera lenses attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Venus Optics Laowa 7 5mm F 2 MFT has a popularity score of 5 points, which is lower than 76.4% of camera lenses.
5.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera lens's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.5

Overall score

40%

7.6

Price

6.9
Lens type
wide-angle prime
Lens mount
Micro Four Thirds
Sensor format coverage
Micro Four Thirds
Filter thread size
46 mm
Teleconverter compatibility
no
Teleconverter compatibility
no
This camera lens does not support teleconverters. 15.3% of camera lenses support teleconverters.
Show more
Minimum focal length
7.5 mm
Maximum focal length
7.5 mm
Optical zoom
N/A
Maximum angle of view
110 °
Minimum angle of view
110 °
Show more
Focus motor
N/A
Minimum focus distance
0.12 m
Minimum focus distance
0.12 m
This camera lens focuses as close as 0.12 m, which is closer than 97% of camera lenses and equal to 1.3% of camera lenses.
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.11xx
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.11x
This camera lens reaches a reproduction ratio of 0.11x, which is lower than 86.7% of camera lenses and equal to 3.7% of camera lenses.
Full-time manual focus
no
Full-time manual focus
no
This camera lens does not support full-time manual focus. 68.4% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
Internal focusing
yes
Internal focusing
yes
This camera lens supports internal focusing. 83.6% of camera lenses support internal focusing.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
This camera lens does not support optical image stabilization. 29.1% of camera lenses include optical image stabilization.
Stabilization effectiveness (CIPA stops)
N/A
Weight
170 g
Weight
170 g
This camera lens weighs 170 g, which is lighter than 90.1% of camera lenses and equal to the weight of 0.2% of camera lenses.
Lens length
55 mm
Lens length
55 mm
This camera lens is 55 mm long, which is shorter than 84.9% of camera lenses and equal to the length of 0.2% of camera lenses.
Lens diameter
50 mm
Lens diameter
50 mm
This camera lens has a diameter of 50 mm, which is slimmer than 99.5% of camera lenses and equal to that of 0.2% of camera lenses.
Weather sealing (splashproof)
no
Weather sealing (splashproof)
no
This camera lens does not support weather sealing. 50.3% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
Metal mount
yes
Metal mount
yes
This camera lens uses a metal lens mount. 93.6% of camera lenses use a metal lens mount.
Show more
DxOMark overall score
?
DxOMark sharpness score
?
DxOMark transmission
?
DxOMark distortion
?
DxOMark vignetting
?
Show more

Venus Optics Laowa 7 5mm F 2 MFT vs the average camera lens

246810TotalMount & FormatOptics & ApertureFocus & ControlsStabilizationBuild & HandlingLab Scores
  • Has fluorine coating
    Fluorine coating
    yes
    This camera lens has a fluorine coating, the average camera lens does not. 32.6% of camera lenses use a fluorine coating.
  • 0.8 lower f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    2
    This camera lens has a brighter maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/2 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    2 vs 2.8
  • Has aperture ring
    Aperture ring
    yes
    This camera lens has an aperture ring, the average camera lens does not. 31.3% of camera lenses include an aperture ring.
  • Has de-clickable aperture ring
    De-clickable aperture ring
    yes
    This camera lens has a de-clickable aperture ring, the average camera lens does not. 18.3% of camera lenses support a de-clickable aperture ring.
    De-clickable aperture ring.
  • 340 g lighter
    Weight
    170 g
    This camera lens is lighter than the average camera lens (170 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    170 g vs 510 g
  • Has focus distance scale
    Focus distance scale
    yes
    This camera lens has a focus distance scale, the average camera lens does not. 48.6% of camera lenses include a focus distance scale.
  • 27 mm narrower lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    50 mm
    This camera lens is slimmer than the average camera lens (50 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    50 mm vs 77 mm
  • 37.25 mm shorter lens
    Lens length
    55 mm
    This camera lens is shorter than the average camera lens (55 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    55 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • 0.8 lower f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    2
    This camera lens has a brighter maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/2 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    2 vs 2.8
  • 1 more low-dispersion elements
    Low-dispersion elements
    3
    This camera lens has more low-dispersion elements than the average camera lens (3 vs 2). The average lens has 2 low-dispersion elements.
    3 vs 2
  • Has aperture ring
    Aperture ring
    yes
    This camera lens has an aperture ring, the average camera lens does not. 31.3% of camera lenses include an aperture ring.
  • Has de-clickable aperture ring
    De-clickable aperture ring
    yes
    This camera lens has a de-clickable aperture ring, the average camera lens does not. 18.3% of camera lenses support a de-clickable aperture ring.
    De-clickable aperture ring.
  • Has focus distance scale
    Focus distance scale
    yes
    This camera lens has a focus distance scale, the average camera lens does not. 48.6% of camera lenses include a focus distance scale.
  • 0.18 m shorter minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    0.12 m
    This camera lens has a lower minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (0.1 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    0.12 m vs 0.3 m
  • Has fluorine coating
    Fluorine coating
    yes
    This camera lens has a fluorine coating, the average camera lens does not. 32.6% of camera lenses use a fluorine coating.
  • 340 g lighter
    Weight
    170 g
    This camera lens is lighter than the average camera lens (170 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    170 g vs 510 g
  • 27 mm narrower lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    50 mm
    This camera lens is slimmer than the average camera lens (50 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    50 mm vs 77 mm
  • 37.25 mm shorter lens
    Lens length
    55 mm
    This camera lens is shorter than the average camera lens (55 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    55 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • Not weather-sealed
    Weather sealing (splashproof)
    no
    This camera lens does not support weather sealing, the average camera lens does. 50.3% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
  • 2 fewer aperture blades
    Aperture blades
    7
    This camera lens has fewer aperture blades than the average camera lens (7 vs 9). The average lens has 9 aperture blades.
    7 vs 9
  • No full-time manual focus
    Full-time manual focus
    no
    This camera lens does not support full-time manual focus, the average camera lens does. 68.4% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
  • No rounded blades
    Rounded aperture blades
    no
    This camera lens does not use rounded aperture blades, the average camera lens does. 87.8% of camera lenses use rounded aperture blades.
  • Fixed lens hood
    Reversible lens hood
    no
    This camera lens does not include a reversible lens hood, the average camera lens does. 81.4% of camera lenses include a reversible lens hood.
  • 0.08 x lower maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.11 x
    This camera lens has a lower maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.1 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.11 x vs 0.192 x
  • 9.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Venus Optics Laowa 7 5mm F 2 MFT
    the average camera lens
    Venus Optics Laowa 7 5mm F 2 MFT has a lower user score than the average camera lens (7.64 vs 8.360).
    7.64 vs 8.36
  • 44.6% less popular
    Venus Optics Laowa 7 5mm F 2 MFT is less popular than the average camera lens (5.04 vs 7.3).
    5.04 vs 7.29
  • 9.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Venus Optics Laowa 7 5mm F 2 MFT
    the average camera lens
    Venus Optics Laowa 7 5mm F 2 MFT has a lower user score than the average camera lens (7.64 vs 8.360).
    7.64 vs 8.36
  • 44.6% less popular
    Venus Optics Laowa 7 5mm F 2 MFT is less popular than the average camera lens (5.04 vs 7.3).
    5.04 vs 7.29
  • 2 fewer aperture blades
    Aperture blades
    7
    This camera lens has fewer aperture blades than the average camera lens (7 vs 9). The average lens has 9 aperture blades.
    7 vs 9
  • No rounded blades
    Rounded aperture blades
    no
    This camera lens does not use rounded aperture blades, the average camera lens does. 87.8% of camera lenses use rounded aperture blades.
  • No full-time manual focus
    Full-time manual focus
    no
    This camera lens does not support full-time manual focus, the average camera lens does. 68.4% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
  • 0.08 x lower maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.11 x
    This camera lens has a lower maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.1 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.11 x vs 0.192 x
  • Not weather-sealed
    Weather sealing (splashproof)
    no
    This camera lens does not support weather sealing, the average camera lens does. 50.3% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
  • Fixed lens hood
    Reversible lens hood
    no
    This camera lens does not include a reversible lens hood, the average camera lens does. 81.4% of camera lenses include a reversible lens hood.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
ephotozine.com
04/08/2017
Summary of the review
S
shutterbug.com
01/06/2017
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
20/08/2017
Summary of the review
M
mirrorlessons.com
24/07/2017
Summary of the review
M
mirrorlesscomparison.com
15/06/2018
Summary of the review
F
fstoppers.com
28/04/2017
Summary of the review
F
fstoppers.com
05/08/2021
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
09/05/2018
Summary of the review
C
cined.com
30/05/2017
Summary of the review
S
sulasula.com
16/10/2020
Summary of the review
M
mu-43.com
29/05/2017
Summary of the review
P
photoreview.com.au
19/08/2021
Summary of the review
M
martinbelan.com
13/01/2026
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
No date provided
Summary of the review
D
digitalcamaralens.com
01/05/2018
Summary of the review
M
micro43italia.it
24/03/2022
Summary of the review
M
micro43italia.it
14/03/2021
Summary of the review
M
micro43italia.it
24/03/2022
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
06/05/2018
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 44 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Venus Optics Laowa 7 5mm F 2 MFT

  • Ultra-compact and lightweight design, making it pocketable and ideal for drones or gimbals
  • Excellent center sharpness even when wide open at f/2
  • Fast f/2 maximum aperture, highly beneficial for low-light and astrophotography
  • Solid metal build quality often described as 'built like a tank'
  • Well-controlled rectilinear distortion for such an ultra-wide focal length
  • Impressive minimum focus distance of 4.7 inches (12cm) for creative close-up shots
  • Reasonable pricing compared to larger, heavier MFT ultra-wide zoom alternatives

What we don't like about Venus Optics Laowa 7 5mm F 2 MFT

  • Heavy vignetting (light falloff) especially when wide open at f/2
  • Noticeable softness and chromatic aberration at the extreme edges and corners at wider apertures
  • Strictly manual focus and manual aperture control with no electronic communication for EXIF data
  • Lack of weather sealing
  • The included lens hood can be very tight to fit and may slightly increase vignetting when in use
  • Susceptible to ghosting flare when shooting toward bright light sources

Verdict

The Venus Optics Laowa 7.5mm f/2 MFT is an ultra-wide rectilinear prime lens for Micro Four Thirds cameras, offering a 15mm equivalent focal length and an expansive 110° field of view. Weighing only 170g (with a 150g 'Lite' version for drones) and measuring 55mm in length, its optical construction includes 13 elements in 9 groups, featuring two aspherical and three extra-low dispersion elements to minimize distortion and aberrations. Key advantages include its exceptionally compact metal build, a fast f/2 aperture ideal for astrophotography and low-light environments, a close minimum focusing distance of 12cm, and a standard 46mm filter thread. However, main drawbacks include noticeable vignetting (light falloff) at wider apertures, the lack of autofocus or electronic communication in standard versions, and a susceptibility to ghosting flare in bright lighting conditions.

Compare Venus Optics Laowa 7 5mm F 2 MFT with other products in the Camera lenses category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Venus Optics Laowa 7 5mm F 2 MFT and other products in the Camera lenses category

No results found