Scored using Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Camera lenses Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Camera lenses Methodology v1.0

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12 200mm F 3 5 6 3 Review | 54 Data compared

Avg. price:~£790Lens mount:Micro Four ThirdsMaximum focal length:200 mmMaximum aperture (telephoto end):6.3Optical image stabilization:noMaximum angle of view:84 °

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12 200mm F 3 5 6 3 Review: Compare 54 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Camera lenses category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera lens's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best camera lenses on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

5.5

Technical score

20%

8.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 78% of camera-lenses
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

3.8

Optics & Aperture

24%

8.4

Build & Handling

20%

5.9

Focus & Controls

10%

8.2

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

1.0

Mount & Format

â–¼Worse than 80% of camera-lenses
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

8.4

Number of reviews

Based on 778 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 64% of camera-lenses
  • olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-12-200mm-f-3-5-6-3
  • olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-12-200mm-f-3-5-6-3
  • olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-12-200mm-f-3-5-6-3
  • olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-12-200mm-f-3-5-6-3
  • olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-12-200mm-f-3-5-6-3
  • olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-12-200mm-f-3-5-6-3
  • olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-12-200mm-f-3-5-6-3
olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-12-200mm-f-3-5-6-3
olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-12-200mm-f-3-5-6-3
olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-12-200mm-f-3-5-6-3
olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-12-200mm-f-3-5-6-3
olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-12-200mm-f-3-5-6-3
olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-12-200mm-f-3-5-6-3
olympus-m-zuiko-digital-ed-12-200mm-f-3-5-6-3

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera lens Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12 200mm F 3 5 6 3

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

35%

3.8

Optics & Aperture

24%

8.4

Build & Handling

20%

5.9

Focus & Controls

10%

8.2

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

1.0

Mount & Format

5.5
User score
User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

8.4

Number of reviews

Based on 778 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.7
Popularity
Popularity
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When you want to see which camera lenses attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12 200mm F 3 5 6 3 has a popularity score of 8.4 points, which is higher than 67.5% of camera lenses.
8.4
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera lens's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.1

Overall score

40%

6.3

Price

6.2
Lens type
zoom
Lens mount
Micro Four Thirds
Sensor format coverage
Micro Four Thirds
Filter thread size
72 mm
Teleconverter compatibility
no
Teleconverter compatibility
no
This camera lens does not support teleconverters. 15.3% of camera lenses support teleconverters.
Show more
Minimum focal length
12 mm
Maximum focal length
200 mm
Optical zoom
16.6xx
Maximum angle of view
84 °
Minimum angle of view
6.2 °
Show more
Focus motor
STM, MSC
Minimum focus distance
0.22 m
Minimum focus distance
0.22 m
This camera lens focuses as close as 0.22 m, which is closer than 77.7% of camera lenses and equal to 1.2% of camera lenses.
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.23xx
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.23x
This camera lens reaches a reproduction ratio of 0.23x, which is higher than 64.3% of camera lenses and equal to 2.4% of camera lenses.
Full-time manual focus
yes
Full-time manual focus
yes
This camera lens supports full-time manual focus. 68.3% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
Internal focusing
yes
Internal focusing
yes
This camera lens supports internal focusing. 83.6% of camera lenses support internal focusing.
Barrel extends only during zooming.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
This camera lens does not support optical image stabilization. 29.1% of camera lenses include optical image stabilization.
Stabilization effectiveness (CIPA stops)
N/A
Weight
510 g
Weight
510 g
This camera lens weighs 510 g, which is lighter than 50% of camera lenses and equal to the weight of 0.6% of camera lenses.
Lens length
99.7 mm
Lens length
99.7 mm
This camera lens is 99.7 mm long, which is longer than 59.1% of camera lenses.
Lens diameter
77.5 mm
Lens diameter
77.5 mm
This camera lens has a diameter of 77.5 mm, which is wider than 51.3% of camera lenses and equal to that of 0.5% of camera lenses.
Weather sealing (splashproof)
yes
Weather sealing (splashproof)
yes
This camera lens supports weather sealing. 50.2% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
IPX1 rated.
Metal mount
yes
Metal mount
yes
This camera lens uses a metal lens mount. 93.6% of camera lenses use a metal lens mount.
Show more
DxOMark overall score
?
DxOMark sharpness score
?
DxOMark transmission
?
DxOMark distortion
?
DxOMark vignetting
0.9 EV
DxOMark vignetting
0.9 EV
This camera lens has DxOMark vignetting of 0.9 EV, which is lower than that of 68.9% of camera lenses and equal to that of 13.5% of camera lenses.
Show more

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12 200mm F 3 5 6 3 vs the average camera lens

246810TotalMount & FormatOptics & ApertureFocus & ControlsStabilizationBuild & HandlingLab Scores
  • 2 more low-dispersion elements
    Low-dispersion elements
    4
    This camera lens has more low-dispersion elements than the average camera lens (4 vs 2). The average lens has 2 low-dispersion elements.
    4 vs 2
  • 1 more aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    3
    This camera lens has more aspherical elements than the average camera lens (3 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    3 vs 2
  • 0.3 EV less vignetting
    DxOMark vignetting
    0.900 EV
    This camera lens has less vignetting than the average camera lens (0.9 EV vs 1.2 EV). The average lens has vignetting of 1.2 EV.
    0.900 EV vs 1.2 EV
  • 0.08 m shorter minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    0.22 m
    This camera lens has a lower minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (0.2 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    0.22 m vs 0.3 m
  • Newer release date
    Release date
    2019
    This camera lens was released more recently than the average camera lens.
    March 2019
    2019 vs 2016
  • 0.04 x higher maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.23 x
    This camera lens has a higher maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.2 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.23 x vs 0.192 x
  • 2 more low-dispersion elements
    Low-dispersion elements
    4
    This camera lens has more low-dispersion elements than the average camera lens (4 vs 2). The average lens has 2 low-dispersion elements.
    4 vs 2
  • 1 more aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    3
    This camera lens has more aspherical elements than the average camera lens (3 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    3 vs 2
  • 0.08 m shorter minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    0.22 m
    This camera lens has a lower minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (0.2 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    0.22 m vs 0.3 m
  • 0.04 x higher maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.23 x
    This camera lens has a higher maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.2 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.23 x vs 0.192 x
  • Newer release date
    Release date
    2019
    This camera lens was released more recently than the average camera lens.
    March 2019
    2019 vs 2016
  • 0.3 EV less vignetting
    DxOMark vignetting
    0.900 EV
    This camera lens has less vignetting than the average camera lens (0.9 EV vs 1.2 EV). The average lens has vignetting of 1.2 EV.
    0.900 EV vs 1.2 EV
  • 3.5 higher f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    6.3
    This camera lens has a dimmer maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/6.3 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    6.3 vs 2.8
  • 2 fewer aperture blades
    Aperture blades
    7
    This camera lens has fewer aperture blades than the average camera lens (7 vs 9). The average lens has 9 aperture blades.
    7 vs 9
  • 7.45 mm longer lens
    Lens length
    99.7 mm
    This camera lens is longer than the average camera lens (99.7 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    99.7 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • 11.5% worse value for money
    Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12 200mm F 3 5 6 3 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera lens (6.18 vs 6.9).
    6.18 vs 6.89
  • 49.1% more expensive
    Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12 200mm F 3 5 6 3 is more expensive than the average camera lens (£790 vs £530).
    £790 vs £530
  • 11.5% worse value for money
    Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12 200mm F 3 5 6 3 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera lens (6.18 vs 6.9).
    6.18 vs 6.89
  • 49.1% more expensive
    Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12 200mm F 3 5 6 3 is more expensive than the average camera lens (£790 vs £530).
    £790 vs £530
  • 3.5 higher f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    6.3
    This camera lens has a dimmer maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/6.3 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    6.3 vs 2.8
  • 2 fewer aperture blades
    Aperture blades
    7
    This camera lens has fewer aperture blades than the average camera lens (7 vs 9). The average lens has 9 aperture blades.
    7 vs 9
  • 7.45 mm longer lens
    Lens length
    99.7 mm
    This camera lens is longer than the average camera lens (99.7 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    99.7 mm vs 92.25 mm

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
ephotozine.com
04/03/2019
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
16/03/2020
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
13/10/2023
Summary of the review
M
marcrphoto.wordpress.com
08/03/2024
Summary of the review
I
imaging-resource.com
13/02/2019
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
15/03/2019
Summary of the review
D
d-pixx.de
10/03/2019
Summary of the review
O
oly-forum.com
15/02/2019
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
15/03/2019
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
02/06/2019
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
02/03/2020
Summary of the review
L
lenaick.wordpress.com
15/05/2020
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
02/06/2019
Summary of the review
M
micro43italia.it
16/04/2019
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
06/08/2019
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 778 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12 200mm F 3 5 6 3

  • Massive 16.6x zoom range covering 12mm wide-angle to 200mm telephoto
  • Extremely versatile all-in-one choice for travel and general vacation photography
  • Robust weather-sealed construction providing dustproof, splashproof, and freezeproof protection
  • Relatively lightweight and compact design given the expansive focal range
  • Excellent close-up and macro-like focusing capabilities
  • Fast, silent, and accurate autofocus performance in good lighting conditions
  • Very sharp image results on the wider end of the zoom range (12mm to 100mm)
  • Impressive flare and ghosting control

What we don't like about Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12 200mm F 3 5 6 3

  • Slight loss of sharpness and noticeable softness at the longer telephoto end (beyond 100mm)
  • Slow variable aperture (f/3.5-6.3) that limits low-light performance
  • Lacks built-in optical image stabilization, making it entirely reliant on camera in-body image stabilization (IBIS)
  • Fussy background bokeh and struggle with subject separation due to the narrow maximum aperture
  • Mainly plastic exterior construction which can feel less robust or premium compared to Pro series lenses
  • Considered relatively expensive for a non-Pro grade lens
  • Noticeable physical extension when fully zoomed out to 200mm

Verdict

The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-200mm f/3.5-6.3 is a highly versatile, weather-sealed superzoom lens for Micro Four Thirds systems, featuring a 16.6x zoom range (24-400mm equivalent) in a compact 455-gram body. Its primary advantages include exceptional focal length coverage for travel photography, fast and quiet MSC autofocus, and impressive close-focusing capabilities (maximum magnification of 0.46x equivalent). However, compromises for its range include softer image quality at the telephoto end (200mm), a variable aperture of f/3.5-6.3 that limits low-light performance, no built-in optical image stabilization, and susceptibility to lens flare.

Compare Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12 200mm F 3 5 6 3 with other products in the Camera lenses category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12 200mm F 3 5 6 3 and other products in the Camera lenses category

No results found