Scored using Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Camera lenses Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Camera lenses Methodology v1.0

Sigma 35mm F 2 DG DN Review | 54 Data compared

Avg. price:~£530Lens mount:Sony E, L-MountMaximum focal length:35 mmMaximum aperture (telephoto end):2Optical image stabilization:noMaximum angle of view:63.4 °

Sigma 35mm F 2 DG DN Review: Compare 54 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Camera lenses category and whether it is worth buying.

7.3

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera lens's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best camera lenses on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.0

Technical score

20%

8.5

User score

â–˛Better than 71% of camera-lenses
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

8.7

Optics & Aperture

24%

8.8

Build & Handling

20%

4.8

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

1.0

Mount & Format

â–˛Better than 68% of camera-lenses
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.3

Number of reviews

Based on 306 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–˛Better than 56% of camera-lenses
  • sigma-35mm-f-2-dg-dn
  • sigma-35mm-f-2-dg-dn
  • sigma-35mm-f-2-dg-dn
  • sigma-35mm-f-2-dg-dn
  • sigma-35mm-f-2-dg-dn
  • sigma-35mm-f-2-dg-dn
sigma-35mm-f-2-dg-dn
sigma-35mm-f-2-dg-dn
sigma-35mm-f-2-dg-dn
sigma-35mm-f-2-dg-dn
sigma-35mm-f-2-dg-dn
sigma-35mm-f-2-dg-dn

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera lens Sigma 35mm F 2 DG DN

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

35%

8.7

Optics & Aperture

24%

8.8

Build & Handling

20%

4.8

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

1.0

Mount & Format

7.0
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.3

Number of reviews

Based on 306 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
7.3/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When you want to see which camera lenses attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Sigma 35mm F 2 DG DN has a popularity score of 7.3 points, which is higher than 49.6% of camera lenses.
7.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera lens's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.3

Overall score

40%

7.7

Price

7.4
Lens type
prime
Lens mount
Sony E, L-Mount
Sensor format coverage
Full-frame
Filter thread size
58 mm
Teleconverter compatibility
no
Teleconverter compatibility
no
This camera lens does not support teleconverters. 15.3% of camera lenses support teleconverters.
Show more
Minimum focal length
35 mm
Maximum focal length
35 mm
Optical zoom
N/A
Maximum angle of view
63.4 °
Minimum angle of view
63.4 °
Show more
Focus motor
STM
Minimum focus distance
0.27 m
Minimum focus distance
0.27 m
This camera lens focuses as close as 0.27 m, which is closer than 63.8% of camera lenses and equal to 0.7% of camera lenses.
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.175xx
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.175x
This camera lens reaches a reproduction ratio of 0.175x, which is lower than 54.3% of camera lenses and equal to 2.4% of camera lenses.
Full-time manual focus
no
Full-time manual focus
no
This camera lens does not support full-time manual focus. 68.4% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
Internal focusing
yes
Internal focusing
yes
This camera lens supports internal focusing. 83.6% of camera lenses support internal focusing.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
This camera lens does not support optical image stabilization. 29.1% of camera lenses include optical image stabilization.
Stabilization effectiveness (CIPA stops)
N/A
Weight
373 g
Weight
373 g
This camera lens weighs 373 g, which is lighter than 66.6% of camera lenses.
Lens length
65.4 mm
Lens length
65.4 mm
This camera lens is 65.4 mm long, which is shorter than 77.6% of camera lenses.
Lens diameter
70 mm
Lens diameter
70 mm
This camera lens has a diameter of 70 mm, which is slimmer than 69.9% of camera lenses and equal to that of 3.5% of camera lenses.
Weather sealing (splashproof)
yes
Weather sealing (splashproof)
yes
This camera lens supports weather sealing. 50.2% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
Partial sealing.
Metal mount
yes
Metal mount
yes
This camera lens uses a metal lens mount. 93.6% of camera lenses use a metal lens mount.
Show more
DxOMark overall score
?
DxOMark sharpness score
?
DxOMark transmission
?
DxOMark distortion
?
DxOMark vignetting
?
Show more

Sigma 35mm F 2 DG DN vs the average camera lens

246810TotalMount & FormatOptics & ApertureFocus & ControlsStabilizationBuild & HandlingLab Scores
  • 0.8 lower f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    2
    This camera lens has a brighter maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/2 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    2 vs 2.8
  • Has aperture ring
    Aperture ring
    yes
    This camera lens has an aperture ring, the average camera lens does not. 31.3% of camera lenses include an aperture ring.
  • 26.85 mm shorter lens
    Lens length
    65.4 mm
    This camera lens is shorter than the average camera lens (65.4 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    65.4 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • 1 more aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    3
    This camera lens has more aspherical elements than the average camera lens (3 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    3 vs 2
  • 137 g lighter
    Weight
    373 g
    This camera lens is lighter than the average camera lens (373 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    373 g vs 510 g
  • Newer release date
    Release date
    2020
    This camera lens was released more recently than the average camera lens.
    2020 vs 2016
  • 7 mm narrower lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    70 mm
    This camera lens is slimmer than the average camera lens (70 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    70 mm vs 77 mm
  • 0.03 m shorter minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    0.27 m
    This camera lens has a lower minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (0.3 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    0.27 m vs 0.3 m
  • 0.8 lower f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    2
    This camera lens has a brighter maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/2 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    2 vs 2.8
  • 1 more aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    3
    This camera lens has more aspherical elements than the average camera lens (3 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    3 vs 2
  • Has aperture ring
    Aperture ring
    yes
    This camera lens has an aperture ring, the average camera lens does not. 31.3% of camera lenses include an aperture ring.
  • 0.03 m shorter minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    0.27 m
    This camera lens has a lower minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (0.3 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    0.27 m vs 0.3 m
  • 26.85 mm shorter lens
    Lens length
    65.4 mm
    This camera lens is shorter than the average camera lens (65.4 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    65.4 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • 137 g lighter
    Weight
    373 g
    This camera lens is lighter than the average camera lens (373 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    373 g vs 510 g
  • Newer release date
    Release date
    2020
    This camera lens was released more recently than the average camera lens.
    2020 vs 2016
  • 7 mm narrower lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    70 mm
    This camera lens is slimmer than the average camera lens (70 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    70 mm vs 77 mm
  • No full-time manual focus
    Full-time manual focus
    no
    This camera lens does not support full-time manual focus, the average camera lens does. 68.4% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
  • 1 fewer low-dispersion elements
    Low-dispersion elements
    1
    This camera lens has fewer low-dispersion elements than the average camera lens (1 vs 2). The average lens has 2 low-dispersion elements.
    1 vs 2
  • 0.02 x lower maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.175 x
    This camera lens has a lower maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.2 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.175 x vs 0.192 x
  • 1 fewer low-dispersion elements
    Low-dispersion elements
    1
    This camera lens has fewer low-dispersion elements than the average camera lens (1 vs 2). The average lens has 2 low-dispersion elements.
    1 vs 2
  • No full-time manual focus
    Full-time manual focus
    no
    This camera lens does not support full-time manual focus, the average camera lens does. 68.4% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
  • 0.02 x lower maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.175 x
    This camera lens has a lower maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.2 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.175 x vs 0.192 x

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
dpreview.com
06/01/2021
Summary of the review
E
ephotozine.com
13/01/2021
Summary of the review
C
cameralabs.com
01/12/2020
Summary of the review
P
photofocus.com
12/08/2021
Summary of the review
F
findingrange.com
07/05/2021
Summary of the review
F
fcracer.com
17/09/2023
Summary of the review
L
lenstip.com
08/01/2021
Summary of the review
D
digitalcameraworld.com
20/01/2021
Summary of the review
F
fstoppers.com
12/04/2021
Summary of the review
5
5050travelog.com
04/06/2024
Summary of the review
P
phototrend.fr
27/01/2022
Summary of the review
L
les-guides-sony.com
14/12/2020
Summary of the review
A
alphadxd.fr
25/11/2020
Summary of the review
P
photolari.com
01/12/2020
Summary of the review
F
fotochismes.com
08/01/2021
Summary of the review
D
digitalcamaralens.com
12/03/2021
Summary of the review
N
nadir.it
01/12/2020
Summary of the review
N
nadir.it
01/12/2020
Summary of the review
S
shoot.be
20/10/2022
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 306 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Sigma 35mm F 2 DG DN

  • Excellent all-metal build quality with a premium feel
  • Highly sharp and detailed image quality across the frame
  • Compact and lightweight design, ideal for street photography
  • Smooth and pleasing bokeh rendering
  • Fast and quiet autofocus performance for both photo and video
  • Includes helpful accessories like a metal lens hood and magnetic lens cap
  • Tactile aperture ring with positive clicks
  • Good value for the performance and construction

What we don't like about Sigma 35mm F 2 DG DN

  • Noticeable vignetting and distortion when shooting wide open
  • Visible color fringing (chromatic aberration) in high-contrast areas
  • Aperture ring cannot be de-clicked for silent video operation
  • Limited weather sealing, with protection primarily at the lens mount
  • Magnetic lens cap cannot be removed while the lens hood is attached
  • Some users find the image rendering to be somewhat 'sterile' or clinical
  • Occasional lens flare can be distracting in certain lighting conditions

Verdict

The Sigma 35mm f/2 DG DN Contemporary is a compact I-Series prime lens featuring a premium all-metal construction, a dedicated manual aperture ring, and a weight of approximately 325g. Its optical design consists of 10 elements in 9 groups, including one SLD element and three aspherical elements to ensure edge-to-edge sharpness and minimal distortion, while a stepping motor provides fast, quiet autofocus suitable for both stills and video. Main pros include its exceptional build quality, tactile handling, and the inclusion of a unique magnetic lens cap; however, it lacks a fully weather-sealed gasket at the mount and exhibits noticeable peripheral illumination falloff (vignetting) when shooting wide open.

Compare Sigma 35mm F 2 DG DN with other products in the Camera lenses category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sigma 35mm F 2 DG DN and other products in the Camera lenses category

No results found